Institutions and mechanisms to facilitate private enforcement across the EU: specialist courts and follow-on actions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This article outlines a key aspect of a recent AHRC funded project concerning the application of competition law in the national courts of the European Union Member States. This was an empirical project with rapporteurs for 27 Member States entrusted with the task of identifying competition case-law judgments in their national courts in the period between 1 May 1999 and 1 May 2012. Each national report also outlined key aspects of the wider legal context within which private enforcement of competition law
operates in that jurisdiction. The general hypothesis that underlies the dual approach to the project is that private enforcement practice across the legal systems of the EU Member States may at least partly be explained by the existence or availability of particular institutions, mechanisms and cultural factors in relation to the particular legal system. In this article we considered two particular institutions or mechanisms: the specialist court/tribunal and the competition litigation follow-on action mechanism. The picture presented by the data together with the national reports is one of evolving national stories and contexts - which appear to be affected to a greater or lesser extent in different Member States by a combination of national cultures, competition law architecture and civil procedural rules. It is not claimed that there are any direct causal relationships between the insights provided by the empirical data and the national narratives on institutional mechanisms, but the analysis indicates ways and contexts in which competition litigation cultures may develop in the wake of specific institutional mechanisms. The article concludes that it is inevitable that patterns of competition litigation will continue to vary considerably across the EU for the foreseeable future, reflecting, to a great extent, the variable landscape of legal and institutional provision for private enforcement in the EU Member States.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationConcorrenza e Mercato 2014
Subtitle of host publicationAntitrust, regulation, consumer welfare, intellectual property
EditorsMarcello Clarich, Fabiana Di Porto, Gustavo Ghidini, Piergaetano Marchetti
Pages139-181
Number of pages43
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

EU
EU member state
legal system
Law
national culture
case law
cultural factors
jurisdiction
narrative

Keywords

  • competition law
  • antitrust law
  • private inforcement
  • institutions
  • specialist courts

Cite this

Rodger, B. (2014). Institutions and mechanisms to facilitate private enforcement across the EU: specialist courts and follow-on actions. In M. Clarich, F. Di Porto, G. Ghidini, & P. Marchetti (Eds.), Concorrenza e Mercato 2014: Antitrust, regulation, consumer welfare, intellectual property (pp. 139-181)
Rodger, Barry. / Institutions and mechanisms to facilitate private enforcement across the EU : specialist courts and follow-on actions. Concorrenza e Mercato 2014: Antitrust, regulation, consumer welfare, intellectual property. editor / Marcello Clarich ; Fabiana Di Porto ; Gustavo Ghidini ; Piergaetano Marchetti. 2014. pp. 139-181
@inbook{491af159a82545a9931b3b319ef2f174,
title = "Institutions and mechanisms to facilitate private enforcement across the EU: specialist courts and follow-on actions",
abstract = "This article outlines a key aspect of a recent AHRC funded project concerning the application of competition law in the national courts of the European Union Member States. This was an empirical project with rapporteurs for 27 Member States entrusted with the task of identifying competition case-law judgments in their national courts in the period between 1 May 1999 and 1 May 2012. Each national report also outlined key aspects of the wider legal context within which private enforcement of competition lawoperates in that jurisdiction. The general hypothesis that underlies the dual approach to the project is that private enforcement practice across the legal systems of the EU Member States may at least partly be explained by the existence or availability of particular institutions, mechanisms and cultural factors in relation to the particular legal system. In this article we considered two particular institutions or mechanisms: the specialist court/tribunal and the competition litigation follow-on action mechanism. The picture presented by the data together with the national reports is one of evolving national stories and contexts - which appear to be affected to a greater or lesser extent in different Member States by a combination of national cultures, competition law architecture and civil procedural rules. It is not claimed that there are any direct causal relationships between the insights provided by the empirical data and the national narratives on institutional mechanisms, but the analysis indicates ways and contexts in which competition litigation cultures may develop in the wake of specific institutional mechanisms. The article concludes that it is inevitable that patterns of competition litigation will continue to vary considerably across the EU for the foreseeable future, reflecting, to a great extent, the variable landscape of legal and institutional provision for private enforcement in the EU Member States.",
keywords = "competition law, antitrust law, private inforcement, institutions, specialist courts",
author = "Barry Rodger",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
isbn = "9788814183898",
pages = "139--181",
editor = "Marcello Clarich and {Di Porto}, Fabiana and Gustavo Ghidini and Piergaetano Marchetti",
booktitle = "Concorrenza e Mercato 2014",

}

Rodger, B 2014, Institutions and mechanisms to facilitate private enforcement across the EU: specialist courts and follow-on actions. in M Clarich, F Di Porto, G Ghidini & P Marchetti (eds), Concorrenza e Mercato 2014: Antitrust, regulation, consumer welfare, intellectual property. pp. 139-181.

