Jus quaesitum tertio: a res, not a right?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Until recently, the law pertaining to jus quaesitum tertio in Scotland was regarded as problematic. It was said to be 'behind the times', not least for the fact that the archaic Latin epitaph served to obfuscate the practical utility of 'third party rights'. In 2016, the Scottish Law Commission noted that '[C]lear, readily comprehensible terms are likely to benefit… the many people who draft and interpret contracts' and consequently recommended that steps ought to be taken to 'modernise' not only the substance of the law in this area, but also the language used to express that law. To that end, the Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Act 2017 was passed by the Scottish Parliament.
LanguageEnglish
Pages53-74
Number of pages21
JournalJuridical Review
Volume2019
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Scotland
Contracts
Law
Language
parliament
act
language

Keywords

  • jus quaesitum tertio
  • Scots law
  • contract law

Cite this

@article{afc143a4053c4dfe885cb8194162082a,
title = "Jus quaesitum tertio: a res, not a right?",
abstract = "Until recently, the law pertaining to jus quaesitum tertio in Scotland was regarded as problematic. It was said to be 'behind the times', not least for the fact that the archaic Latin epitaph served to obfuscate the practical utility of 'third party rights'. In 2016, the Scottish Law Commission noted that '[C]lear, readily comprehensible terms are likely to benefit… the many people who draft and interpret contracts' and consequently recommended that steps ought to be taken to 'modernise' not only the substance of the law in this area, but also the language used to express that law. To that end, the Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Act 2017 was passed by the Scottish Parliament.",
keywords = "jus quaesitum tertio, Scots law, contract law",
author = "Jonathan Brown",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "31",
language = "English",
volume = "2019",
pages = "53--74",
journal = "Juridical Review",
issn = "0022-6785",
number = "1",

}

Jus quaesitum tertio : a res, not a right? / Brown, Jonathan.

In: Juridical Review, Vol. 2019, No. 1, 31.03.2019, p. 53-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jus quaesitum tertio

T2 - Juridical Review

AU - Brown, Jonathan

PY - 2019/3/31

Y1 - 2019/3/31

N2 - Until recently, the law pertaining to jus quaesitum tertio in Scotland was regarded as problematic. It was said to be 'behind the times', not least for the fact that the archaic Latin epitaph served to obfuscate the practical utility of 'third party rights'. In 2016, the Scottish Law Commission noted that '[C]lear, readily comprehensible terms are likely to benefit… the many people who draft and interpret contracts' and consequently recommended that steps ought to be taken to 'modernise' not only the substance of the law in this area, but also the language used to express that law. To that end, the Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Act 2017 was passed by the Scottish Parliament.

AB - Until recently, the law pertaining to jus quaesitum tertio in Scotland was regarded as problematic. It was said to be 'behind the times', not least for the fact that the archaic Latin epitaph served to obfuscate the practical utility of 'third party rights'. In 2016, the Scottish Law Commission noted that '[C]lear, readily comprehensible terms are likely to benefit… the many people who draft and interpret contracts' and consequently recommended that steps ought to be taken to 'modernise' not only the substance of the law in this area, but also the language used to express that law. To that end, the Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Act 2017 was passed by the Scottish Parliament.

KW - jus quaesitum tertio

KW - Scots law

KW - contract law

M3 - Article

VL - 2019

SP - 53

EP - 74

JO - Juridical Review

JF - Juridical Review

SN - 0022-6785

IS - 1

ER -