Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomised controlled study

Stuart W. Bell, Iain Anthony, Bryn Jones, Angus MacLean, Philip Rowe, Mark Blyth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

86 Citations (Scopus)
43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Higher revision rates have been reported in patients who have undergone unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty, with poor component positioning identified as a factor in implant failure. A robotic-assisted surgical procedure has been proposed as a method of improving the accuracy of component implantation in arthroplasty. The aim of this prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial was to evaluate the accuracy of component positioning in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty comparing robotic-assisted and conventional implantation techniques. One hundred and thirty-nine patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either a robotic-assisted surgical procedure using the MAKO Robotic Interactive Orthopaedic Arm (RIO) system or a conventional surgical procedure using the Oxford Phase-3 unicompartmental knee replacement with traditional instrumentation. A postoperative computed tomographic scan was performed at three months to assess the accuracy of the axial, coronal, and sagittal component positioning. Data were available for 120 patients, sixty-two who had undergone robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and fifty-eight who had undergone conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Intraobserver agreement was good for all measured component parameters. The accuracy of component positioning was improved with the use of the robotic-assisted surgical procedure, with lower root mean square errors and significantly lower median errors in all component parameters (p < 0.01). The proportion of patients with component implantation within 2° of the target position was significantly greater in the group who underwent robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with the group who underwent conventional unicompartmental knee arthroscopy with regard to the femoral component sagittal position (57% compared with 26%, p = 0.0008), femoral component coronal position (70% compared with 28%, p = 0.0001), femoral component axial position (53% compared with 31%, p = 0.0163), tibial component sagittal position (80% compared with 22%, p = 0.0001), and tibial component axial position (48% compared with 19%, p = 0.0009). Robotic-assisted surgical procedures with the use of the MAKO RIO lead to improved accuracy of implant positioning compared with conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgical techniques.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)627-635
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British
Volume98
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Apr 2016

Keywords

  • knee arthroplasty
  • limb malalignment
  • implant positioning
  • robotic assisted surgical procedures

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomised controlled study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this