Institutions and mechanisms to facilitate private enforcement across the EU : specialist courts and follow-on actions. / Rodger, Barry.

Concorrenza e Mercato 2014: Antitrust, regulation, consumer welfare, intellectual property. ed. / Marcello Clarich; Fabiana Di Porto; Gustavo Ghidini; Piergaetano Marchetti. 2014. p. 139-181.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Institutions and mechanisms to facilitate private enforcement across the EU

T2 - specialist courts and follow-on actions

AU - Rodger, Barry

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This article outlines a key aspect of a recent AHRC funded project concerning the application of competition law in the national courts of the European Union Member States. This was an empirical project with rapporteurs for 27 Member States entrusted with the task of identifying competition case-law judgments in their national courts in the period between 1 May 1999 and 1 May 2012. Each national report also outlined key aspects of the wider legal context within which private enforcement of competition lawoperates in that jurisdiction. The general hypothesis that underlies the dual approach to the project is that private enforcement practice across the legal systems of the EU Member States may at least partly be explained by the existence or availability of particular institutions, mechanisms and cultural factors in relation to the particular legal system. In this article we considered two particular institutions or mechanisms: the specialist court/tribunal and the competition litigation follow-on action mechanism. The picture presented by the data together with the national reports is one of evolving national stories and contexts - which appear to be affected to a greater or lesser extent in different Member States by a combination of national cultures, competition law architecture and civil procedural rules. It is not claimed that there are any direct causal relationships between the insights provided by the empirical data and the national narratives on institutional mechanisms, but the analysis indicates ways and contexts in which competition litigation cultures may develop in the wake of specific institutional mechanisms. The article concludes that it is inevitable that patterns of competition litigation will continue to vary considerably across the EU for the foreseeable future, reflecting, to a great extent, the variable landscape of legal and institutional provision for private enforcement in the EU Member States.

AB - This article outlines a key aspect of a recent AHRC funded project concerning the application of competition law in the national courts of the European Union Member States. This was an empirical project with rapporteurs for 27 Member States entrusted with the task of identifying competition case-law judgments in their national courts in the period between 1 May 1999 and 1 May 2012. Each national report also outlined key aspects of the wider legal context within which private enforcement of competition lawoperates in that jurisdiction. The general hypothesis that underlies the dual approach to the project is that private enforcement practice across the legal systems of the EU Member States may at least partly be explained by the existence or availability of particular institutions, mechanisms and cultural factors in relation to the particular legal system. In this article we considered two particular institutions or mechanisms: the specialist court/tribunal and the competition litigation follow-on action mechanism. The picture presented by the data together with the national reports is one of evolving national stories and contexts - which appear to be affected to a greater or lesser extent in different Member States by a combination of national cultures, competition law architecture and civil procedural rules. It is not claimed that there are any direct causal relationships between the insights provided by the empirical data and the national narratives on institutional mechanisms, but the analysis indicates ways and contexts in which competition litigation cultures may develop in the wake of specific institutional mechanisms. The article concludes that it is inevitable that patterns of competition litigation will continue to vary considerably across the EU for the foreseeable future, reflecting, to a great extent, the variable landscape of legal and institutional provision for private enforcement in the EU Member States.

KW - competition law

KW - antitrust law

KW - private inforcement

KW - institutions

KW - specialist courts

UR - http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=it&u=http://www.giuffre.it/it-it/products/224161.html&prev=search

UR - http://www.giuffre.it/it-IT/products/24190391.html

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9788814183898

SP - 139

EP - 181

BT - Concorrenza e Mercato 2014

A2 - Clarich, Marcello

A2 - Di Porto, Fabiana

A2 - Ghidini, Gustavo

A2 - Marchetti, Piergaetano

ER -

Rodger B. Institutions and mechanisms to facilitate private enforcement across the EU: specialist courts and follow-on actions. In Clarich M, Di Porto F, Ghidini G, Marchetti P, editors, Concorrenza e Mercato 2014: Antitrust, regulation, consumer welfare, intellectual property. 2014. p. 139-181