### Abstract

This paper presents updated estimates of source parameters for GW150914, a binary black-hole coalescence event detected by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) in 2015 [Abbott

*et al.*Phys. Rev. Lett.**116**, 061102 (2016).]. Abbott*et al.*[Phys. Rev. Lett.**116**, 241102 (2016).] presented parameter estimation of the source using a 13-dimensional, phenomenological precessing-spin model (precessing IMRPhenom) and an 11-dimensional nonprecessing effective-one-body (EOB) model calibrated to numerical-relativity simulations, which forces spin alignment (nonprecessing EOBNR). Here, we present new results that include a 15-dimensional precessing-spin waveform model (precessing EOBNR) developed within the EOB formalism. We find good agreement with the parameters estimated previously [Abbott*et al.*Phys. Rev. Lett.**116**, 241102 (2016).], and we quote updated component masses of 35+5−3 M⊙ and 30+3−4 M⊙ (where errors correspond to 90% symmetric credible intervals). We also present slightly tighter constraints on the dimensionless spin magnitudes of the two black holes, with a primary spin estimate <0.65 and a secondary spin estimate <0.75 at 90% probability. Abbott*et al.*[Phys. Rev. Lett.**116**, 241102 (2016).] estimated the systematic parameter-extraction errors due to waveform-model uncertainty by combining the posterior probability densities of precessing IMRPhenom and nonprecessing EOBNR. Here, we find that the two precessing-spin models are in closer agreement, suggesting that these systematic errors are smaller than previously quoted.Original language | English |
---|---|

Article number | 041014 |

Number of pages | 19 |

Journal | Physical Review X |

Volume | 6 |

Issue number | 4 |

DOIs | |

Publication status | Published - 21 Oct 2016 |

### Keywords

- LIGO
- gravitational wave detection
- GW150914
- effective-one-body
- EOB
- binary black holes
- spin waveform model
- gravitation

## Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Improved analysis of GW150914 using a fully spin-precessing waveform model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

## Cite this

LIGO Scientific Collaboration, & Virgo Collaboration (2016). Improved analysis of GW150914 using a fully spin-precessing waveform model.

*Physical Review X*,*6*(4), [041014]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041014