Institutional filters: the translation and re-circulation of ideas about health inequalities within policy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    22 Citations (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Taking health inequalities in the UK as a case study, the paper draws on historical institutionalism and ideational theories to explore how the organisation of policymaking bodies shapes the relationship between research and policy. It demonstrates that policy ‘silos’ and hierarchies operate as filters to research-based ideas, encouraging ideas which support existing policy paradigms and perceived political preferences, whilst blocking or significantly transforming more challenging ideas. This limits the extent to which research can inform policy. Yet, a lack of institutional memory within policymaking enables re-cycled ideas to appear innovative, creating an impression of continual dialogue between research and policy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)81-100
    Number of pages20
    JournalPolicy and Politics
    Volume41
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013

    Fingerprint

    filter
    health
    institutionalism
    body shape
    dialogue
    paradigm
    policy
    lack

    Keywords

    • discursive Institutionalism
    • ideas
    • health inequalities
    • evidence-based policy

    Cite this

    @article{4d5ea95bb796467289ddd28fe7ad9a68,
    title = "Institutional filters: the translation and re-circulation of ideas about health inequalities within policy",
    abstract = "Taking health inequalities in the UK as a case study, the paper draws on historical institutionalism and ideational theories to explore how the organisation of policymaking bodies shapes the relationship between research and policy. It demonstrates that policy ‘silos’ and hierarchies operate as filters to research-based ideas, encouraging ideas which support existing policy paradigms and perceived political preferences, whilst blocking or significantly transforming more challenging ideas. This limits the extent to which research can inform policy. Yet, a lack of institutional memory within policymaking enables re-cycled ideas to appear innovative, creating an impression of continual dialogue between research and policy.",
    keywords = "discursive Institutionalism, ideas, health inequalities, evidence-based policy",
    author = "Smith, {Katherine E}",
    year = "2013",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1332/030557312X655413",
    language = "English",
    volume = "41",
    pages = "81--100",
    journal = "Policy and Politics",
    issn = "0305-5736",
    number = "1",

    }

    Institutional filters : the translation and re-circulation of ideas about health inequalities within policy. / Smith, Katherine E.

    In: Policy and Politics, Vol. 41, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 81-100.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Institutional filters

    T2 - the translation and re-circulation of ideas about health inequalities within policy

    AU - Smith, Katherine E

    PY - 2013/1/1

    Y1 - 2013/1/1

    N2 - Taking health inequalities in the UK as a case study, the paper draws on historical institutionalism and ideational theories to explore how the organisation of policymaking bodies shapes the relationship between research and policy. It demonstrates that policy ‘silos’ and hierarchies operate as filters to research-based ideas, encouraging ideas which support existing policy paradigms and perceived political preferences, whilst blocking or significantly transforming more challenging ideas. This limits the extent to which research can inform policy. Yet, a lack of institutional memory within policymaking enables re-cycled ideas to appear innovative, creating an impression of continual dialogue between research and policy.

    AB - Taking health inequalities in the UK as a case study, the paper draws on historical institutionalism and ideational theories to explore how the organisation of policymaking bodies shapes the relationship between research and policy. It demonstrates that policy ‘silos’ and hierarchies operate as filters to research-based ideas, encouraging ideas which support existing policy paradigms and perceived political preferences, whilst blocking or significantly transforming more challenging ideas. This limits the extent to which research can inform policy. Yet, a lack of institutional memory within policymaking enables re-cycled ideas to appear innovative, creating an impression of continual dialogue between research and policy.

    KW - discursive Institutionalism

    KW - ideas

    KW - health inequalities

    KW - evidence-based policy

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875081565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1332/030557312X655413

    DO - 10.1332/030557312X655413

    M3 - Article

    VL - 41

    SP - 81

    EP - 100

    JO - Policy and Politics

    JF - Policy and Politics

    SN - 0305-5736

    IS - 1

    ER -