Innovating and the dynamics of temporal scaffolding

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Despite the growing acknowledgement of temporal complexities associated with the process perspective on innovation, insights into how timing and temporal experiences shape innovating; remains nascent and under researched. Why might this be the case and how can we gain better insights into the temporal dynamics which unfold while innovating? In this paper, I address this puzzle by tracing the theoretical origins of current limitations in literature to the distinction between the 'substantialist' and 'processual' ontologies in process research. Specifically, I demonstrate two major implications of adopting the 'substantialist' perspective in process research. These are first, the false opposition between persistence and change resulting in theories such as the 'punctuated equilibrium model'; and second, the nature of 'substantialist' and 'processual' time. These insights are then woven into a conceptual framework which informs the process research methodology used to investigate, two new product development projects at a Scottish high value manufacturing firm. Analysis of the data illuminates the unfolding of three distinct yet intertwined processes which I’ve called the process of setting temporal boundaries, the process of temporal prioritizing and the process of temporal sequencing. Taken together, these processes constitute a dynamic process, I call the 'Dynamics of temporal scaffolding'. I conclude by outlining the theoretical and practical implications of the 'dynamics of temporal scaffolding' for innovation research and practice. Such an approach, I believe, would allow us to integrate the temporal experience of organising while innovating with process theories in innovation research.

Conference

Conference31st EGOS Colloquium
Abbreviated titleEGOS 2015
CountryGreece
CityAthens
Period2/07/154/07/15
Internet address

Fingerprint

Innovation
Process research
Persistence
Organizing
Punctuated equilibrium
Ontology
Sequencing
New product development
Process theory
Dynamic process
Manufacturing firms
Conceptual framework
Development projects

Keywords

  • innovation
  • process research
  • temporality

Cite this

Nair, A. K. (2015). Innovating and the dynamics of temporal scaffolding. Paper presented at 31st EGOS Colloquium, Athens, Greece.
Nair, Anup Karath. / Innovating and the dynamics of temporal scaffolding. Paper presented at 31st EGOS Colloquium, Athens, Greece.45 p.
@conference{c958298bb8fc48eb81a084a29412e86c,
title = "Innovating and the dynamics of temporal scaffolding",
abstract = "Despite the growing acknowledgement of temporal complexities associated with the process perspective on innovation, insights into how timing and temporal experiences shape innovating; remains nascent and under researched. Why might this be the case and how can we gain better insights into the temporal dynamics which unfold while innovating? In this paper, I address this puzzle by tracing the theoretical origins of current limitations in literature to the distinction between the 'substantialist' and 'processual' ontologies in process research. Specifically, I demonstrate two major implications of adopting the 'substantialist' perspective in process research. These are first, the false opposition between persistence and change resulting in theories such as the 'punctuated equilibrium model'; and second, the nature of 'substantialist' and 'processual' time. These insights are then woven into a conceptual framework which informs the process research methodology used to investigate, two new product development projects at a Scottish high value manufacturing firm. Analysis of the data illuminates the unfolding of three distinct yet intertwined processes which I’ve called the process of setting temporal boundaries, the process of temporal prioritizing and the process of temporal sequencing. Taken together, these processes constitute a dynamic process, I call the 'Dynamics of temporal scaffolding'. I conclude by outlining the theoretical and practical implications of the 'dynamics of temporal scaffolding' for innovation research and practice. Such an approach, I believe, would allow us to integrate the temporal experience of organising while innovating with process theories in innovation research.",
keywords = "innovation, process research, temporality",
author = "Nair, {Anup Karath}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "4",
language = "English",
note = "31st EGOS Colloquium, EGOS 2015 ; Conference date: 02-07-2015 Through 04-07-2015",
url = "http://www.egosnet.org/2015_athens/",

}

Nair, AK 2015, 'Innovating and the dynamics of temporal scaffolding' Paper presented at 31st EGOS Colloquium, Athens, Greece, 2/07/15 - 4/07/15, .

Innovating and the dynamics of temporal scaffolding. / Nair, Anup Karath.

2015. Paper presented at 31st EGOS Colloquium, Athens, Greece.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Innovating and the dynamics of temporal scaffolding

AU - Nair, Anup Karath

PY - 2015/7/4

Y1 - 2015/7/4

N2 - Despite the growing acknowledgement of temporal complexities associated with the process perspective on innovation, insights into how timing and temporal experiences shape innovating; remains nascent and under researched. Why might this be the case and how can we gain better insights into the temporal dynamics which unfold while innovating? In this paper, I address this puzzle by tracing the theoretical origins of current limitations in literature to the distinction between the 'substantialist' and 'processual' ontologies in process research. Specifically, I demonstrate two major implications of adopting the 'substantialist' perspective in process research. These are first, the false opposition between persistence and change resulting in theories such as the 'punctuated equilibrium model'; and second, the nature of 'substantialist' and 'processual' time. These insights are then woven into a conceptual framework which informs the process research methodology used to investigate, two new product development projects at a Scottish high value manufacturing firm. Analysis of the data illuminates the unfolding of three distinct yet intertwined processes which I’ve called the process of setting temporal boundaries, the process of temporal prioritizing and the process of temporal sequencing. Taken together, these processes constitute a dynamic process, I call the 'Dynamics of temporal scaffolding'. I conclude by outlining the theoretical and practical implications of the 'dynamics of temporal scaffolding' for innovation research and practice. Such an approach, I believe, would allow us to integrate the temporal experience of organising while innovating with process theories in innovation research.

AB - Despite the growing acknowledgement of temporal complexities associated with the process perspective on innovation, insights into how timing and temporal experiences shape innovating; remains nascent and under researched. Why might this be the case and how can we gain better insights into the temporal dynamics which unfold while innovating? In this paper, I address this puzzle by tracing the theoretical origins of current limitations in literature to the distinction between the 'substantialist' and 'processual' ontologies in process research. Specifically, I demonstrate two major implications of adopting the 'substantialist' perspective in process research. These are first, the false opposition between persistence and change resulting in theories such as the 'punctuated equilibrium model'; and second, the nature of 'substantialist' and 'processual' time. These insights are then woven into a conceptual framework which informs the process research methodology used to investigate, two new product development projects at a Scottish high value manufacturing firm. Analysis of the data illuminates the unfolding of three distinct yet intertwined processes which I’ve called the process of setting temporal boundaries, the process of temporal prioritizing and the process of temporal sequencing. Taken together, these processes constitute a dynamic process, I call the 'Dynamics of temporal scaffolding'. I conclude by outlining the theoretical and practical implications of the 'dynamics of temporal scaffolding' for innovation research and practice. Such an approach, I believe, would allow us to integrate the temporal experience of organising while innovating with process theories in innovation research.

KW - innovation

KW - process research

KW - temporality

UR - http://www.egosnet.org/2015_athens/general_theme

M3 - Paper

ER -

Nair AK. Innovating and the dynamics of temporal scaffolding. 2015. Paper presented at 31st EGOS Colloquium, Athens, Greece.