Individual resources, property rights and entrepreneurship in China

Sreevas Sahasranamam, G. Venkat Raman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – In the last decade, the Chinese government enacted two rule-based policy changes related to property rights; namely, a constitutional amendment to protect the lawful rights of the private sector in 2004 and a property rights law in 2007. Using property rights theory, this study hypothesizes the contingent effect that these property rights changes have on the investment of individual human and financial capital towards entrepreneurship. In addition, this study also explores whether property rights changes have a differential effect on the two forms of entrepreneurship, namely, opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship.
Design/methodology/approach – This research uses logit regression analysis on a two period model using the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) database to test these effects.
Findings – Contrary to existing evidence from Western contexts, this study finds that property rights changes have a significant influence on the investment of both forms of capital towards necessity entrepreneurship in China.
Research limitations – The use of a secondary database like GEM has certain limitations, such as the non-availability of data on a longitudinal basis, and the need to operationalize certain constructs like human and financial capital as non-continuous variables.
Originality/value – There has been limited research on the phenomena of necessity entrepreneurship in economies such as that of China. The findings of this study highlight that property rights protection is equally important for necessity entrepreneurship in institutional contexts like China
LanguageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Emerging Markets
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 20 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

China
Resources
Property rights
Entrepreneurship
Data base
Financial capital
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor
Human capital
Policy change
Design methodology
Rule-based
Regression analysis
Institutional context
Private sector
Government
Property rights theory
Logit regression
Amendments

Keywords

  • entrepreneurship
  • property rights
  • China
  • emerging markets
  • global entrepreneurship monitor

Cite this

@article{70dd390172d8449cad0edea792836069,
title = "Individual resources, property rights and entrepreneurship in China",
abstract = "Purpose – In the last decade, the Chinese government enacted two rule-based policy changes related to property rights; namely, a constitutional amendment to protect the lawful rights of the private sector in 2004 and a property rights law in 2007. Using property rights theory, this study hypothesizes the contingent effect that these property rights changes have on the investment of individual human and financial capital towards entrepreneurship. In addition, this study also explores whether property rights changes have a differential effect on the two forms of entrepreneurship, namely, opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship. Design/methodology/approach – This research uses logit regression analysis on a two period model using the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) database to test these effects. Findings – Contrary to existing evidence from Western contexts, this study finds that property rights changes have a significant influence on the investment of both forms of capital towards necessity entrepreneurship in China. Research limitations – The use of a secondary database like GEM has certain limitations, such as the non-availability of data on a longitudinal basis, and the need to operationalize certain constructs like human and financial capital as non-continuous variables. Originality/value – There has been limited research on the phenomena of necessity entrepreneurship in economies such as that of China. The findings of this study highlight that property rights protection is equally important for necessity entrepreneurship in institutional contexts like China",
keywords = "entrepreneurship, property rights, China, emerging markets, global entrepreneurship monitor",
author = "Sreevas Sahasranamam and Raman, {G. Venkat}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1108/IJoEM-02-2018-0097",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Emerging Markets",
issn = "1746-8809",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",

}

Individual resources, property rights and entrepreneurship in China. / Sahasranamam, Sreevas; Raman, G. Venkat.

In: International Journal of Emerging Markets, 20.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual resources, property rights and entrepreneurship in China

AU - Sahasranamam, Sreevas

AU - Raman, G. Venkat

PY - 2018/6/20

Y1 - 2018/6/20

N2 - Purpose – In the last decade, the Chinese government enacted two rule-based policy changes related to property rights; namely, a constitutional amendment to protect the lawful rights of the private sector in 2004 and a property rights law in 2007. Using property rights theory, this study hypothesizes the contingent effect that these property rights changes have on the investment of individual human and financial capital towards entrepreneurship. In addition, this study also explores whether property rights changes have a differential effect on the two forms of entrepreneurship, namely, opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship. Design/methodology/approach – This research uses logit regression analysis on a two period model using the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) database to test these effects. Findings – Contrary to existing evidence from Western contexts, this study finds that property rights changes have a significant influence on the investment of both forms of capital towards necessity entrepreneurship in China. Research limitations – The use of a secondary database like GEM has certain limitations, such as the non-availability of data on a longitudinal basis, and the need to operationalize certain constructs like human and financial capital as non-continuous variables. Originality/value – There has been limited research on the phenomena of necessity entrepreneurship in economies such as that of China. The findings of this study highlight that property rights protection is equally important for necessity entrepreneurship in institutional contexts like China

AB - Purpose – In the last decade, the Chinese government enacted two rule-based policy changes related to property rights; namely, a constitutional amendment to protect the lawful rights of the private sector in 2004 and a property rights law in 2007. Using property rights theory, this study hypothesizes the contingent effect that these property rights changes have on the investment of individual human and financial capital towards entrepreneurship. In addition, this study also explores whether property rights changes have a differential effect on the two forms of entrepreneurship, namely, opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship. Design/methodology/approach – This research uses logit regression analysis on a two period model using the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) database to test these effects. Findings – Contrary to existing evidence from Western contexts, this study finds that property rights changes have a significant influence on the investment of both forms of capital towards necessity entrepreneurship in China. Research limitations – The use of a secondary database like GEM has certain limitations, such as the non-availability of data on a longitudinal basis, and the need to operationalize certain constructs like human and financial capital as non-continuous variables. Originality/value – There has been limited research on the phenomena of necessity entrepreneurship in economies such as that of China. The findings of this study highlight that property rights protection is equally important for necessity entrepreneurship in institutional contexts like China

KW - entrepreneurship

KW - property rights

KW - China

KW - emerging markets

KW - global entrepreneurship monitor

UR - http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=ijoem

U2 - 10.1108/IJoEM-02-2018-0097

DO - 10.1108/IJoEM-02-2018-0097

M3 - Article

JO - International Journal of Emerging Markets

T2 - International Journal of Emerging Markets

JF - International Journal of Emerging Markets

SN - 1746-8809

ER -