Is the social origin pay gap bigger than we thought? Identifying and acknowledging workers with undefined social origins in survey data

Michael Vallely*, Jeanette Findlay, Kristinn Hermannsson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article investigates whether empirical studies have underestimated the social origin pay gap by omitting respondents with undefined social origins. Specifically, individuals that were not assigned a social origin because the identity of their parental household was unclear, nobody was earning in the household, or the occupational identity of the main wage earner could not be identified. Data from the UK Quarterly Labour Force Survey is analysed to establish the prevalence of undefined social origins and the extent to which the socioeconomic characteristics of these groups are different from those who can be identified using the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC). The results show that 10.5% of the working age population have undefined social origins and that the labour market outcomes of these people are worse than those with defined social origins. Results show that omitting these respondents underestimates the range of the social origin pay gap and the number of people affected.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100952
Number of pages12
JournalResearch in Social Stratification and Mobility
Volume92
Early online date9 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2024

Keywords

  • Item non-response
  • Labour market outcomes
  • Pay gaps
  • Social origin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is the social origin pay gap bigger than we thought? Identifying and acknowledging workers with undefined social origins in survey data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this