Individual differences in face identity processing

Jennifer M. McCaffery, David J. Robertson, Andrew W. Young, A. Mike Burton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We investigated the relationships between individual differences in different aspects of face-identity processing,using the Glasgow Face Matching Test (GFMT) as a measure of unfamiliar face perception, the Cambridge FaceMemory Test (CFMT) as a measure of new face learning, and the Before They Were Famous task (BTWF) as ameasure of familiar face recognition. These measures were integrated into two separate studies examining therelationship between face processing and other tasks. For Study 1 we gathered participants’subjective ratings oftheir own face perception abilities. In Study 2 we used additional measures of perceptual and cognitive abilities,and personality factors to place individual differences in a broader context.Performance was significantly correlated across the three face-identity tasks in both studies, suggesting somedegree of commonality of underlying mechanisms. For Study 1 the participants’self-ratings correlated poorlywith performance, reaching significance only for judgements of familiar face recognition. In Study 2 there werefew associations between face tasks and other measures, with task-level influences seeming to account for thesmall number of associations present. In general, face tasks correlated with each other, but did not show anoverall relation with other perceptual, cognitive or personality tests. Our findings are consistent with the existenceof a general face-perception factor, able to account for around 25% of the variance in scores. However, otherrelatively task-specific influences are also clearly operating
LanguageEnglish
Article number21
Number of pages15
JournalCognitive Research: Principles and Implications
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Individuality
Aptitude
Personality Tests
Personality
Facial Recognition
Learning

Keywords

  • face recognition
  • face perception
  • unfamiliar faces
  • familiar faces
  • individual differences
  • facial recognition

Cite this

McCaffery, Jennifer M. ; Robertson, David J. ; Young, Andrew W. ; Burton, A. Mike. / Individual differences in face identity processing. In: Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 2018 ; Vol. 3.
@article{f4fd5b69b40d4951ad59484fd2e088a8,
title = "Individual differences in face identity processing",
abstract = "We investigated the relationships between individual differences in different aspects of face-identity processing,using the Glasgow Face Matching Test (GFMT) as a measure of unfamiliar face perception, the Cambridge FaceMemory Test (CFMT) as a measure of new face learning, and the Before They Were Famous task (BTWF) as ameasure of familiar face recognition. These measures were integrated into two separate studies examining therelationship between face processing and other tasks. For Study 1 we gathered participants’subjective ratings oftheir own face perception abilities. In Study 2 we used additional measures of perceptual and cognitive abilities,and personality factors to place individual differences in a broader context.Performance was significantly correlated across the three face-identity tasks in both studies, suggesting somedegree of commonality of underlying mechanisms. For Study 1 the participants’self-ratings correlated poorlywith performance, reaching significance only for judgements of familiar face recognition. In Study 2 there werefew associations between face tasks and other measures, with task-level influences seeming to account for thesmall number of associations present. In general, face tasks correlated with each other, but did not show anoverall relation with other perceptual, cognitive or personality tests. Our findings are consistent with the existenceof a general face-perception factor, able to account for around 25{\%} of the variance in scores. However, otherrelatively task-specific influences are also clearly operating",
keywords = "face recognition, face perception, unfamiliar faces, familiar faces, individual differences, facial recognition",
author = "McCaffery, {Jennifer M.} and Robertson, {David J.} and Young, {Andrew W.} and Burton, {A. Mike}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications",
issn = "2365-7464",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag",

}

Individual differences in face identity processing. / McCaffery, Jennifer M.; Robertson, David J. ; Young, Andrew W.; Burton, A. Mike.

In: Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, Vol. 3, 21, 27.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in face identity processing

AU - McCaffery, Jennifer M.

AU - Robertson, David J.

AU - Young, Andrew W.

AU - Burton, A. Mike

PY - 2018/6/27

Y1 - 2018/6/27

N2 - We investigated the relationships between individual differences in different aspects of face-identity processing,using the Glasgow Face Matching Test (GFMT) as a measure of unfamiliar face perception, the Cambridge FaceMemory Test (CFMT) as a measure of new face learning, and the Before They Were Famous task (BTWF) as ameasure of familiar face recognition. These measures were integrated into two separate studies examining therelationship between face processing and other tasks. For Study 1 we gathered participants’subjective ratings oftheir own face perception abilities. In Study 2 we used additional measures of perceptual and cognitive abilities,and personality factors to place individual differences in a broader context.Performance was significantly correlated across the three face-identity tasks in both studies, suggesting somedegree of commonality of underlying mechanisms. For Study 1 the participants’self-ratings correlated poorlywith performance, reaching significance only for judgements of familiar face recognition. In Study 2 there werefew associations between face tasks and other measures, with task-level influences seeming to account for thesmall number of associations present. In general, face tasks correlated with each other, but did not show anoverall relation with other perceptual, cognitive or personality tests. Our findings are consistent with the existenceof a general face-perception factor, able to account for around 25% of the variance in scores. However, otherrelatively task-specific influences are also clearly operating

AB - We investigated the relationships between individual differences in different aspects of face-identity processing,using the Glasgow Face Matching Test (GFMT) as a measure of unfamiliar face perception, the Cambridge FaceMemory Test (CFMT) as a measure of new face learning, and the Before They Were Famous task (BTWF) as ameasure of familiar face recognition. These measures were integrated into two separate studies examining therelationship between face processing and other tasks. For Study 1 we gathered participants’subjective ratings oftheir own face perception abilities. In Study 2 we used additional measures of perceptual and cognitive abilities,and personality factors to place individual differences in a broader context.Performance was significantly correlated across the three face-identity tasks in both studies, suggesting somedegree of commonality of underlying mechanisms. For Study 1 the participants’self-ratings correlated poorlywith performance, reaching significance only for judgements of familiar face recognition. In Study 2 there werefew associations between face tasks and other measures, with task-level influences seeming to account for thesmall number of associations present. In general, face tasks correlated with each other, but did not show anoverall relation with other perceptual, cognitive or personality tests. Our findings are consistent with the existenceof a general face-perception factor, able to account for around 25% of the variance in scores. However, otherrelatively task-specific influences are also clearly operating

KW - face recognition

KW - face perception

KW - unfamiliar faces

KW - familiar faces

KW - individual differences

KW - facial recognition

U2 - 10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9

DO - 10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

T2 - Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

JF - Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

SN - 2365-7464

M1 - 21

ER -