Irregular migrants and the human right to health care: a case-study of health-care provision for irregular migrants in France and the UK

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

International human rights law attaches the right of health care to the person. States, however, predicate this right on membership in the national community and access to publicly subsidised health care is normally contingent on national membership. With this in mind, this article considers the significance of a human rights approach to access to health care and undertakes a comparative study of health-care provision for irregular migrants in France and the UK. Irregular migrants are ineligible for national membership because they have breached immigration laws. Consequently their right to health care may only arise from international human rights law. This comparative study, however, shows that states resist the idea of a right to health care for people they regard as a threat to national sovereignty. Yet the author posits that the exercise of the government's immigration power may be reconciled with the realisation of irregular migrants' human right to health care.
LanguageEnglish
Pages357-374
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Law in Context
Volume7
Issue numberSpecial issue 03
Early online date20 Sep 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

human rights
migrant
France
health care
immigration law
Law
sovereignty
immigration
threat
human being
community

Keywords

  • rights of the individual
  • UK
  • France
  • Irregular migrants
  • health care

Cite this

@article{f157adc2394a49428f9b4ab04d3dc338,
title = "Irregular migrants and the human right to health care: a case-study of health-care provision for irregular migrants in France and the UK",
abstract = "International human rights law attaches the right of health care to the person. States, however, predicate this right on membership in the national community and access to publicly subsidised health care is normally contingent on national membership. With this in mind, this article considers the significance of a human rights approach to access to health care and undertakes a comparative study of health-care provision for irregular migrants in France and the UK. Irregular migrants are ineligible for national membership because they have breached immigration laws. Consequently their right to health care may only arise from international human rights law. This comparative study, however, shows that states resist the idea of a right to health care for people they regard as a threat to national sovereignty. Yet the author posits that the exercise of the government's immigration power may be reconciled with the realisation of irregular migrants' human right to health care.",
keywords = "rights of the individual, UK, France, Irregular migrants, health care",
author = "{Da Lomba}, Sylvie",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1017/S1744552311000188",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "357--374",
journal = "International Journal of Law in Context",
issn = "1744-5523",
number = "Special issue 03",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Irregular migrants and the human right to health care

T2 - International Journal of Law in Context

AU - Da Lomba, Sylvie

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - International human rights law attaches the right of health care to the person. States, however, predicate this right on membership in the national community and access to publicly subsidised health care is normally contingent on national membership. With this in mind, this article considers the significance of a human rights approach to access to health care and undertakes a comparative study of health-care provision for irregular migrants in France and the UK. Irregular migrants are ineligible for national membership because they have breached immigration laws. Consequently their right to health care may only arise from international human rights law. This comparative study, however, shows that states resist the idea of a right to health care for people they regard as a threat to national sovereignty. Yet the author posits that the exercise of the government's immigration power may be reconciled with the realisation of irregular migrants' human right to health care.

AB - International human rights law attaches the right of health care to the person. States, however, predicate this right on membership in the national community and access to publicly subsidised health care is normally contingent on national membership. With this in mind, this article considers the significance of a human rights approach to access to health care and undertakes a comparative study of health-care provision for irregular migrants in France and the UK. Irregular migrants are ineligible for national membership because they have breached immigration laws. Consequently their right to health care may only arise from international human rights law. This comparative study, however, shows that states resist the idea of a right to health care for people they regard as a threat to national sovereignty. Yet the author posits that the exercise of the government's immigration power may be reconciled with the realisation of irregular migrants' human right to health care.

KW - rights of the individual

KW - UK

KW - France

KW - Irregular migrants

KW - health care

U2 - 10.1017/S1744552311000188

DO - 10.1017/S1744552311000188

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 357

EP - 374

JO - International Journal of Law in Context

JF - International Journal of Law in Context

SN - 1744-5523

IS - Special issue 03

ER -