Abstract
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 269-275 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Legal Ethics |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- legal ethics
- discrimation
- legal system
Cite this
}
In defence of contextually sensitive moral activism. / Nicolson, Donald.
In: Legal Ethics, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2004, p. 269-275.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - In defence of contextually sensitive moral activism
AU - Nicolson, Donald
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Argues that there is no blanket justification for lawyers acting as neutral partisans. Instead, depending on the particular practice context and all the unique circumstances of each individual case, lawyers may be justified in refusing to represent particular individuals or (after moral dialogue) to do everything legal and not prohibited by professional rules for them.
AB - Argues that there is no blanket justification for lawyers acting as neutral partisans. Instead, depending on the particular practice context and all the unique circumstances of each individual case, lawyers may be justified in refusing to represent particular individuals or (after moral dialogue) to do everything legal and not prohibited by professional rules for them.
KW - legal ethics
KW - discrimation
KW - legal system
UR - http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hart/legeth/2004/00000007/00000002/art00012
M3 - Article
VL - 7
SP - 269
EP - 275
JO - Legal Ethics
T2 - Legal Ethics
JF - Legal Ethics
SN - 1460-728X
IS - 2
ER -