It doesn't matter what you teach?

J. Bebbington, Ian Thomson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There has been from time to time [see, for example, Adv. Public Interest Acc. 2 (1988) 71; Acc. Org. Society 16 (1991) 333; Acc. Educ. 3 (1994) 51; Acc. Aud. Accountability J. 8 (1995) 97; Crit. Perspect. Acc. 10 (1999) 833; Crit. Perspect. Acc. 12 (2001) 471] concern expressed about the state of accounting education and its potential link to the broader critical accounting project. This special issue revisits this theme focusing on the managerial undercurrent of accounting undergraduate education. This paper seeks to contribute to this debate by posing the suggestion/question that how one teaches is equally important as considering what you teach. In exploring the 'how' of teaching approaches, two educational theorists are drawn from Ivan Illich and Paulo Freire. In particular, we develop the idea that the 'hidden curriculum' [Deschooling Society, Calder and Boyars, London, 1971] of accounting education may be uncovered and problematized if one uses a dialogical approach to education [Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Pelican, London, 1996]. In seeking to expound our thesis, we draw from a number of teaching experiments which have explicitly sought to introduce more dialogical approaches to UK undergraduate accounting education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)609-628
Number of pages19
JournalCritical Perspectives On Accounting
Volume15
Issue number4-5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2004

Fingerprint

education
Teaching
public interest
curriculum
responsibility
experiment
Accounting education
Education
time
Society
Public interest
Pedagogy
Curriculum
Undergraduate
Experiment
Accountability
Critical accounting
Undergraduate education

Keywords

  • accounting education
  • dialogic
  • problem posing
  • UK
  • pedagogy
  • hidden curriculum

Cite this

Bebbington, J. ; Thomson, Ian. / It doesn't matter what you teach?. In: Critical Perspectives On Accounting. 2004 ; Vol. 15, No. 4-5. pp. 609-628.
@article{a5dd877a16dc49098f566cb4d31ed771,
title = "It doesn't matter what you teach?",
abstract = "There has been from time to time [see, for example, Adv. Public Interest Acc. 2 (1988) 71; Acc. Org. Society 16 (1991) 333; Acc. Educ. 3 (1994) 51; Acc. Aud. Accountability J. 8 (1995) 97; Crit. Perspect. Acc. 10 (1999) 833; Crit. Perspect. Acc. 12 (2001) 471] concern expressed about the state of accounting education and its potential link to the broader critical accounting project. This special issue revisits this theme focusing on the managerial undercurrent of accounting undergraduate education. This paper seeks to contribute to this debate by posing the suggestion/question that how one teaches is equally important as considering what you teach. In exploring the 'how' of teaching approaches, two educational theorists are drawn from Ivan Illich and Paulo Freire. In particular, we develop the idea that the 'hidden curriculum' [Deschooling Society, Calder and Boyars, London, 1971] of accounting education may be uncovered and problematized if one uses a dialogical approach to education [Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Pelican, London, 1996]. In seeking to expound our thesis, we draw from a number of teaching experiments which have explicitly sought to introduce more dialogical approaches to UK undergraduate accounting education.",
keywords = "accounting education, dialogic, problem posing, UK, pedagogy, hidden curriculum",
author = "J. Bebbington and Ian Thomson",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00049-2",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "609--628",
journal = "Critical Perspectives On Accounting",
issn = "1045-2354",
number = "4-5",

}

It doesn't matter what you teach? / Bebbington, J.; Thomson, Ian.

In: Critical Perspectives On Accounting, Vol. 15, No. 4-5, 07.2004, p. 609-628.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - It doesn't matter what you teach?

AU - Bebbington, J.

AU - Thomson, Ian

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - There has been from time to time [see, for example, Adv. Public Interest Acc. 2 (1988) 71; Acc. Org. Society 16 (1991) 333; Acc. Educ. 3 (1994) 51; Acc. Aud. Accountability J. 8 (1995) 97; Crit. Perspect. Acc. 10 (1999) 833; Crit. Perspect. Acc. 12 (2001) 471] concern expressed about the state of accounting education and its potential link to the broader critical accounting project. This special issue revisits this theme focusing on the managerial undercurrent of accounting undergraduate education. This paper seeks to contribute to this debate by posing the suggestion/question that how one teaches is equally important as considering what you teach. In exploring the 'how' of teaching approaches, two educational theorists are drawn from Ivan Illich and Paulo Freire. In particular, we develop the idea that the 'hidden curriculum' [Deschooling Society, Calder and Boyars, London, 1971] of accounting education may be uncovered and problematized if one uses a dialogical approach to education [Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Pelican, London, 1996]. In seeking to expound our thesis, we draw from a number of teaching experiments which have explicitly sought to introduce more dialogical approaches to UK undergraduate accounting education.

AB - There has been from time to time [see, for example, Adv. Public Interest Acc. 2 (1988) 71; Acc. Org. Society 16 (1991) 333; Acc. Educ. 3 (1994) 51; Acc. Aud. Accountability J. 8 (1995) 97; Crit. Perspect. Acc. 10 (1999) 833; Crit. Perspect. Acc. 12 (2001) 471] concern expressed about the state of accounting education and its potential link to the broader critical accounting project. This special issue revisits this theme focusing on the managerial undercurrent of accounting undergraduate education. This paper seeks to contribute to this debate by posing the suggestion/question that how one teaches is equally important as considering what you teach. In exploring the 'how' of teaching approaches, two educational theorists are drawn from Ivan Illich and Paulo Freire. In particular, we develop the idea that the 'hidden curriculum' [Deschooling Society, Calder and Boyars, London, 1971] of accounting education may be uncovered and problematized if one uses a dialogical approach to education [Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Pelican, London, 1996]. In seeking to expound our thesis, we draw from a number of teaching experiments which have explicitly sought to introduce more dialogical approaches to UK undergraduate accounting education.

KW - accounting education

KW - dialogic

KW - problem posing

KW - UK

KW - pedagogy

KW - hidden curriculum

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00049-2

U2 - 10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00049-2

DO - 10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00049-2

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 609

EP - 628

JO - Critical Perspectives On Accounting

JF - Critical Perspectives On Accounting

SN - 1045-2354

IS - 4-5

ER -