Is what you see what you get?: medical subject headings and their organizing work in the violence against women research literature

Jill R. McTavish, Diane Rasmussen Neal, C. Nadine Wathen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we argue that the broader definition of classification offered by sociologists and by Geoffrey Bowker and Susan Leigh Star addresses pertinent knowledge organization processes that we can use to investigate the moral, scientific, and aesthetic implications of different kinds of knowledge organization systems. We do so by systematically investigating the organization of the violence against women research literature by medical, allied health, and social sciences bibliographic databases and in particular by the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Our findings indicate that underlying these knowledge organization systems are certain discourses on violence against women that may reinforce a gender-neutral understanding of violence.
LanguageEnglish
Pages381-397
Number of pages17
JournalKnowledge Organization
Volume38
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sep 2011

Fingerprint

violence
organization
knowledge
health science
sociologist
aesthetics
social science
medicine
literature
discourse
gender

Keywords

  • scientific literature
  • women
  • violence
  • work
  • subject headings
  • medicine

Cite this

@article{db2fec0a4ff64528b30b4ec3f0f0e4d2,
title = "Is what you see what you get?: medical subject headings and their organizing work in the violence against women research literature",
abstract = "In this paper we argue that the broader definition of classification offered by sociologists and by Geoffrey Bowker and Susan Leigh Star addresses pertinent knowledge organization processes that we can use to investigate the moral, scientific, and aesthetic implications of different kinds of knowledge organization systems. We do so by systematically investigating the organization of the violence against women research literature by medical, allied health, and social sciences bibliographic databases and in particular by the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Our findings indicate that underlying these knowledge organization systems are certain discourses on violence against women that may reinforce a gender-neutral understanding of violence.",
keywords = "scientific literature, women, violence, work, subject headings, medicine",
author = "McTavish, {Jill R.} and Neal, {Diane Rasmussen} and Wathen, {C. Nadine}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "30",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "381--397",
journal = "Knowledge Organization",
issn = "0943-7444",
number = "5",

}

Is what you see what you get? medical subject headings and their organizing work in the violence against women research literature. / McTavish, Jill R.; Neal, Diane Rasmussen; Wathen, C. Nadine.

In: Knowledge Organization, Vol. 38, No. 5, 30.09.2011, p. 381-397.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is what you see what you get?

T2 - Knowledge Organization

AU - McTavish, Jill R.

AU - Neal, Diane Rasmussen

AU - Wathen, C. Nadine

PY - 2011/9/30

Y1 - 2011/9/30

N2 - In this paper we argue that the broader definition of classification offered by sociologists and by Geoffrey Bowker and Susan Leigh Star addresses pertinent knowledge organization processes that we can use to investigate the moral, scientific, and aesthetic implications of different kinds of knowledge organization systems. We do so by systematically investigating the organization of the violence against women research literature by medical, allied health, and social sciences bibliographic databases and in particular by the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Our findings indicate that underlying these knowledge organization systems are certain discourses on violence against women that may reinforce a gender-neutral understanding of violence.

AB - In this paper we argue that the broader definition of classification offered by sociologists and by Geoffrey Bowker and Susan Leigh Star addresses pertinent knowledge organization processes that we can use to investigate the moral, scientific, and aesthetic implications of different kinds of knowledge organization systems. We do so by systematically investigating the organization of the violence against women research literature by medical, allied health, and social sciences bibliographic databases and in particular by the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Our findings indicate that underlying these knowledge organization systems are certain discourses on violence against women that may reinforce a gender-neutral understanding of violence.

KW - scientific literature

KW - women

KW - violence

KW - work

KW - subject headings

KW - medicine

UR - http://www.ergon-verlag.de/en/bibliotheks--informationswissenschaft/knowledge-organization-journal/index.php

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 381

EP - 397

JO - Knowledge Organization

JF - Knowledge Organization

SN - 0943-7444

IS - 5

ER -