Keeping up with bats: dynamic auditory tuning in a moth

J.F.C. Windmill, J.C. Jackson, Elizabeth Jane Tuck, Daniel Robert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many night-flying insects evolved ultrasound sensitive ears in response to acoustic predation by echolocating bats [1] , 2 K.D. Roeder, Nerve Cells and Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1967). [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] and [10] . Noctuid moths are most sensitive to frequencies at 20–40 kHz [6], the lower range of bat ultrasound [5] , [11] , [12] and [13] . This may disadvantage the moth because noctuid-hunting bats in particular echolocate at higher frequencies shortly before prey capture [7] , [11] , [12] and [13] and thus improve their echolocation and reduce their acoustic conspicuousness [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] and [16] . Yet, moth hearing is not simple; the ear's nonlinear dynamic response shifts its mechanical sensitivity up to high frequencies. Dependent on incident sound intensity, the moth's ear mechanically tunes up and anticipates the high frequencies used by hunting bats. Surprisingly, this tuning is hysteretic, keeping the ear tuned up for the bat's possible return. A mathematical model is constructed for predicting a linear relationship between the ear's mechanical stiffness and sound intensity. This nonlinear mechanical response is a parametric amplitude dependence [17] and [18] that may constitute a feature common to other sensory systems. Adding another twist to the coevolutionary arms race between moths and bats, these results reveal unexpected sophistication in one of the simplest ears known and a novel perspective for interpreting bat echolocation calls.
LanguageEnglish
Pages2418-2423
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Biology
Volume16
Issue number24
Early online date18 Dec 2006
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Acoustic intensity
Moths
Chiroptera
moths
Tuning
Ear
Ultrasonics
Acoustics
ears
Audition
Neurons
Dynamic response
Echolocation
Stiffness
Mathematical models
Noctuidae
acoustics
sensory system
Nonlinear Dynamics
hearing

Keywords

  • echolocation
  • acoustic structure
  • frequency bandwith
  • noctuid moths
  • mechanosensory neurones

Cite this

Windmill, J.F.C. ; Jackson, J.C. ; Tuck, Elizabeth Jane ; Robert, Daniel. / Keeping up with bats : dynamic auditory tuning in a moth. In: Current Biology. 2006 ; Vol. 16, No. 24. pp. 2418-2423.
@article{797a2ffec4984ff09b060bd71ba20844,
title = "Keeping up with bats: dynamic auditory tuning in a moth",
abstract = "Many night-flying insects evolved ultrasound sensitive ears in response to acoustic predation by echolocating bats [1] , 2 K.D. Roeder, Nerve Cells and Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1967). [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] and [10] . Noctuid moths are most sensitive to frequencies at 20–40 kHz [6], the lower range of bat ultrasound [5] , [11] , [12] and [13] . This may disadvantage the moth because noctuid-hunting bats in particular echolocate at higher frequencies shortly before prey capture [7] , [11] , [12] and [13] and thus improve their echolocation and reduce their acoustic conspicuousness [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] and [16] . Yet, moth hearing is not simple; the ear's nonlinear dynamic response shifts its mechanical sensitivity up to high frequencies. Dependent on incident sound intensity, the moth's ear mechanically tunes up and anticipates the high frequencies used by hunting bats. Surprisingly, this tuning is hysteretic, keeping the ear tuned up for the bat's possible return. A mathematical model is constructed for predicting a linear relationship between the ear's mechanical stiffness and sound intensity. This nonlinear mechanical response is a parametric amplitude dependence [17] and [18] that may constitute a feature common to other sensory systems. Adding another twist to the coevolutionary arms race between moths and bats, these results reveal unexpected sophistication in one of the simplest ears known and a novel perspective for interpreting bat echolocation calls.",
keywords = "echolocation, acoustic structure, frequency bandwith, noctuid moths, mechanosensory neurones",
author = "J.F.C. Windmill and J.C. Jackson and Tuck, {Elizabeth Jane} and Daniel Robert",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.066",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "2418--2423",
journal = "Current Biology",
issn = "0960-9822",
number = "24",

}

Keeping up with bats : dynamic auditory tuning in a moth. / Windmill, J.F.C.; Jackson, J.C.; Tuck, Elizabeth Jane; Robert, Daniel.

In: Current Biology, Vol. 16, No. 24, 19.12.2006, p. 2418-2423.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Keeping up with bats

T2 - Current Biology

AU - Windmill, J.F.C.

AU - Jackson, J.C.

AU - Tuck, Elizabeth Jane

AU - Robert, Daniel

PY - 2006/12/19

Y1 - 2006/12/19

N2 - Many night-flying insects evolved ultrasound sensitive ears in response to acoustic predation by echolocating bats [1] , 2 K.D. Roeder, Nerve Cells and Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1967). [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] and [10] . Noctuid moths are most sensitive to frequencies at 20–40 kHz [6], the lower range of bat ultrasound [5] , [11] , [12] and [13] . This may disadvantage the moth because noctuid-hunting bats in particular echolocate at higher frequencies shortly before prey capture [7] , [11] , [12] and [13] and thus improve their echolocation and reduce their acoustic conspicuousness [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] and [16] . Yet, moth hearing is not simple; the ear's nonlinear dynamic response shifts its mechanical sensitivity up to high frequencies. Dependent on incident sound intensity, the moth's ear mechanically tunes up and anticipates the high frequencies used by hunting bats. Surprisingly, this tuning is hysteretic, keeping the ear tuned up for the bat's possible return. A mathematical model is constructed for predicting a linear relationship between the ear's mechanical stiffness and sound intensity. This nonlinear mechanical response is a parametric amplitude dependence [17] and [18] that may constitute a feature common to other sensory systems. Adding another twist to the coevolutionary arms race between moths and bats, these results reveal unexpected sophistication in one of the simplest ears known and a novel perspective for interpreting bat echolocation calls.

AB - Many night-flying insects evolved ultrasound sensitive ears in response to acoustic predation by echolocating bats [1] , 2 K.D. Roeder, Nerve Cells and Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1967). [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] and [10] . Noctuid moths are most sensitive to frequencies at 20–40 kHz [6], the lower range of bat ultrasound [5] , [11] , [12] and [13] . This may disadvantage the moth because noctuid-hunting bats in particular echolocate at higher frequencies shortly before prey capture [7] , [11] , [12] and [13] and thus improve their echolocation and reduce their acoustic conspicuousness [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] and [16] . Yet, moth hearing is not simple; the ear's nonlinear dynamic response shifts its mechanical sensitivity up to high frequencies. Dependent on incident sound intensity, the moth's ear mechanically tunes up and anticipates the high frequencies used by hunting bats. Surprisingly, this tuning is hysteretic, keeping the ear tuned up for the bat's possible return. A mathematical model is constructed for predicting a linear relationship between the ear's mechanical stiffness and sound intensity. This nonlinear mechanical response is a parametric amplitude dependence [17] and [18] that may constitute a feature common to other sensory systems. Adding another twist to the coevolutionary arms race between moths and bats, these results reveal unexpected sophistication in one of the simplest ears known and a novel perspective for interpreting bat echolocation calls.

KW - echolocation

KW - acoustic structure

KW - frequency bandwith

KW - noctuid moths

KW - mechanosensory neurones

U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.066

DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.066

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 2418

EP - 2423

JO - Current Biology

JF - Current Biology

SN - 0960-9822

IS - 24

ER -