Is the instrumented-pointer method of calibrating anatomical landmarks in 3D motion analysis reliable?

Gwenllian Fflur Tawy, Philip Rowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Instrumented-pointers are often used to calibrate anatomical landmarks in biomechanical analyses. However, little is known about the effect of altering the orientation of the pointer during calibration on the co-ordinates recorded. Incorrect positioning of a landmark influences the axes created, and thus the kinematic data recorded. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of the pointer method for anatomical calibration. Two points were drawn onto a fixed box to resemble knee joint epicondyles, then a custom-made pointer was used to define the positions of these landmarks in three-dimensions. Twenty different pointer-orientations were chosen, and the position of the pointer in each of these orientations was recorded 8 times. Euclidean distances between single points were calculated for both landmarks and compared statistically (α = 0.05). Average Euclidean distances between all reconstructed points were 3.2±1.4mm (range: 0.3-7.1mm) for one landmark and 3.3±1.5mm (range: 0.3-7.9mm) for the other. The x- and y-co-ordinates recorded differed statistically when the pointer was moved about the X and Y axes (anterior/posterior and superior/inferior to landmark) (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were found between co-ordinates recorded when the pointer was moved around the Z axes (p > 0.05). ICC values for all co-ordinates were excellent, highlighting the reliability of the method (ICC > 0.90). These results support this method of anatomical calibration; however, we recommend that pointers be consistently held in a neutral oriented position (where the handle is not anterior, posterior, superior or inferior to the landmark) during calibration, to reduce the likelihood of calibration errors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-209
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume53
Early online date19 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Calibration
Knee Joint
Biomechanical Phenomena
Kinematics
Motion analysis

Keywords

  • motion analysis
  • anatomical landmark calibration
  • subject calibration
  • protocol reliability
  • instrumented-pointer
  • orientation
  • euclidean distances
  • calibration errors

Cite this

@article{250e8e6a3c5c4e91be376557e7779c23,
title = "Is the instrumented-pointer method of calibrating anatomical landmarks in 3D motion analysis reliable?",
abstract = "Instrumented-pointers are often used to calibrate anatomical landmarks in biomechanical analyses. However, little is known about the effect of altering the orientation of the pointer during calibration on the co-ordinates recorded. Incorrect positioning of a landmark influences the axes created, and thus the kinematic data recorded. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of the pointer method for anatomical calibration. Two points were drawn onto a fixed box to resemble knee joint epicondyles, then a custom-made pointer was used to define the positions of these landmarks in three-dimensions. Twenty different pointer-orientations were chosen, and the position of the pointer in each of these orientations was recorded 8 times. Euclidean distances between single points were calculated for both landmarks and compared statistically (α = 0.05). Average Euclidean distances between all reconstructed points were 3.2±1.4mm (range: 0.3-7.1mm) for one landmark and 3.3±1.5mm (range: 0.3-7.9mm) for the other. The x- and y-co-ordinates recorded differed statistically when the pointer was moved about the X and Y axes (anterior/posterior and superior/inferior to landmark) (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were found between co-ordinates recorded when the pointer was moved around the Z axes (p > 0.05). ICC values for all co-ordinates were excellent, highlighting the reliability of the method (ICC > 0.90). These results support this method of anatomical calibration; however, we recommend that pointers be consistently held in a neutral oriented position (where the handle is not anterior, posterior, superior or inferior to the landmark) during calibration, to reduce the likelihood of calibration errors.",
keywords = "motion analysis, anatomical landmark calibration, subject calibration, protocol reliability, instrumented-pointer, orientation, euclidean distances, calibration errors",
author = "Tawy, {Gwenllian Fflur} and Philip Rowe",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.019",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "205--209",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",

}

Is the instrumented-pointer method of calibrating anatomical landmarks in 3D motion analysis reliable? / Tawy, Gwenllian Fflur; Rowe, Philip.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 53, 28.02.2017, p. 205-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the instrumented-pointer method of calibrating anatomical landmarks in 3D motion analysis reliable?

AU - Tawy, Gwenllian Fflur

AU - Rowe, Philip

PY - 2017/2/28

Y1 - 2017/2/28

N2 - Instrumented-pointers are often used to calibrate anatomical landmarks in biomechanical analyses. However, little is known about the effect of altering the orientation of the pointer during calibration on the co-ordinates recorded. Incorrect positioning of a landmark influences the axes created, and thus the kinematic data recorded. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of the pointer method for anatomical calibration. Two points were drawn onto a fixed box to resemble knee joint epicondyles, then a custom-made pointer was used to define the positions of these landmarks in three-dimensions. Twenty different pointer-orientations were chosen, and the position of the pointer in each of these orientations was recorded 8 times. Euclidean distances between single points were calculated for both landmarks and compared statistically (α = 0.05). Average Euclidean distances between all reconstructed points were 3.2±1.4mm (range: 0.3-7.1mm) for one landmark and 3.3±1.5mm (range: 0.3-7.9mm) for the other. The x- and y-co-ordinates recorded differed statistically when the pointer was moved about the X and Y axes (anterior/posterior and superior/inferior to landmark) (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were found between co-ordinates recorded when the pointer was moved around the Z axes (p > 0.05). ICC values for all co-ordinates were excellent, highlighting the reliability of the method (ICC > 0.90). These results support this method of anatomical calibration; however, we recommend that pointers be consistently held in a neutral oriented position (where the handle is not anterior, posterior, superior or inferior to the landmark) during calibration, to reduce the likelihood of calibration errors.

AB - Instrumented-pointers are often used to calibrate anatomical landmarks in biomechanical analyses. However, little is known about the effect of altering the orientation of the pointer during calibration on the co-ordinates recorded. Incorrect positioning of a landmark influences the axes created, and thus the kinematic data recorded. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of the pointer method for anatomical calibration. Two points were drawn onto a fixed box to resemble knee joint epicondyles, then a custom-made pointer was used to define the positions of these landmarks in three-dimensions. Twenty different pointer-orientations were chosen, and the position of the pointer in each of these orientations was recorded 8 times. Euclidean distances between single points were calculated for both landmarks and compared statistically (α = 0.05). Average Euclidean distances between all reconstructed points were 3.2±1.4mm (range: 0.3-7.1mm) for one landmark and 3.3±1.5mm (range: 0.3-7.9mm) for the other. The x- and y-co-ordinates recorded differed statistically when the pointer was moved about the X and Y axes (anterior/posterior and superior/inferior to landmark) (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were found between co-ordinates recorded when the pointer was moved around the Z axes (p > 0.05). ICC values for all co-ordinates were excellent, highlighting the reliability of the method (ICC > 0.90). These results support this method of anatomical calibration; however, we recommend that pointers be consistently held in a neutral oriented position (where the handle is not anterior, posterior, superior or inferior to the landmark) during calibration, to reduce the likelihood of calibration errors.

KW - motion analysis

KW - anatomical landmark calibration

KW - subject calibration

KW - protocol reliability

KW - instrumented-pointer

KW - orientation

KW - euclidean distances

KW - calibration errors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011000715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00219290

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.019

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.019

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 205

EP - 209

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

ER -