Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Judicial review and administrative justice

T.T. Arvind, Simon Halliday, Lindsay Stirton

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

There has been little dialogue or contact between the literatures on administrative justice and judicial review. This chapter argues that the two share common concerns and would benefit from closer engagement. Using a scheme based on Mary Douglas's grid-group cultural theory, it suggests that judicial review can and does discharge a variety of tasks that are fundamentally concerned with administrative justice. A closer focus on these tasks, and on the contribution they make to infusing justice into the functioning of administrative government, has the potential to productively reframe the concerns of judicial review scholarship and overcome the current 'clash of styles' that currently characterises theoretical work in public law.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOxford Handbook of Administrative Justice
EditorsJoe Tomlinson, Robert Thomas, Marc Hertogh, Richard Kirkham
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherOxford University Press
Chapter4
Pages67-88
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9780190903091
ISBN (Print)9780190903084
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Oct 2021

Keywords

  • judicial review
  • administrative justice
  • grid-group cultural theory
  • juristic method
  • public law theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Judicial review and administrative justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this