Interviewer behaviour, interviewee self-esteem and response change in simulated forensic interviews

Allan McGroarty, James S. Baxter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effects of interviewer behaviour and interviewee self-esteem on response change were investigated in a simulated forensic interview. In line with Gudjonsson and Clark's (1986) model of interrogative suggestibility, it was hypothesised that increased rates of response change would be associated with an unsupportive, disapproving interviewer manner and low levels of self-esteem. Following presentation of a video taped event, low and high self-esteem participants (N = 83) were interviewed by a male interviewer portraying either a Friendly or Abrupt manner. Participants in the Abrupt conditions made significantly more response changes in response to negative feedback than those in the Friendly conditions. Contrary to previous studies, level of self-esteem did not influence this measure nor did it interact with interviewer behaviour. However, low self-esteem participants rated the interview as significantly more difficult than did high self-esteem participants. The results support some previous work and indicate that negative feedback affects response change even when questions are not overtly leading.
LanguageEnglish
Pages642-646
Number of pages5
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Self Concept
Interviews
Epidemiologic Effect Modifiers

Keywords

  • interrogative pressure
  • negative feedback
  • interrogative suggestibility
  • forensic interviews
  • self-esteem

Cite this

@article{892ca8be66454b48b3a429b0bba4b958,
title = "Interviewer behaviour, interviewee self-esteem and response change in simulated forensic interviews",
abstract = "The effects of interviewer behaviour and interviewee self-esteem on response change were investigated in a simulated forensic interview. In line with Gudjonsson and Clark's (1986) model of interrogative suggestibility, it was hypothesised that increased rates of response change would be associated with an unsupportive, disapproving interviewer manner and low levels of self-esteem. Following presentation of a video taped event, low and high self-esteem participants (N = 83) were interviewed by a male interviewer portraying either a Friendly or Abrupt manner. Participants in the Abrupt conditions made significantly more response changes in response to negative feedback than those in the Friendly conditions. Contrary to previous studies, level of self-esteem did not influence this measure nor did it interact with interviewer behaviour. However, low self-esteem participants rated the interview as significantly more difficult than did high self-esteem participants. The results support some previous work and indicate that negative feedback affects response change even when questions are not overtly leading.",
keywords = "interrogative pressure, negative feedback, interrogative suggestibility, forensic interviews, self-esteem",
author = "Allan McGroarty and Baxter, {James S.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.024",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "642--646",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
number = "6",

}

Interviewer behaviour, interviewee self-esteem and response change in simulated forensic interviews. / McGroarty, Allan; Baxter, James S.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 47, No. 6, 10.2009, p. 642-646.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interviewer behaviour, interviewee self-esteem and response change in simulated forensic interviews

AU - McGroarty, Allan

AU - Baxter, James S.

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - The effects of interviewer behaviour and interviewee self-esteem on response change were investigated in a simulated forensic interview. In line with Gudjonsson and Clark's (1986) model of interrogative suggestibility, it was hypothesised that increased rates of response change would be associated with an unsupportive, disapproving interviewer manner and low levels of self-esteem. Following presentation of a video taped event, low and high self-esteem participants (N = 83) were interviewed by a male interviewer portraying either a Friendly or Abrupt manner. Participants in the Abrupt conditions made significantly more response changes in response to negative feedback than those in the Friendly conditions. Contrary to previous studies, level of self-esteem did not influence this measure nor did it interact with interviewer behaviour. However, low self-esteem participants rated the interview as significantly more difficult than did high self-esteem participants. The results support some previous work and indicate that negative feedback affects response change even when questions are not overtly leading.

AB - The effects of interviewer behaviour and interviewee self-esteem on response change were investigated in a simulated forensic interview. In line with Gudjonsson and Clark's (1986) model of interrogative suggestibility, it was hypothesised that increased rates of response change would be associated with an unsupportive, disapproving interviewer manner and low levels of self-esteem. Following presentation of a video taped event, low and high self-esteem participants (N = 83) were interviewed by a male interviewer portraying either a Friendly or Abrupt manner. Participants in the Abrupt conditions made significantly more response changes in response to negative feedback than those in the Friendly conditions. Contrary to previous studies, level of self-esteem did not influence this measure nor did it interact with interviewer behaviour. However, low self-esteem participants rated the interview as significantly more difficult than did high self-esteem participants. The results support some previous work and indicate that negative feedback affects response change even when questions are not overtly leading.

KW - interrogative pressure

KW - negative feedback

KW - interrogative suggestibility

KW - forensic interviews

KW - self-esteem

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.024

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.024

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 642

EP - 646

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

T2 - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 6

ER -