In praise of preprints

Norman K. Fry*, Helina Marshall, Tasha Mellins-Cohen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Tom Sheldon’s article published in July 2018 entitled ‘Preprints could promote confusion and distortion’ [1] generated some heated debate and responses in both social media and the scientific literature [2–4]. Here we present some thoughts and views from the Microbiology Society, a notfor-profit membership charity for scientists interested in microbes and the publisher of a number of international peer-reviewed journals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)489-491
Number of pages3
JournalMicrobiology (United Kingdom)
Volume165
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Keywords

  • editorial policy
  • peer review
  • preprints
  • social media
  • scientific literature
  • Microbiology Society
  • peer-reviewed journals
  • publication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In praise of preprints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this