Abstract
This study delves into the challenge of efficiently digitalising wind turbine maintenance data, traditionally hindered by non‐standardised formats necessitating manual, expert intervention. Highlighting the discrepancies in past reliability studies based on different key performance indicators (KPIs), the paper underscores the importance of consistent standards, like RDS‐PP, for maintenance data categorisation. Leveraging on established digitalisation workflows, we investigate the efficacy of text classifiers in automating the categorisation process against conventional manual labelling. Results indicate that while classifiers exhibit high performance for specific datasets, their general applicability across diverse wind farms is limited at the present stage. Furthermore, differences in failure rate KPIs derived from manual versus classifier‐processed data reveal uncertainties in both methods. The study suggests that enhanced clarity in maintenance reporting and refined designation systems can lead to more accurate KPIs.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3463-3479 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | IET Renewable Power Generation |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 15 |
Early online date | 7 Nov 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 16 Nov 2024 |
Funding
The present work was mostly carried out within the research project “Digitalisation of Maintenance Information (DigMa)” funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK), grant number 03EE2016A. The authors thank the project partners for providing field data and for sharing their requirements and experience. Further financial support was received by EPSRC through the Wind and Marine Energy Systems Centre for Doctoral Training under the grant number EP/S023801/1.
Keywords
- reliability
- data acquisition
- statistical analysis
- data analysis
- sensitivity analysis
- wind power plants
- wind turbines