Jugglers and tightrope walkers: the challenge of delivering quality community pharmacy services

Margaret C. Watson, Zoe C. Skea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

IntroductionThis is the first exploration of service providers’ attitudes and beliefs of quality and quality improvement in the community pharmacy setting in the UK.Materials and methodsA series of interviews and focus groups was conducted with stakeholders from the pharmacy profession in the UK. Interviews were semi-structured and conducted face-to-face or by telephone. Focus groups were conducted with naturally-occurring groups i.e. at pharmacy conferences. Interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed systematically using an interpretive approach.ResultsForty-two individuals participated across four focus groups and four interviews. A maximum variation sample was achieved in terms of pharmacist and pharmacy characteristics. Participants were generally positive about the need for quality and quality improvement and provided multifaceted and interlinked interpretations of quality and acknowledged its dynamic nature “quality moves forward”. The challenge of standardising practice whilst providing person-centred care emerged: “you don’t want to lose the personal touch, but you can’t have people having a variable experience and one day it’s fantastic and the next day it isn’t”. A variety of quality measurement methods were identified including direct observation (by internal and external agents) and feedback (mystery shoppers, colleagues, regulatory inspectors, service users), suggesting that standardisation was also needed in terms of future quality measurement. There was a tendency to report negative events as triggers for improvement. Future initiatives could adopt more positive approaches including positive deviants “There’s nothing more powerful than people who’ve come up with something really good sharing it with their other colleagues”.DiscussionThe results are being used to develop and evaluate future quality improvement initiatives in this sector. These are likely to be targeted at organisational, team and individual levels.
LanguageEnglish
Article numbere0200610
Number of pages15
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume31
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Community Pharmacy Services
Walkers
community service
focus groups
Focus Groups
interviews
Quality Improvement
Interviews
Telephone
Standardization
Feedback
Pharmacies
touch (sensation)
Touch
Pharmacists
standardization
stakeholders
Observation

Keywords

  • community pharmacy services
  • focus groups
  • UK
  • service providers attitudes

Cite this

@article{5ab46b8102884b27a6060e35a3bb1a63,
title = "Jugglers and tightrope walkers: the challenge of delivering quality community pharmacy services",
abstract = "IntroductionThis is the first exploration of service providers’ attitudes and beliefs of quality and quality improvement in the community pharmacy setting in the UK.Materials and methodsA series of interviews and focus groups was conducted with stakeholders from the pharmacy profession in the UK. Interviews were semi-structured and conducted face-to-face or by telephone. Focus groups were conducted with naturally-occurring groups i.e. at pharmacy conferences. Interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed systematically using an interpretive approach.ResultsForty-two individuals participated across four focus groups and four interviews. A maximum variation sample was achieved in terms of pharmacist and pharmacy characteristics. Participants were generally positive about the need for quality and quality improvement and provided multifaceted and interlinked interpretations of quality and acknowledged its dynamic nature “quality moves forward”. The challenge of standardising practice whilst providing person-centred care emerged: “you don’t want to lose the personal touch, but you can’t have people having a variable experience and one day it’s fantastic and the next day it isn’t”. A variety of quality measurement methods were identified including direct observation (by internal and external agents) and feedback (mystery shoppers, colleagues, regulatory inspectors, service users), suggesting that standardisation was also needed in terms of future quality measurement. There was a tendency to report negative events as triggers for improvement. Future initiatives could adopt more positive approaches including positive deviants “There’s nothing more powerful than people who’ve come up with something really good sharing it with their other colleagues”.DiscussionThe results are being used to develop and evaluate future quality improvement initiatives in this sector. These are likely to be targeted at organisational, team and individual levels.",
keywords = "community pharmacy services, focus groups, UK, service providers attitudes",
author = "Watson, {Margaret C.} and Skea, {Zoe C.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0200610",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
journal = "PLOS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

Jugglers and tightrope walkers : the challenge of delivering quality community pharmacy services. / Watson, Margaret C.; Skea, Zoe C.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 31, No. 7, e0200610, 23.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jugglers and tightrope walkers

T2 - PLOS One

AU - Watson, Margaret C.

AU - Skea, Zoe C.

PY - 2018/7/23

Y1 - 2018/7/23

N2 - IntroductionThis is the first exploration of service providers’ attitudes and beliefs of quality and quality improvement in the community pharmacy setting in the UK.Materials and methodsA series of interviews and focus groups was conducted with stakeholders from the pharmacy profession in the UK. Interviews were semi-structured and conducted face-to-face or by telephone. Focus groups were conducted with naturally-occurring groups i.e. at pharmacy conferences. Interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed systematically using an interpretive approach.ResultsForty-two individuals participated across four focus groups and four interviews. A maximum variation sample was achieved in terms of pharmacist and pharmacy characteristics. Participants were generally positive about the need for quality and quality improvement and provided multifaceted and interlinked interpretations of quality and acknowledged its dynamic nature “quality moves forward”. The challenge of standardising practice whilst providing person-centred care emerged: “you don’t want to lose the personal touch, but you can’t have people having a variable experience and one day it’s fantastic and the next day it isn’t”. A variety of quality measurement methods were identified including direct observation (by internal and external agents) and feedback (mystery shoppers, colleagues, regulatory inspectors, service users), suggesting that standardisation was also needed in terms of future quality measurement. There was a tendency to report negative events as triggers for improvement. Future initiatives could adopt more positive approaches including positive deviants “There’s nothing more powerful than people who’ve come up with something really good sharing it with their other colleagues”.DiscussionThe results are being used to develop and evaluate future quality improvement initiatives in this sector. These are likely to be targeted at organisational, team and individual levels.

AB - IntroductionThis is the first exploration of service providers’ attitudes and beliefs of quality and quality improvement in the community pharmacy setting in the UK.Materials and methodsA series of interviews and focus groups was conducted with stakeholders from the pharmacy profession in the UK. Interviews were semi-structured and conducted face-to-face or by telephone. Focus groups were conducted with naturally-occurring groups i.e. at pharmacy conferences. Interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed systematically using an interpretive approach.ResultsForty-two individuals participated across four focus groups and four interviews. A maximum variation sample was achieved in terms of pharmacist and pharmacy characteristics. Participants were generally positive about the need for quality and quality improvement and provided multifaceted and interlinked interpretations of quality and acknowledged its dynamic nature “quality moves forward”. The challenge of standardising practice whilst providing person-centred care emerged: “you don’t want to lose the personal touch, but you can’t have people having a variable experience and one day it’s fantastic and the next day it isn’t”. A variety of quality measurement methods were identified including direct observation (by internal and external agents) and feedback (mystery shoppers, colleagues, regulatory inspectors, service users), suggesting that standardisation was also needed in terms of future quality measurement. There was a tendency to report negative events as triggers for improvement. Future initiatives could adopt more positive approaches including positive deviants “There’s nothing more powerful than people who’ve come up with something really good sharing it with their other colleagues”.DiscussionThe results are being used to develop and evaluate future quality improvement initiatives in this sector. These are likely to be targeted at organisational, team and individual levels.

KW - community pharmacy services

KW - focus groups

KW - UK

KW - service providers attitudes

UR - https://journals.plos.org/plosone

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0200610

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0200610

M3 - Article

VL - 31

JO - PLOS One

JF - PLOS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e0200610

ER -