TY - GEN
T1 - Improving the accuracy of transformer DGA diagnosis in the presence of conflicting evidence
AU - Aizpurua, Jose Ignacio
AU - Catterson, Victoria M.
AU - Stewart, Brian G.
AU - McArthur, Stephen D. J.
AU - Lambert, Brandon
AU - Ampofo, Bismark
AU - Pereira, Gavin
AU - Cross, James G.
N1 - © 2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works
PY - 2017/8/18
Y1 - 2017/8/18
N2 - Transformers are critical assets for the reliable and cost-effective operation of the power grid. Transformers may fail if condition monitoring does not identify degraded conditions in time. Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) focuses on the examination of the dissolved gasses in the transformer oil and there exist different methods for transformer fault diagnosis based on different analyses of the gassing levels. However, these methods can give conflicting results, and it is not always clear which model is most accurate in a given situation. This paper presents a novel evidence combination framework for DGA based on Bayesian networks. Bayesian network models embed expert knowledge along with learned data patterns and evidence combination which aids in the consistency of analysis. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is validated using the IEC TC 10 dataset with a maximum diagnosis accuracy of 88.3%.
AB - Transformers are critical assets for the reliable and cost-effective operation of the power grid. Transformers may fail if condition monitoring does not identify degraded conditions in time. Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) focuses on the examination of the dissolved gasses in the transformer oil and there exist different methods for transformer fault diagnosis based on different analyses of the gassing levels. However, these methods can give conflicting results, and it is not always clear which model is most accurate in a given situation. This paper presents a novel evidence combination framework for DGA based on Bayesian networks. Bayesian network models embed expert knowledge along with learned data patterns and evidence combination which aids in the consistency of analysis. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is validated using the IEC TC 10 dataset with a maximum diagnosis accuracy of 88.3%.
KW - dissolved gas analysis
KW - DGA
KW - transformer diagnosis
KW - condition monitoring
KW - Bayesian networks
KW - evidence combination
KW - ensembles
U2 - 10.1109/EIC.2017.8004698
DO - 10.1109/EIC.2017.8004698
M3 - Conference contribution book
SN - 9781509039654
BT - 2017 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC)
PB - IEEE
CY - Piscataway, NJ
T2 - IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference 2017
Y2 - 11 June 2017 through 14 June 2017
ER -