Influences of design tools on the original and redesign processes

Gokula Vijayumar Annamalai Vasantha, Amaresh Chakrabarti, Bijay Kumar Rout, Jonathan Corney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Concept generation plays a vital role in establishing a broader foundation in the design process to create novel products. In the globalized, collaborative, designing scenario, an unambiguous representation of captured ideas to explicate a designer’s thoughts is important in the sharing and reuse of concepts. Various design studies have noted the impact of design tools on concept generation. However, the results did not detail the influences of a variety of tools on the representation and reinterpretation of concepts through captured design documents. The goal of this paper was to understand the influence of conceptual design tools: Hi-Tech Mobile e-Notes Taker, Wacom Tablet, and Rhinoceros CAD with MS Word/PowerPoint on concept representation and reinterpretation, during the original and redesign phases. Eighteen design experiments, involving six individual student designers’ solving three design problems each, were conducted in the original and redesign phases. The analyses of 26 variables from captured documents and video protocols reveal that the design tools had a statistically significant impact on four key variables: the total time taken to solve each problem, the time spent on detailed design activity, the textual representation of structural requirements, and the graphical representation of the structure of detailed concepts. Irrespective of the design tool used, novice designers generated a low number of redesign concepts. This makes us conclude that designers might require training for reinterpretation and extracting necessary information from the concepts originally captured, rather than working with poor understanding, ambiguity, and assumptions about the original designer’s intent.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-50
Number of pages31
JournalInternational Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation
Volume2
Issue number1
Early online date27 Sep 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Tablets
Students
Conceptual design
Computer aided design
Working Poor
Experiments

Keywords

  • concept generation
  • reinterpretation
  • design tools
  • representation

Cite this

Annamalai Vasantha, Gokula Vijayumar ; Chakrabarti, Amaresh ; Rout, Bijay Kumar ; Corney, Jonathan. / Influences of design tools on the original and redesign processes. In: International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation. 2013 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 20-50.
@article{1c27a75c7d974b5d8a469fe53972fbc5,
title = "Influences of design tools on the original and redesign processes",
abstract = "Concept generation plays a vital role in establishing a broader foundation in the design process to create novel products. In the globalized, collaborative, designing scenario, an unambiguous representation of captured ideas to explicate a designer’s thoughts is important in the sharing and reuse of concepts. Various design studies have noted the impact of design tools on concept generation. However, the results did not detail the influences of a variety of tools on the representation and reinterpretation of concepts through captured design documents. The goal of this paper was to understand the influence of conceptual design tools: Hi-Tech Mobile e-Notes Taker, Wacom Tablet, and Rhinoceros CAD with MS Word/PowerPoint on concept representation and reinterpretation, during the original and redesign phases. Eighteen design experiments, involving six individual student designers’ solving three design problems each, were conducted in the original and redesign phases. The analyses of 26 variables from captured documents and video protocols reveal that the design tools had a statistically significant impact on four key variables: the total time taken to solve each problem, the time spent on detailed design activity, the textual representation of structural requirements, and the graphical representation of the structure of detailed concepts. Irrespective of the design tool used, novice designers generated a low number of redesign concepts. This makes us conclude that designers might require training for reinterpretation and extracting necessary information from the concepts originally captured, rather than working with poor understanding, ambiguity, and assumptions about the original designer’s intent.",
keywords = "concept generation , reinterpretation, design tools, representation",
author = "{Annamalai Vasantha}, {Gokula Vijayumar} and Amaresh Chakrabarti and Rout, {Bijay Kumar} and Jonathan Corney",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/21650349.2013.839076",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "20--50",
journal = "International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation",
issn = "2165-0349",
number = "1",

}

Influences of design tools on the original and redesign processes. / Annamalai Vasantha, Gokula Vijayumar; Chakrabarti, Amaresh; Rout, Bijay Kumar; Corney, Jonathan.

In: International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2013, p. 20-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influences of design tools on the original and redesign processes

AU - Annamalai Vasantha, Gokula Vijayumar

AU - Chakrabarti, Amaresh

AU - Rout, Bijay Kumar

AU - Corney, Jonathan

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Concept generation plays a vital role in establishing a broader foundation in the design process to create novel products. In the globalized, collaborative, designing scenario, an unambiguous representation of captured ideas to explicate a designer’s thoughts is important in the sharing and reuse of concepts. Various design studies have noted the impact of design tools on concept generation. However, the results did not detail the influences of a variety of tools on the representation and reinterpretation of concepts through captured design documents. The goal of this paper was to understand the influence of conceptual design tools: Hi-Tech Mobile e-Notes Taker, Wacom Tablet, and Rhinoceros CAD with MS Word/PowerPoint on concept representation and reinterpretation, during the original and redesign phases. Eighteen design experiments, involving six individual student designers’ solving three design problems each, were conducted in the original and redesign phases. The analyses of 26 variables from captured documents and video protocols reveal that the design tools had a statistically significant impact on four key variables: the total time taken to solve each problem, the time spent on detailed design activity, the textual representation of structural requirements, and the graphical representation of the structure of detailed concepts. Irrespective of the design tool used, novice designers generated a low number of redesign concepts. This makes us conclude that designers might require training for reinterpretation and extracting necessary information from the concepts originally captured, rather than working with poor understanding, ambiguity, and assumptions about the original designer’s intent.

AB - Concept generation plays a vital role in establishing a broader foundation in the design process to create novel products. In the globalized, collaborative, designing scenario, an unambiguous representation of captured ideas to explicate a designer’s thoughts is important in the sharing and reuse of concepts. Various design studies have noted the impact of design tools on concept generation. However, the results did not detail the influences of a variety of tools on the representation and reinterpretation of concepts through captured design documents. The goal of this paper was to understand the influence of conceptual design tools: Hi-Tech Mobile e-Notes Taker, Wacom Tablet, and Rhinoceros CAD with MS Word/PowerPoint on concept representation and reinterpretation, during the original and redesign phases. Eighteen design experiments, involving six individual student designers’ solving three design problems each, were conducted in the original and redesign phases. The analyses of 26 variables from captured documents and video protocols reveal that the design tools had a statistically significant impact on four key variables: the total time taken to solve each problem, the time spent on detailed design activity, the textual representation of structural requirements, and the graphical representation of the structure of detailed concepts. Irrespective of the design tool used, novice designers generated a low number of redesign concepts. This makes us conclude that designers might require training for reinterpretation and extracting necessary information from the concepts originally captured, rather than working with poor understanding, ambiguity, and assumptions about the original designer’s intent.

KW - concept generation

KW - reinterpretation

KW - design tools

KW - representation

U2 - 10.1080/21650349.2013.839076

DO - 10.1080/21650349.2013.839076

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 20

EP - 50

JO - International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation

JF - International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation

SN - 2165-0349

IS - 1

ER -