Interventions to promote walking

systematic review

David Ogilvie, Charles E. Foster, Helen Rothnie, Nick Cavill, Val Hamilton, Claire F. Fitzsimons, Nanette Mutrie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

423 Citations (Scopus)
42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Assesses the effects of interventions to promote walking in individuals and populations. Uses published and unpublished reports in any language identified by searching 25 electronic databases, by searching websites, reference lists, and existing systematic reviews, and by contacting experts. ystematic search for and appraisal ofcontrolled before and after studies of the effects of anytype of intervention on how much people walk, thedistribution of effects on walking between social groups,and any associated effects on overall physical activity,fitness, risk factors for disease, health, and wellbeing. We included 19 randomised controlled trials and29 non-randomised controlled studies. Interventionstailored to people's needs, targeted at the most sedentaryor at those most motivated to change, and deliveredeither at the level of the individual (brief advice,supported use of pedometers, telecommunications) orhousehold (individualised marketing) or through groups,can encourage people to walk more, although thesustainability, generalisability, and clinical benefits ofmany of these approaches are uncertain. Evidence for theeffectiveness of interventions applied to workplaces, schools, communities, or areas typically depends onisolated studies or subgroup analysis. The most successful interventions could increase walking among targeted participants by up to 30-60 minutes a week on average, at least in the short term. From a perspective of improving population health, much of the research currently provides evidence of efficacy rather than effectiveness. Nevertheless, interventions to promote walking could contribute substantially towards increasing the activity levels of themost sedentary.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume334
Issue number1204
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Walking
Telecommunications
Physical Fitness
Health
Marketing
Workplace
Population
Language
Databases
Research
Non-Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • walking
  • physical activity
  • sports science
  • pedometer

Cite this

Ogilvie, D., Foster, C. E., Rothnie, H., Cavill, N., Hamilton, V., Fitzsimons, C. F., & Mutrie, N. (2007). Interventions to promote walking: systematic review. British Medical Journal, 334(1204), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39198.722720.BE
Ogilvie, David ; Foster, Charles E. ; Rothnie, Helen ; Cavill, Nick ; Hamilton, Val ; Fitzsimons, Claire F. ; Mutrie, Nanette. / Interventions to promote walking : systematic review. In: British Medical Journal. 2007 ; Vol. 334, No. 1204. pp. 1-10.
@article{420836c51aeb4548be63f5f230f4ef34,
title = "Interventions to promote walking: systematic review",
abstract = "Assesses the effects of interventions to promote walking in individuals and populations. Uses published and unpublished reports in any language identified by searching 25 electronic databases, by searching websites, reference lists, and existing systematic reviews, and by contacting experts. ystematic search for and appraisal ofcontrolled before and after studies of the effects of anytype of intervention on how much people walk, thedistribution of effects on walking between social groups,and any associated effects on overall physical activity,fitness, risk factors for disease, health, and wellbeing. We included 19 randomised controlled trials and29 non-randomised controlled studies. Interventionstailored to people's needs, targeted at the most sedentaryor at those most motivated to change, and deliveredeither at the level of the individual (brief advice,supported use of pedometers, telecommunications) orhousehold (individualised marketing) or through groups,can encourage people to walk more, although thesustainability, generalisability, and clinical benefits ofmany of these approaches are uncertain. Evidence for theeffectiveness of interventions applied to workplaces, schools, communities, or areas typically depends onisolated studies or subgroup analysis. The most successful interventions could increase walking among targeted participants by up to 30-60 minutes a week on average, at least in the short term. From a perspective of improving population health, much of the research currently provides evidence of efficacy rather than effectiveness. Nevertheless, interventions to promote walking could contribute substantially towards increasing the activity levels of themost sedentary.",
keywords = "walking, physical activity, sports science, pedometer",
author = "David Ogilvie and Foster, {Charles E.} and Helen Rothnie and Nick Cavill and Val Hamilton and Fitzsimons, {Claire F.} and Nanette Mutrie",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1136/bmj.39198.722720.BE",
language = "English",
volume = "334",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "BMJ",
issn = "0959-8138",
number = "1204",

}

Ogilvie, D, Foster, CE, Rothnie, H, Cavill, N, Hamilton, V, Fitzsimons, CF & Mutrie, N 2007, 'Interventions to promote walking: systematic review', British Medical Journal, vol. 334, no. 1204, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39198.722720.BE

Interventions to promote walking : systematic review. / Ogilvie, David; Foster, Charles E.; Rothnie, Helen; Cavill, Nick; Hamilton, Val; Fitzsimons, Claire F.; Mutrie, Nanette.

