Information retrieval in the workplace: a comparison of professional search practices

Tony Russell-Rose, Jon Chamberlain, Leif Azzopardi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Legal researchers, recruitment professionals, healthcare information professionals, and patent analysts all undertake work tasks where search forms a core part of their duties. In these instances, the search task is often complex and time-consuming and requires specialist expertise to identify relevant documents and insights within large domain-specific repositories and collections. Several studies have been made investigating the search practices of professionals such as these, but few have attempted to directly compare their professional practices and so it remains unclear to what extent insights and approaches from one domain can be applied to another. In this paper we describe the results of a survey of a purposive sample of 108 legal researchers, 64 recruitment professionals and 107 healthcare information professionals. Their responses are compared with results from a previous survey of 81 patent analysts. The survey investigated their search practices and preferences, the types of functionality they value, and their requirements for future information retrieval systems. The results reveal that these professions share many fundamental needs and face similar challenges. In particular a continuing preference to formulate queries as Boolean expressions, the need to manage, organise and re-use search strategies and results and an ambivalence toward the use of relevance ranking. The results stress the importance of recall and coverage for the healthcare and patent professionals, while precision and recency were more important to the legal and recruitment professionals. The results also highlight the need to ensure that search systems give confidence to the professional searcher and so trust, explainability and accountability remains a significant challenge when developing such systems. The findings suggest that translational research between the different areas could benefit professionals across domains.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1042-1057
Number of pages16
JournalInformation Processing and Management
Volume54
Issue number6
Early online date27 Jul 2018
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 27 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Information retrieval
information retrieval
patent
workplace
Information retrieval systems
ambivalence
functionality
ranking
expertise
confidence
coverage
profession
responsibility
Work place
Values
Patents
Healthcare

Keywords

  • search practices
  • search tasks
  • information professionals
  • query formulation
  • information systems
  • Boolean
  • information retrieval

Cite this

@article{1f2493381638421aa1ea8377ce49ab75,
title = "Information retrieval in the workplace: a comparison of professional search practices",
abstract = "Legal researchers, recruitment professionals, healthcare information professionals, and patent analysts all undertake work tasks where search forms a core part of their duties. In these instances, the search task is often complex and time-consuming and requires specialist expertise to identify relevant documents and insights within large domain-specific repositories and collections. Several studies have been made investigating the search practices of professionals such as these, but few have attempted to directly compare their professional practices and so it remains unclear to what extent insights and approaches from one domain can be applied to another. In this paper we describe the results of a survey of a purposive sample of 108 legal researchers, 64 recruitment professionals and 107 healthcare information professionals. Their responses are compared with results from a previous survey of 81 patent analysts. The survey investigated their search practices and preferences, the types of functionality they value, and their requirements for future information retrieval systems. The results reveal that these professions share many fundamental needs and face similar challenges. In particular a continuing preference to formulate queries as Boolean expressions, the need to manage, organise and re-use search strategies and results and an ambivalence toward the use of relevance ranking. The results stress the importance of recall and coverage for the healthcare and patent professionals, while precision and recency were more important to the legal and recruitment professionals. The results also highlight the need to ensure that search systems give confidence to the professional searcher and so trust, explainability and accountability remains a significant challenge when developing such systems. The findings suggest that translational research between the different areas could benefit professionals across domains.",
keywords = "search practices, search tasks, information professionals, query formulation, information systems, Boolean, information retrieval",
author = "Tony Russell-Rose and Jon Chamberlain and Leif Azzopardi",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1016/j.ipm.2018.07.003",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "1042--1057",
journal = "Information Processing and Management",
issn = "0306-4573",
number = "6",

}

Information retrieval in the workplace : a comparison of professional search practices. / Russell-Rose, Tony; Chamberlain, Jon; Azzopardi, Leif.

In: Information Processing and Management, Vol. 54, No. 6, 01.11.2018, p. 1042-1057.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Information retrieval in the workplace

T2 - Information Processing and Management

AU - Russell-Rose,Tony

AU - Chamberlain,Jon

AU - Azzopardi,Leif

PY - 2018/7/27

Y1 - 2018/7/27

N2 - Legal researchers, recruitment professionals, healthcare information professionals, and patent analysts all undertake work tasks where search forms a core part of their duties. In these instances, the search task is often complex and time-consuming and requires specialist expertise to identify relevant documents and insights within large domain-specific repositories and collections. Several studies have been made investigating the search practices of professionals such as these, but few have attempted to directly compare their professional practices and so it remains unclear to what extent insights and approaches from one domain can be applied to another. In this paper we describe the results of a survey of a purposive sample of 108 legal researchers, 64 recruitment professionals and 107 healthcare information professionals. Their responses are compared with results from a previous survey of 81 patent analysts. The survey investigated their search practices and preferences, the types of functionality they value, and their requirements for future information retrieval systems. The results reveal that these professions share many fundamental needs and face similar challenges. In particular a continuing preference to formulate queries as Boolean expressions, the need to manage, organise and re-use search strategies and results and an ambivalence toward the use of relevance ranking. The results stress the importance of recall and coverage for the healthcare and patent professionals, while precision and recency were more important to the legal and recruitment professionals. The results also highlight the need to ensure that search systems give confidence to the professional searcher and so trust, explainability and accountability remains a significant challenge when developing such systems. The findings suggest that translational research between the different areas could benefit professionals across domains.

AB - Legal researchers, recruitment professionals, healthcare information professionals, and patent analysts all undertake work tasks where search forms a core part of their duties. In these instances, the search task is often complex and time-consuming and requires specialist expertise to identify relevant documents and insights within large domain-specific repositories and collections. Several studies have been made investigating the search practices of professionals such as these, but few have attempted to directly compare their professional practices and so it remains unclear to what extent insights and approaches from one domain can be applied to another. In this paper we describe the results of a survey of a purposive sample of 108 legal researchers, 64 recruitment professionals and 107 healthcare information professionals. Their responses are compared with results from a previous survey of 81 patent analysts. The survey investigated their search practices and preferences, the types of functionality they value, and their requirements for future information retrieval systems. The results reveal that these professions share many fundamental needs and face similar challenges. In particular a continuing preference to formulate queries as Boolean expressions, the need to manage, organise and re-use search strategies and results and an ambivalence toward the use of relevance ranking. The results stress the importance of recall and coverage for the healthcare and patent professionals, while precision and recency were more important to the legal and recruitment professionals. The results also highlight the need to ensure that search systems give confidence to the professional searcher and so trust, explainability and accountability remains a significant challenge when developing such systems. The findings suggest that translational research between the different areas could benefit professionals across domains.

KW - search practices

KW - search tasks

KW - information professionals

KW - query formulation

KW - information systems

KW - Boolean

KW - information retrieval

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/information-processing-and-management

U2 - 10.1016/j.ipm.2018.07.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ipm.2018.07.003

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 1042

EP - 1057

JO - Information Processing and Management

JF - Information Processing and Management

SN - 0306-4573

IS - 6

ER -