Integrating evidence and public engagement in policy work: an empirical examination of three UK policy organisations

Clementine Hill O’Connor, Katherine Smith, Ellen Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Alongside efforts to improve evidence use in policy, grassroots demands and governance-driven democratisation are informing an ever-increasing range of public engagement processes in UK policy. This article explores how these simultaneous efforts intersect within three policy organisations working at different levels of UK policy: local (Sheffield City Council), regional (Greater Manchester Combined Authority) and national (devolved) (Scottish Government). Employing documentary analysis and 51 interviews with individuals working in these organisations, we argue that there are organisational similarities in approaches to evidence and engagement, including: conceiving of both ‘data’ (statistics tracked by internal analysts) and ‘evidence’ (external analysis) in primarily quantified terms; and a tendency to limit the authority of publics to advising and consulting on predefined issues. Yet, we also find growing interest in more in-depth understandings of publics (for example, via ‘lived experiences’) but uncertainty about how to use these qualitative insights in settings that have institutionalised quantitative approaches to evidence. We identify four distinct responses: (1) prioritising public engagement; (2) strategically using public engagement and evidence to support policy proposals; (3) prioritising quantified evidence and data; and (4) attempting to integrate these distinct knowledge types. Surprisingly (given the organisational importance afforded to metrics), we categorised most interviewees in Cluster 4. Finally, we explore how interviewees described trying to do this kind of integration work, before reflecting on the promise and limitations of the various mechanisms that interviewees identified.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-294
Number of pages24
JournalPolicy and Politics
Volume51
Issue number2
Early online date11 Jan 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Keywords

  • management, monitoring, policy and law
  • public administration
  • sociology and political science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integrating evidence and public engagement in policy work: an empirical examination of three UK policy organisations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this