Abstract
This paper provides a practical, systematic approach to the design and delivery of a Delphi survey. We prescribe a sequence of six steps to do with (i) setting up the Delphi process – including selecting respondents and generating a requisite number of focal issues, (ii) software/delivery choice, (iii) developing question items and response scales, (iv) providing feedback between a requisite number of Delphi rounds, (v) preventing and dealing with panellist drop out, and (vi) analysing and presenting the Delphi yield. At each step, the Delphi administrator has a range of choice options and we provide discussion of the pros and cons of each option - in order that the overall design and delivery of a particular Delphi survey is both well-founded and defensible.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 72-82 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Technological Forecasting and Social Change |
| Volume | 147 |
| Early online date | 19 Jul 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Oct 2019 |
Keywords
- Delphi
- review
- methodology
- judgement
- expert
- consensus
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: a six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver