Just telling and selling: current limitations in the use of digital media in public health: A scoping review

Christine Clar, M Dyakova, K Curtis, C Dawson, P Donnelly, Lee Knifton, A Clarke

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective - To undertake a scoping review and to map research in the area of digital media use in public health.

    Study design - Scoping review.

    Methods - PubMed, PsycINFO, Google and major textbooks of public health communication and health psychology were searched for primary studies or systematic reviews examining the use of digital media in a health context. Searches focussed on studies published between the start of 2000 and the end of June 2013. Abstracts of reviews of public health interventions were examined with respect to target groups, health topic, intervention characteristics, media used, study design, issues of quality and ethics, and outcomes. To map this area of work fully, this information was supplemented by adding information from primary studies. Areas were identified where systematic review evidence was scarce or non-existent by comparing the final map with information from the reviews analysed.

    Results - 221 systematic reviews related to digital media use in a public health context were included. Most reviews included studies with an experimental design and general ‘at risk’ target populations. Specific settings were not specified in the majority of reviews. A large variety of health topics were covered. About a quarter of reviews did not specify a health topic but were concerned with broader issues of health promotion, disease prevention, or health education. Over half of the reviews focussed on eHealth and telemedicine, and another third were concerned with mass media – social marketing. Reviews most frequently reported behaviour-related outcomes or conducted some form of content analysis or analysis of the use of particular media. Research gaps were identified relating to community-based research, participation and empowerment, active media use (especially with respect to visual media und use of specific visual methodologies), and the use of salutogenic or assets-based approaches.

    Conclusion - The available research relating to digital media use in public health is dominated by studies relating to eHealth, telehealth or social marketing; emphasising the passive reception of messages and a focus on individual behaviour change approaches. Issues of quality and ethics need to be taken into account more consistently. Further research is needed with respect to more participatory methods, particularly those which would seek to use digital media as a means to harness individual and community assets.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages1066–1075
    Number of pages10
    JournalPublic Health
    Volume128
    Issue number12
    Early online date24 Nov 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

    Fingerprint

    Telemedicine
    Public Health
    Social Marketing
    Research
    Health
    Ethics
    Behavioral Medicine
    Health Communication
    Mass Media
    Textbooks
    Health Services Needs and Demand
    Health Promotion
    Health Education
    PubMed
    Research Design

    Keywords

    • digital media
    • visual methodologies
    • public health

    Cite this

    Clar, Christine ; Dyakova, M ; Curtis, K ; Dawson, C ; Donnelly, P ; Knifton, Lee ; Clarke, A . / Just telling and selling : current limitations in the use of digital media in public health: A scoping review. In: Public Health. 2014 ; Vol. 128, No. 12. pp. 1066–1075.
    @article{cf1120c9562a49e882fea0091a15b8b2,
    title = "Just telling and selling: current limitations in the use of digital media in public health: A scoping review",
    abstract = "Objective - To undertake a scoping review and to map research in the area of digital media use in public health.Study design - Scoping review.Methods - PubMed, PsycINFO, Google and major textbooks of public health communication and health psychology were searched for primary studies or systematic reviews examining the use of digital media in a health context. Searches focussed on studies published between the start of 2000 and the end of June 2013. Abstracts of reviews of public health interventions were examined with respect to target groups, health topic, intervention characteristics, media used, study design, issues of quality and ethics, and outcomes. To map this area of work fully, this information was supplemented by adding information from primary studies. Areas were identified where systematic review evidence was scarce or non-existent by comparing the final map with information from the reviews analysed.Results - 221 systematic reviews related to digital media use in a public health context were included. Most reviews included studies with an experimental design and general ‘at risk’ target populations. Specific settings were not specified in the majority of reviews. A large variety of health topics were covered. About a quarter of reviews did not specify a health topic but were concerned with broader issues of health promotion, disease prevention, or health education. Over half of the reviews focussed on eHealth and telemedicine, and another third were concerned with mass media – social marketing. Reviews most frequently reported behaviour-related outcomes or conducted some form of content analysis or analysis of the use of particular media. Research gaps were identified relating to community-based research, participation and empowerment, active media use (especially with respect to visual media und use of specific visual methodologies), and the use of salutogenic or assets-based approaches.Conclusion - The available research relating to digital media use in public health is dominated by studies relating to eHealth, telehealth or social marketing; emphasising the passive reception of messages and a focus on individual behaviour change approaches. Issues of quality and ethics need to be taken into account more consistently. Further research is needed with respect to more participatory methods, particularly those which would seek to use digital media as a means to harness individual and community assets.",
    keywords = "digital media, visual methodologies, public health",
    author = "Christine Clar and M Dyakova and K Curtis and C Dawson and P Donnelly and Lee Knifton and A Clarke",
    year = "2014",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1016/j.puhe.2014.09.009",
    language = "English",
    volume = "128",
    pages = "1066–1075",
    journal = "Public Health",
    issn = "0033-3506",
    number = "12",

    }

    Just telling and selling : current limitations in the use of digital media in public health: A scoping review. / Clar, Christine; Dyakova, M; Curtis, K; Dawson, C; Donnelly, P ; Knifton, Lee; Clarke, A .