In: British Medical Journal, Vol. 334, No. 1204, 07.06.2007, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interventions to promote walking

T2 - systematic review

AU - Ogilvie, David

AU - Foster, Charles E.

AU - Rothnie, Helen

AU - Cavill, Nick

AU - Hamilton, Val

AU - Fitzsimons, Claire F.

AU - Mutrie, Nanette

PY - 2007/6/7

Y1 - 2007/6/7

N2 - Assesses the effects of interventions to promote walking in individuals and populations. Uses published and unpublished reports in any language identified by searching 25 electronic databases, by searching websites, reference lists, and existing systematic reviews, and by contacting experts. ystematic search for and appraisal ofcontrolled before and after studies of the effects of anytype of intervention on how much people walk, thedistribution of effects on walking between social groups,and any associated effects on overall physical activity,fitness, risk factors for disease, health, and wellbeing. We included 19 randomised controlled trials and29 non-randomised controlled studies. Interventionstailored to people's needs, targeted at the most sedentaryor at those most motivated to change, and deliveredeither at the level of the individual (brief advice,supported use of pedometers, telecommunications) orhousehold (individualised marketing) or through groups,can encourage people to walk more, although thesustainability, generalisability, and clinical benefits ofmany of these approaches are uncertain. Evidence for theeffectiveness of interventions applied to workplaces, schools, communities, or areas typically depends onisolated studies or subgroup analysis. The most successful interventions could increase walking among targeted participants by up to 30-60 minutes a week on average, at least in the short term. From a perspective of improving population health, much of the research currently provides evidence of efficacy rather than effectiveness. Nevertheless, interventions to promote walking could contribute substantially towards increasing the activity levels of themost sedentary.

AB - Assesses the effects of interventions to promote walking in individuals and populations. Uses published and unpublished reports in any language identified by searching 25 electronic databases, by searching websites, reference lists, and existing systematic reviews, and by contacting experts. ystematic search for and appraisal ofcontrolled before and after studies of the effects of anytype of intervention on how much people walk, thedistribution of effects on walking between social groups,and any associated effects on overall physical activity,fitness, risk factors for disease, health, and wellbeing. We included 19 randomised controlled trials and29 non-randomised controlled studies. Interventionstailored to people's needs, targeted at the most sedentaryor at those most motivated to change, and deliveredeither at the level of the individual (brief advice,supported use of pedometers, telecommunications) orhousehold (individualised marketing) or through groups,can encourage people to walk more, although thesustainability, generalisability, and clinical benefits ofmany of these approaches are uncertain. Evidence for theeffectiveness of interventions applied to workplaces, schools, communities, or areas typically depends onisolated studies or subgroup analysis. The most successful interventions could increase walking among targeted participants by up to 30-60 minutes a week on average, at least in the short term. From a perspective of improving population health, much of the research currently provides evidence of efficacy rather than effectiveness. Nevertheless, interventions to promote walking could contribute substantially towards increasing the activity levels of themost sedentary.

KW - walking

KW - physical activity

KW - sports science

KW - pedometer

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.39198.722720.BE

DO - 10.1136/bmj.39198.722720.BE

M3 - Article

VL - 334

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - BMJ

JF - BMJ

SN - 0959-8138

IS - 1204

ER -

Ogilvie D, Foster CE, Rothnie H, Cavill N, Hamilton V, Fitzsimons CF et al. Interventions to promote walking: systematic review. British Medical Journal. 2007 Jun 7;334(1204):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39198.722720.BE