Interference and generation cycles

G.D. Ruxton, William Gurney, A.M. de Roos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

118 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we re-examine the derivation of an interference limited functional response due to Beddington (1975 J. Anim. Ecol.44, 331–340) and extend his treatment to more realistic models of the interference process. We study the dynamic effects of interference in the context of a structured population model and show that the stabilising effect of interference against paradox of enrichment cycles is unaffected by age-structure. We also demonstrate that single generation cycles are much more weakly affected by interference than prey-escape cycles. Thus the net effect of weak interference is to prevent single generation cycles from being masked by the prey-escape cycles which would otherwise dominate the population dynamics.
LanguageEnglish
Pages235-253
Number of pages19
JournalTheoretical Population Biology
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1992

Fingerprint

age structure
population dynamics
functional response
effect

Keywords

  • interference process
  • population model
  • enrichment cycles
  • prey-escape cycles

Cite this

Ruxton, G.D. ; Gurney, William ; de Roos, A.M. / Interference and generation cycles. In: Theoretical Population Biology. 1992 ; Vol. 42, No. 3. pp. 235-253.
@article{398b3b72558a40e5afc81d171dbc529b,
title = "Interference and generation cycles",
abstract = "In this paper we re-examine the derivation of an interference limited functional response due to Beddington (1975 J. Anim. Ecol.44, 331–340) and extend his treatment to more realistic models of the interference process. We study the dynamic effects of interference in the context of a structured population model and show that the stabilising effect of interference against paradox of enrichment cycles is unaffected by age-structure. We also demonstrate that single generation cycles are much more weakly affected by interference than prey-escape cycles. Thus the net effect of weak interference is to prevent single generation cycles from being masked by the prey-escape cycles which would otherwise dominate the population dynamics.",
keywords = "interference process, population model, enrichment cycles, prey-escape cycles",
author = "G.D. Ruxton and William Gurney and {de Roos}, A.M.",
year = "1992",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/0040-5809(92)90014-K",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "235--253",
journal = "Theoretical Population Biology",
issn = "0040-5809",
number = "3",

}

Interference and generation cycles. / Ruxton, G.D.; Gurney, William; de Roos, A.M.

In: Theoretical Population Biology, Vol. 42, No. 3, 12.1992, p. 235-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interference and generation cycles

AU - Ruxton, G.D.

AU - Gurney, William

AU - de Roos, A.M.

PY - 1992/12

Y1 - 1992/12

N2 - In this paper we re-examine the derivation of an interference limited functional response due to Beddington (1975 J. Anim. Ecol.44, 331–340) and extend his treatment to more realistic models of the interference process. We study the dynamic effects of interference in the context of a structured population model and show that the stabilising effect of interference against paradox of enrichment cycles is unaffected by age-structure. We also demonstrate that single generation cycles are much more weakly affected by interference than prey-escape cycles. Thus the net effect of weak interference is to prevent single generation cycles from being masked by the prey-escape cycles which would otherwise dominate the population dynamics.

AB - In this paper we re-examine the derivation of an interference limited functional response due to Beddington (1975 J. Anim. Ecol.44, 331–340) and extend his treatment to more realistic models of the interference process. We study the dynamic effects of interference in the context of a structured population model and show that the stabilising effect of interference against paradox of enrichment cycles is unaffected by age-structure. We also demonstrate that single generation cycles are much more weakly affected by interference than prey-escape cycles. Thus the net effect of weak interference is to prevent single generation cycles from being masked by the prey-escape cycles which would otherwise dominate the population dynamics.

KW - interference process

KW - population model

KW - enrichment cycles

KW - prey-escape cycles

U2 - 10.1016/0040-5809(92)90014-K

DO - 10.1016/0040-5809(92)90014-K

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 235

EP - 253

JO - Theoretical Population Biology

T2 - Theoretical Population Biology

JF - Theoretical Population Biology

SN - 0040-5809

IS - 3

ER -