International spectrum management regime: is gridlock blocking flexible spectrum property rights?

M Mohamed Ali Elmoghazi Ali, Jason Whalley, James Irvine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to examine the influence of the international spectrum management regime on the introduction of flexibility in the national allocation of radiocommunication services. This is achieved through focusing on the main elements of the international regime. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative inductive methodology is adopted that examines the different elements of the international radiocommunication service allocation framework. Data are drawn from 66 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders who are actively involved in International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector discussions. Findings: The international radio regulations (RR) are perceived to be more of a framework for harmonisation that does not constrain the flexibility of countries. Countries are only restricted on their borders with their neighbours, and flexibility is already facilitated through a range of different measures. Moreover, several elements of the RR can be used to achieve both, i.e. to promote flexibility and to restrict the decisions of others. Practical implications: The international spectrum management regime is not one of the reasons for the unsuccessful practical application of the flexible spectrum property rights concept. This suggests the need for reviewing whether there still is a need for such a concept given the increasing importance of global harmonisation and economies of scales. Originality/value: This paper sheds light on spectrum property rights from the perspective of the international spectrum management regime. Such a perspective is largely overlooked in the on-going current debate.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-13
Number of pages13
JournalDigital Policy, Regulation and Governance
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 13 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Radio communication
Telecommunication
Property rights
Spectrum management
Harmonization

Keywords

  • allocation
  • ITU-R
  • radiocommunication

Cite this

@article{3ac913692e0b487fa66329987a03fef2,
title = "International spectrum management regime: is gridlock blocking flexible spectrum property rights?",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper aims to examine the influence of the international spectrum management regime on the introduction of flexibility in the national allocation of radiocommunication services. This is achieved through focusing on the main elements of the international regime. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative inductive methodology is adopted that examines the different elements of the international radiocommunication service allocation framework. Data are drawn from 66 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders who are actively involved in International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector discussions. Findings: The international radio regulations (RR) are perceived to be more of a framework for harmonisation that does not constrain the flexibility of countries. Countries are only restricted on their borders with their neighbours, and flexibility is already facilitated through a range of different measures. Moreover, several elements of the RR can be used to achieve both, i.e. to promote flexibility and to restrict the decisions of others. Practical implications: The international spectrum management regime is not one of the reasons for the unsuccessful practical application of the flexible spectrum property rights concept. This suggests the need for reviewing whether there still is a need for such a concept given the increasing importance of global harmonisation and economies of scales. Originality/value: This paper sheds light on spectrum property rights from the perspective of the international spectrum management regime. Such a perspective is largely overlooked in the on-going current debate.",
keywords = "allocation, ITU-R, radiocommunication",
author = "{Mohamed Ali Elmoghazi Ali}, M and Jason Whalley and James Irvine",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1108/DPRG-08-2016-0039",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance",
issn = "2398-5038",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "2",

}

International spectrum management regime : is gridlock blocking flexible spectrum property rights? / Mohamed Ali Elmoghazi Ali, M; Whalley, Jason; Irvine, James.

In: Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, Vol. 19, No. 2, 13.03.2017, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - International spectrum management regime

T2 - Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance

AU - Mohamed Ali Elmoghazi Ali,M

AU - Whalley,Jason

AU - Irvine,James

PY - 2017/3/13

Y1 - 2017/3/13

N2 - Purpose: This paper aims to examine the influence of the international spectrum management regime on the introduction of flexibility in the national allocation of radiocommunication services. This is achieved through focusing on the main elements of the international regime. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative inductive methodology is adopted that examines the different elements of the international radiocommunication service allocation framework. Data are drawn from 66 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders who are actively involved in International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector discussions. Findings: The international radio regulations (RR) are perceived to be more of a framework for harmonisation that does not constrain the flexibility of countries. Countries are only restricted on their borders with their neighbours, and flexibility is already facilitated through a range of different measures. Moreover, several elements of the RR can be used to achieve both, i.e. to promote flexibility and to restrict the decisions of others. Practical implications: The international spectrum management regime is not one of the reasons for the unsuccessful practical application of the flexible spectrum property rights concept. This suggests the need for reviewing whether there still is a need for such a concept given the increasing importance of global harmonisation and economies of scales. Originality/value: This paper sheds light on spectrum property rights from the perspective of the international spectrum management regime. Such a perspective is largely overlooked in the on-going current debate.

AB - Purpose: This paper aims to examine the influence of the international spectrum management regime on the introduction of flexibility in the national allocation of radiocommunication services. This is achieved through focusing on the main elements of the international regime. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative inductive methodology is adopted that examines the different elements of the international radiocommunication service allocation framework. Data are drawn from 66 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders who are actively involved in International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector discussions. Findings: The international radio regulations (RR) are perceived to be more of a framework for harmonisation that does not constrain the flexibility of countries. Countries are only restricted on their borders with their neighbours, and flexibility is already facilitated through a range of different measures. Moreover, several elements of the RR can be used to achieve both, i.e. to promote flexibility and to restrict the decisions of others. Practical implications: The international spectrum management regime is not one of the reasons for the unsuccessful practical application of the flexible spectrum property rights concept. This suggests the need for reviewing whether there still is a need for such a concept given the increasing importance of global harmonisation and economies of scales. Originality/value: This paper sheds light on spectrum property rights from the perspective of the international spectrum management regime. Such a perspective is largely overlooked in the on-going current debate.

KW - allocation

KW - ITU-R

KW - radiocommunication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016417488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/DPRG-08-2016-0039

DO - 10.1108/DPRG-08-2016-0039

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance

JF - Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance

SN - 2398-5038

IS - 2

ER -