Influence of the Emissions Trading Scheme on generation scheduling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper investigates the effects of emissions constraints and Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) on the generation scheduling outcome. ETS is a cap-and-trade market mechanism that has been introduced in European Union in order to facilitate CO2 emissions management. This scheme gives generators certain amount of CO2 allowances which they can use to cover emissions produced during energy generation. In a current setting, most of the allowances are given for free. However, under ETS generators also have an opportunity to buy and sell CO2 allowances on the market. Since generation power outputs are bounded by the amount of CO2 emissions that they are allowed to produce over time, it is becoming increasingly important for generating units to manage their allocations in the most profitable way and decide when and how much of permissions to spent to produce electricity. The method proposed here allows for modeling of this new limitation by including costs of buying and selling of CO2 allowance in the generation scheduling procedure. It also introduces additional emissions constraints in the problem formulation. Although CO2 permissions and energy are traded in separate markets, the proposed formulation permits analysis on how emission caps and emission market prices can influence market outcome. The method is illustrated on a 5-unit system. Given examples compare (i) a base-case when all generators have made a decision to use portions of their total free allocations that do not cause any shortfall during the investigated time period; (ii) two cases when the least expensive generators' decisions on the amount of free allowances they are willing to use during the considered period are insufficient. In all cases generators also submit prices at which they expect to be able to 'top-up' or sell allowances on the market, however, only in the second and third case the 'buying' option becomes active and affects generation scheduling and total costs. In addition, the paper investigates how aggregation of emissions allowances of generators belonging to the same company can affect market clearing.
LanguageEnglish
Pages465-473
Number of pages9
JournalElectrical Power and Energy Systems
Volume31
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Scheduling
Power generation
Costs
Sales
Agglomeration
Electricity
Industry
European Union

Keywords

  • Emissions Trading Scheme
  • unit commitment
  • generation scheduling
  • market clearing
  • mixed integer programming
  • emission allowances

Cite this

@article{5c0c55d51554461eb5be3de992921d27,
title = "Influence of the Emissions Trading Scheme on generation scheduling",
abstract = "The paper investigates the effects of emissions constraints and Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) on the generation scheduling outcome. ETS is a cap-and-trade market mechanism that has been introduced in European Union in order to facilitate CO2 emissions management. This scheme gives generators certain amount of CO2 allowances which they can use to cover emissions produced during energy generation. In a current setting, most of the allowances are given for free. However, under ETS generators also have an opportunity to buy and sell CO2 allowances on the market. Since generation power outputs are bounded by the amount of CO2 emissions that they are allowed to produce over time, it is becoming increasingly important for generating units to manage their allocations in the most profitable way and decide when and how much of permissions to spent to produce electricity. The method proposed here allows for modeling of this new limitation by including costs of buying and selling of CO2 allowance in the generation scheduling procedure. It also introduces additional emissions constraints in the problem formulation. Although CO2 permissions and energy are traded in separate markets, the proposed formulation permits analysis on how emission caps and emission market prices can influence market outcome. The method is illustrated on a 5-unit system. Given examples compare (i) a base-case when all generators have made a decision to use portions of their total free allocations that do not cause any shortfall during the investigated time period; (ii) two cases when the least expensive generators' decisions on the amount of free allowances they are willing to use during the considered period are insufficient. In all cases generators also submit prices at which they expect to be able to 'top-up' or sell allowances on the market, however, only in the second and third case the 'buying' option becomes active and affects generation scheduling and total costs. In addition, the paper investigates how aggregation of emissions allowances of generators belonging to the same company can affect market clearing.",
keywords = "Emissions Trading Scheme, unit commitment, generation scheduling, market clearing, mixed integer programming, emission allowances",
author = "I. Kockar and A. Conejo and J.R. McDonald",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.07.001",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "465--473",
journal = "Electrical Power and Energy Systems",
issn = "0142-0615",
number = "9",

}

Influence of the Emissions Trading Scheme on generation scheduling. / Kockar, I.; Conejo, A.; McDonald, J.R.

In: Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 31, No. 9, 10.2009, p. 465-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of the Emissions Trading Scheme on generation scheduling

AU - Kockar, I.

AU - Conejo, A.

AU - McDonald, J.R.

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - The paper investigates the effects of emissions constraints and Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) on the generation scheduling outcome. ETS is a cap-and-trade market mechanism that has been introduced in European Union in order to facilitate CO2 emissions management. This scheme gives generators certain amount of CO2 allowances which they can use to cover emissions produced during energy generation. In a current setting, most of the allowances are given for free. However, under ETS generators also have an opportunity to buy and sell CO2 allowances on the market. Since generation power outputs are bounded by the amount of CO2 emissions that they are allowed to produce over time, it is becoming increasingly important for generating units to manage their allocations in the most profitable way and decide when and how much of permissions to spent to produce electricity. The method proposed here allows for modeling of this new limitation by including costs of buying and selling of CO2 allowance in the generation scheduling procedure. It also introduces additional emissions constraints in the problem formulation. Although CO2 permissions and energy are traded in separate markets, the proposed formulation permits analysis on how emission caps and emission market prices can influence market outcome. The method is illustrated on a 5-unit system. Given examples compare (i) a base-case when all generators have made a decision to use portions of their total free allocations that do not cause any shortfall during the investigated time period; (ii) two cases when the least expensive generators' decisions on the amount of free allowances they are willing to use during the considered period are insufficient. In all cases generators also submit prices at which they expect to be able to 'top-up' or sell allowances on the market, however, only in the second and third case the 'buying' option becomes active and affects generation scheduling and total costs. In addition, the paper investigates how aggregation of emissions allowances of generators belonging to the same company can affect market clearing.

AB - The paper investigates the effects of emissions constraints and Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) on the generation scheduling outcome. ETS is a cap-and-trade market mechanism that has been introduced in European Union in order to facilitate CO2 emissions management. This scheme gives generators certain amount of CO2 allowances which they can use to cover emissions produced during energy generation. In a current setting, most of the allowances are given for free. However, under ETS generators also have an opportunity to buy and sell CO2 allowances on the market. Since generation power outputs are bounded by the amount of CO2 emissions that they are allowed to produce over time, it is becoming increasingly important for generating units to manage their allocations in the most profitable way and decide when and how much of permissions to spent to produce electricity. The method proposed here allows for modeling of this new limitation by including costs of buying and selling of CO2 allowance in the generation scheduling procedure. It also introduces additional emissions constraints in the problem formulation. Although CO2 permissions and energy are traded in separate markets, the proposed formulation permits analysis on how emission caps and emission market prices can influence market outcome. The method is illustrated on a 5-unit system. Given examples compare (i) a base-case when all generators have made a decision to use portions of their total free allocations that do not cause any shortfall during the investigated time period; (ii) two cases when the least expensive generators' decisions on the amount of free allowances they are willing to use during the considered period are insufficient. In all cases generators also submit prices at which they expect to be able to 'top-up' or sell allowances on the market, however, only in the second and third case the 'buying' option becomes active and affects generation scheduling and total costs. In addition, the paper investigates how aggregation of emissions allowances of generators belonging to the same company can affect market clearing.

KW - Emissions Trading Scheme

KW - unit commitment

KW - generation scheduling

KW - market clearing

KW - mixed integer programming

KW - emission allowances

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.07.001

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 465

EP - 473

JO - Electrical Power and Energy Systems

T2 - Electrical Power and Energy Systems

JF - Electrical Power and Energy Systems

SN - 0142-0615

IS - 9

ER -