    In: Public Health, Vol. 128, No. 12, 12.2014, p. 1066–1075.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Just telling and selling

    T2 - Public Health

    AU - Clar, Christine

    AU - Dyakova, M

    AU - Curtis, K

    AU - Dawson, C

    AU - Donnelly, P

    AU - Knifton, Lee

    AU - Clarke, A

    PY - 2014/12

    Y1 - 2014/12

    N2 - Objective - To undertake a scoping review and to map research in the area of digital media use in public health.Study design - Scoping review.Methods - PubMed, PsycINFO, Google and major textbooks of public health communication and health psychology were searched for primary studies or systematic reviews examining the use of digital media in a health context. Searches focussed on studies published between the start of 2000 and the end of June 2013. Abstracts of reviews of public health interventions were examined with respect to target groups, health topic, intervention characteristics, media used, study design, issues of quality and ethics, and outcomes. To map this area of work fully, this information was supplemented by adding information from primary studies. Areas were identified where systematic review evidence was scarce or non-existent by comparing the final map with information from the reviews analysed.Results - 221 systematic reviews related to digital media use in a public health context were included. Most reviews included studies with an experimental design and general ‘at risk’ target populations. Specific settings were not specified in the majority of reviews. A large variety of health topics were covered. About a quarter of reviews did not specify a health topic but were concerned with broader issues of health promotion, disease prevention, or health education. Over half of the reviews focussed on eHealth and telemedicine, and another third were concerned with mass media – social marketing. Reviews most frequently reported behaviour-related outcomes or conducted some form of content analysis or analysis of the use of particular media. Research gaps were identified relating to community-based research, participation and empowerment, active media use (especially with respect to visual media und use of specific visual methodologies), and the use of salutogenic or assets-based approaches.Conclusion - The available research relating to digital media use in public health is dominated by studies relating to eHealth, telehealth or social marketing; emphasising the passive reception of messages and a focus on individual behaviour change approaches. Issues of quality and ethics need to be taken into account more consistently. Further research is needed with respect to more participatory methods, particularly those which would seek to use digital media as a means to harness individual and community assets.

    AB - Objective - To undertake a scoping review and to map research in the area of digital media use in public health.Study design - Scoping review.Methods - PubMed, PsycINFO, Google and major textbooks of public health communication and health psychology were searched for primary studies or systematic reviews examining the use of digital media in a health context. Searches focussed on studies published between the start of 2000 and the end of June 2013. Abstracts of reviews of public health interventions were examined with respect to target groups, health topic, intervention characteristics, media used, study design, issues of quality and ethics, and outcomes. To map this area of work fully, this information was supplemented by adding information from primary studies. Areas were identified where systematic review evidence was scarce or non-existent by comparing the final map with information from the reviews analysed.Results - 221 systematic reviews related to digital media use in a public health context were included. Most reviews included studies with an experimental design and general ‘at risk’ target populations. Specific settings were not specified in the majority of reviews. A large variety of health topics were covered. About a quarter of reviews did not specify a health topic but were concerned with broader issues of health promotion, disease prevention, or health education. Over half of the reviews focussed on eHealth and telemedicine, and another third were concerned with mass media – social marketing. Reviews most frequently reported behaviour-related outcomes or conducted some form of content analysis or analysis of the use of particular media. Research gaps were identified relating to community-based research, participation and empowerment, active media use (especially with respect to visual media und use of specific visual methodologies), and the use of salutogenic or assets-based approaches.Conclusion - The available research relating to digital media use in public health is dominated by studies relating to eHealth, telehealth or social marketing; emphasising the passive reception of messages and a focus on individual behaviour change approaches. Issues of quality and ethics need to be taken into account more consistently. Further research is needed with respect to more participatory methods, particularly those which would seek to use digital media as a means to harness individual and community assets.

    KW - digital media

    KW - visual methodologies

    KW - public health

    U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.09.009

    DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.09.009

    M3 - Article

    VL - 128

    SP - 1066

    EP - 1075

    JO - Public Health

    JF - Public Health

    SN - 0033-3506

    IS - 12

    ER -