Implementing regulatory innovations in Europe: the case of impact assessment

Fabrizio De Francesco, Claudio M. Radaelli, Vera E. Troeger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) has become a major tool on the agenda of regulatory reform across Europe. Although the literature on RIA is burgeoning, the comparative analysis of implementation has been neglected. This article draws on implementation theory to formulate expectations about the political costs and benefits of different degrees of implementation. Implementation ranges from political endorsement to the creation of central units in charge of regulatory quality and the production and publication of RIA results and methods. Our findings show that economic integration, the characteristics of the political system, economic resources, bureaucratic efficiency and pressure group activities play different roles in the various stages of implementation. We discuss the policy implications of these findings in terms of priorities given to different processes of regulatory reform and the demands that innovations like RIA pose on administrative capacity and stakeholders’ participation.
LanguageEnglish
Pages491-511
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume19
Issue number4
Early online date26 Aug 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

innovation
pressure group
reform
economic integration
role play
political system
stakeholder
efficiency
participation
costs
resources
economics

Keywords

  • regulatory impact assessment
  • better regulation
  • European Union
  • governance
  • implementation
  • regulation

Cite this

De Francesco, Fabrizio ; Radaelli, Claudio M. ; Troeger, Vera E. / Implementing regulatory innovations in Europe : the case of impact assessment. In: Journal of European Public Policy. 2012 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 491-511.
@article{681955d125114c7bbb96fac9b6c6b84c,
title = "Implementing regulatory innovations in Europe: the case of impact assessment",
abstract = "Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) has become a major tool on the agenda of regulatory reform across Europe. Although the literature on RIA is burgeoning, the comparative analysis of implementation has been neglected. This article draws on implementation theory to formulate expectations about the political costs and benefits of different degrees of implementation. Implementation ranges from political endorsement to the creation of central units in charge of regulatory quality and the production and publication of RIA results and methods. Our findings show that economic integration, the characteristics of the political system, economic resources, bureaucratic efficiency and pressure group activities play different roles in the various stages of implementation. We discuss the policy implications of these findings in terms of priorities given to different processes of regulatory reform and the demands that innovations like RIA pose on administrative capacity and stakeholders’ participation.",
keywords = "regulatory impact assessment, better regulation, European Union, governance, implementation, regulation",
author = "{De Francesco}, Fabrizio and Radaelli, {Claudio M.} and Troeger, {Vera E.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/13501763.2011.607342",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "491--511",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
number = "4",

}

Implementing regulatory innovations in Europe : the case of impact assessment. / De Francesco, Fabrizio; Radaelli, Claudio M.; Troeger, Vera E.

In: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2012, p. 491-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing regulatory innovations in Europe

T2 - Journal of European Public Policy

AU - De Francesco, Fabrizio

AU - Radaelli, Claudio M.

AU - Troeger, Vera E.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) has become a major tool on the agenda of regulatory reform across Europe. Although the literature on RIA is burgeoning, the comparative analysis of implementation has been neglected. This article draws on implementation theory to formulate expectations about the political costs and benefits of different degrees of implementation. Implementation ranges from political endorsement to the creation of central units in charge of regulatory quality and the production and publication of RIA results and methods. Our findings show that economic integration, the characteristics of the political system, economic resources, bureaucratic efficiency and pressure group activities play different roles in the various stages of implementation. We discuss the policy implications of these findings in terms of priorities given to different processes of regulatory reform and the demands that innovations like RIA pose on administrative capacity and stakeholders’ participation.

AB - Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) has become a major tool on the agenda of regulatory reform across Europe. Although the literature on RIA is burgeoning, the comparative analysis of implementation has been neglected. This article draws on implementation theory to formulate expectations about the political costs and benefits of different degrees of implementation. Implementation ranges from political endorsement to the creation of central units in charge of regulatory quality and the production and publication of RIA results and methods. Our findings show that economic integration, the characteristics of the political system, economic resources, bureaucratic efficiency and pressure group activities play different roles in the various stages of implementation. We discuss the policy implications of these findings in terms of priorities given to different processes of regulatory reform and the demands that innovations like RIA pose on administrative capacity and stakeholders’ participation.

KW - regulatory impact assessment

KW - better regulation

KW - European Union

KW - governance

KW - implementation

KW - regulation

U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2011.607342

DO - 10.1080/13501763.2011.607342

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 491

EP - 511

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 4

ER -