Injection of clarity needed?

K. Stalker, J. Carpenter, R. Phillips, C. Connors

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The legal status of children who stay in hospital for three months or longer gives rise to considerable confusion among managers in social services and social work departments. And the number of young people affected is significant. NHS statistics for the year ending 31 March 2000 suggest that in England around 2,800 children aged 0-19 on admission were discharged after spending more than two months in hospital, as were more than 500 children in Scotland. (A small number of these would have been discharged as adults.) A two-year study, commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation1 and carried out by the universities of Stirling, Durham, Newcastle and York, investigated the numbers, characteristics and circumstances of children and young people with complex needs who spend long periods in health care settings. Interviews were conducted in England and Scotland with 11 social services or health managers responsible for these children. The findings show a worrying degree of uncertainty about the position of young people who find themselves in a hospital or other health care setting for at least three months. One social services manager believed such children become looked after under the terms of the Children Act 1989. Another said children are not formally looked after but nevertheless receive the same services and safeguards as those who are. One Scottish social work manager did not know whether children going into health care settings for short-term (respite) care are looked after or not. And discussion with the research team's advisory group indicated that the confusion is not confined to our fieldwork areas.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages32-33
    Number of pages1
    JournalCommunity Care Law Reports
    Volume8
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2003

    Fingerprint

    manager
    mobile social services
    health care
    social work
    legal status
    statistics
    act
    uncertainty
    university
    interview
    health
    Group

    Keywords

    • social services
    • social work
    • child care
    • community care
    • health care
    • special needs education

    Cite this

    Stalker, K., Carpenter, J., Phillips, R., & Connors, C. (2003). Injection of clarity needed? Community Care Law Reports, 8, 32-33.
    Stalker, K. ; Carpenter, J. ; Phillips, R. ; Connors, C. / Injection of clarity needed?. In: Community Care Law Reports. 2003 ; Vol. 8. pp. 32-33.
    @article{e732f4e8d84644ddb66ef356832b663b,
    title = "Injection of clarity needed?",
    abstract = "The legal status of children who stay in hospital for three months or longer gives rise to considerable confusion among managers in social services and social work departments. And the number of young people affected is significant. NHS statistics for the year ending 31 March 2000 suggest that in England around 2,800 children aged 0-19 on admission were discharged after spending more than two months in hospital, as were more than 500 children in Scotland. (A small number of these would have been discharged as adults.) A two-year study, commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation1 and carried out by the universities of Stirling, Durham, Newcastle and York, investigated the numbers, characteristics and circumstances of children and young people with complex needs who spend long periods in health care settings. Interviews were conducted in England and Scotland with 11 social services or health managers responsible for these children. The findings show a worrying degree of uncertainty about the position of young people who find themselves in a hospital or other health care setting for at least three months. One social services manager believed such children become looked after under the terms of the Children Act 1989. Another said children are not formally looked after but nevertheless receive the same services and safeguards as those who are. One Scottish social work manager did not know whether children going into health care settings for short-term (respite) care are looked after or not. And discussion with the research team's advisory group indicated that the confusion is not confined to our fieldwork areas.",
    keywords = "social services, social work, child care, community care, health care, special needs education",
    author = "K. Stalker and J. Carpenter and R. Phillips and C. Connors",
    year = "2003",
    month = "8",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "32--33",
    journal = "Community Care Law Reports",
    issn = "1460-9169",

    }

    Stalker, K, Carpenter, J, Phillips, R & Connors, C 2003, 'Injection of clarity needed?' Community Care Law Reports, vol. 8, pp. 32-33.

    Injection of clarity needed? / Stalker, K.; Carpenter, J.; Phillips, R.; Connors, C.

    In: Community Care Law Reports, Vol. 8, 08.2003, p. 32-33.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Injection of clarity needed?

    AU - Stalker, K.

    AU - Carpenter, J.

    AU - Phillips, R.

    AU - Connors, C.

    PY - 2003/8

    Y1 - 2003/8

    N2 - The legal status of children who stay in hospital for three months or longer gives rise to considerable confusion among managers in social services and social work departments. And the number of young people affected is significant. NHS statistics for the year ending 31 March 2000 suggest that in England around 2,800 children aged 0-19 on admission were discharged after spending more than two months in hospital, as were more than 500 children in Scotland. (A small number of these would have been discharged as adults.) A two-year study, commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation1 and carried out by the universities of Stirling, Durham, Newcastle and York, investigated the numbers, characteristics and circumstances of children and young people with complex needs who spend long periods in health care settings. Interviews were conducted in England and Scotland with 11 social services or health managers responsible for these children. The findings show a worrying degree of uncertainty about the position of young people who find themselves in a hospital or other health care setting for at least three months. One social services manager believed such children become looked after under the terms of the Children Act 1989. Another said children are not formally looked after but nevertheless receive the same services and safeguards as those who are. One Scottish social work manager did not know whether children going into health care settings for short-term (respite) care are looked after or not. And discussion with the research team's advisory group indicated that the confusion is not confined to our fieldwork areas.

    AB - The legal status of children who stay in hospital for three months or longer gives rise to considerable confusion among managers in social services and social work departments. And the number of young people affected is significant. NHS statistics for the year ending 31 March 2000 suggest that in England around 2,800 children aged 0-19 on admission were discharged after spending more than two months in hospital, as were more than 500 children in Scotland. (A small number of these would have been discharged as adults.) A two-year study, commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation1 and carried out by the universities of Stirling, Durham, Newcastle and York, investigated the numbers, characteristics and circumstances of children and young people with complex needs who spend long periods in health care settings. Interviews were conducted in England and Scotland with 11 social services or health managers responsible for these children. The findings show a worrying degree of uncertainty about the position of young people who find themselves in a hospital or other health care setting for at least three months. One social services manager believed such children become looked after under the terms of the Children Act 1989. Another said children are not formally looked after but nevertheless receive the same services and safeguards as those who are. One Scottish social work manager did not know whether children going into health care settings for short-term (respite) care are looked after or not. And discussion with the research team's advisory group indicated that the confusion is not confined to our fieldwork areas.

    KW - social services

    KW - social work

    KW - child care

    KW - community care

    KW - health care

    KW - special needs education

    UR - http://www.lag.org.uk/cclr.aspx

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    SP - 32

    EP - 33

    JO - Community Care Law Reports

    T2 - Community Care Law Reports

    JF - Community Care Law Reports

    SN - 1460-9169

    ER -

    Stalker K, Carpenter J, Phillips R, Connors C. Injection of clarity needed? Community Care Law Reports. 2003 Aug;8:32-33.