Incorporating jurisdiction issues into regional carbon accounts under production and consumption accounting principles

Karen Turner, M. Munday, Stuart McIntyre, C. D. Jensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite increased public interest, policy makers have been slow to enact targets based on limiting emissions under full consumption accounting measures (such as carbon footprints). We argue that this may be due to the fact that policy makers in one jurisdiction do not have control over production technologies used in other jurisdictions. We use a regional input output framework and data derived on carbon dioxide emissions by industry (and households) to examine regional accountability for emissions generation. In so doing, we consider two accounting methods which permit greater accountability of regional private and public (household and government) final consumption as the main driver of regional emissions generation, while retaining focus on the local production technology and consumption decisions which fall under the jurisdiction of regional policy makers. We propose that these methods permit an attribution of emissions generation that is likely to be of more use than a full global footprint analysis to regional policy makers.
LanguageEnglish
Pages722-741
Number of pages20
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

jurisdiction
carbon
regional policy
accountability
overproduction
responsibility
carbon footprint
public interest
footprint
attribution
carbon dioxide
driver
consumption
accounting
industry
policy
household
method
public

Keywords

  • footprint
  • input-output analysis
  • trade
  • UK
  • models
  • global environmental impact
  • consumer responsibility
  • jurisdiction issues
  • regional carbon accounts
  • production
  • consumption
  • accounting principles

Cite this

@article{6a28b152283d47718ca935185b60fc4e,
title = "Incorporating jurisdiction issues into regional carbon accounts under production and consumption accounting principles",
abstract = "Despite increased public interest, policy makers have been slow to enact targets based on limiting emissions under full consumption accounting measures (such as carbon footprints). We argue that this may be due to the fact that policy makers in one jurisdiction do not have control over production technologies used in other jurisdictions. We use a regional input output framework and data derived on carbon dioxide emissions by industry (and households) to examine regional accountability for emissions generation. In so doing, we consider two accounting methods which permit greater accountability of regional private and public (household and government) final consumption as the main driver of regional emissions generation, while retaining focus on the local production technology and consumption decisions which fall under the jurisdiction of regional policy makers. We propose that these methods permit an attribution of emissions generation that is likely to be of more use than a full global footprint analysis to regional policy makers.",
keywords = "footprint, input-output analysis, trade, UK, models, global environmental impact, consumer responsibility, jurisdiction issues, regional carbon accounts, production, consumption, accounting principles",
author = "Karen Turner and M. Munday and Stuart McIntyre and Jensen, {C. D.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1068/a43234",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "722--741",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
number = "3",

}

Incorporating jurisdiction issues into regional carbon accounts under production and consumption accounting principles. / Turner, Karen; Munday, M.; McIntyre, Stuart; Jensen, C. D.

In: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 43, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 722-741.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incorporating jurisdiction issues into regional carbon accounts under production and consumption accounting principles

AU - Turner, Karen

AU - Munday, M.

AU - McIntyre, Stuart

AU - Jensen, C. D.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Despite increased public interest, policy makers have been slow to enact targets based on limiting emissions under full consumption accounting measures (such as carbon footprints). We argue that this may be due to the fact that policy makers in one jurisdiction do not have control over production technologies used in other jurisdictions. We use a regional input output framework and data derived on carbon dioxide emissions by industry (and households) to examine regional accountability for emissions generation. In so doing, we consider two accounting methods which permit greater accountability of regional private and public (household and government) final consumption as the main driver of regional emissions generation, while retaining focus on the local production technology and consumption decisions which fall under the jurisdiction of regional policy makers. We propose that these methods permit an attribution of emissions generation that is likely to be of more use than a full global footprint analysis to regional policy makers.

AB - Despite increased public interest, policy makers have been slow to enact targets based on limiting emissions under full consumption accounting measures (such as carbon footprints). We argue that this may be due to the fact that policy makers in one jurisdiction do not have control over production technologies used in other jurisdictions. We use a regional input output framework and data derived on carbon dioxide emissions by industry (and households) to examine regional accountability for emissions generation. In so doing, we consider two accounting methods which permit greater accountability of regional private and public (household and government) final consumption as the main driver of regional emissions generation, while retaining focus on the local production technology and consumption decisions which fall under the jurisdiction of regional policy makers. We propose that these methods permit an attribution of emissions generation that is likely to be of more use than a full global footprint analysis to regional policy makers.

KW - footprint

KW - input-output analysis

KW - trade

KW - UK

KW - models

KW - global environmental impact

KW - consumer responsibility

KW - jurisdiction issues

KW - regional carbon accounts

KW - production

KW - consumption

KW - accounting principles

U2 - 10.1068/a43234

DO - 10.1068/a43234

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 722

EP - 741

JO - Environment and Planning A

T2 - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 3

ER -