Impact of strategic behavior and ownership of energy storage on provision of flexibility

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issue

  • 8 Citations

Abstract

Energy Storage Systems (ESS) are expected to provide additional flexibility to managed variable power flows in future power systems. It is believed that the business case for ESS as an alternative to traditional network reinforcements can be improved if the assets are able to access additional revenue streams by participating in energy and ancillary services markets. To enable this, the storage may need to be operated by private merchants to circumvent the unbundling principle applied in electricity markets today. However, it is not clear if the right incentives are in place for these entities to operate the ESS in a way that provides the required flexibility and supports the wider system benefits sought by the System Operator (SO). This work seeks to evaluate the impact of strategic behavior of an independent trader operating ESS in a nodal electricity market. The results indicated that a strategic bidder operating ESS tends to underuse the assets leading to suboptimal solution in terms of market welfare, as well as congestion and curtailment reduction, removing some of the potential benefits the ESS can provide to the power system.
LanguageEnglish
Pages744 - 754
Number of pages11
JournalIEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy
Volume7
Issue number2
Early online date17 Dec 2015
DOIs
StatePublished - 30 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Energy storage
Reinforcement
Industry
Power markets

Keywords

  • bi-level programming
  • energy storage
  • ownership
  • offering strategy
  • price-based market clearing

Cite this

@article{cb1edcb938884e298c0806d1c11c0baf,
title = "Impact of strategic behavior and ownership of energy storage on provision of flexibility",
abstract = "Energy Storage Systems (ESS) are expected to provide additional flexibility to managed variable power flows in future power systems. It is believed that the business case for ESS as an alternative to traditional network reinforcements can be improved if the assets are able to access additional revenue streams by participating in energy and ancillary services markets. To enable this, the storage may need to be operated by private merchants to circumvent the unbundling principle applied in electricity markets today. However, it is not clear if the right incentives are in place for these entities to operate the ESS in a way that provides the required flexibility and supports the wider system benefits sought by the System Operator (SO). This work seeks to evaluate the impact of strategic behavior of an independent trader operating ESS in a nodal electricity market. The results indicated that a strategic bidder operating ESS tends to underuse the assets leading to suboptimal solution in terms of market welfare, as well as congestion and curtailment reduction, removing some of the potential benefits the ESS can provide to the power system.",
keywords = "bi-level programming, energy storage, ownership, offering strategy, price-based market clearing",
author = "Karl Hartwig and Ivana Kockar",
note = "(c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other users, including reprinting/ republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted components of this work in other works.",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1109/TSTE.2015.2497967",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "744 -- 754",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy",
issn = "1949-3029",
number = "2",

}

Impact of strategic behavior and ownership of energy storage on provision of flexibility. / Hartwig, Karl; Kockar, Ivana.

In: IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, Vol. 7, No. 2, 30.04.2016, p. 744 - 754.

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issue

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of strategic behavior and ownership of energy storage on provision of flexibility

AU - Hartwig,Karl

AU - Kockar,Ivana

N1 - (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other users, including reprinting/ republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted components of this work in other works.

PY - 2016/4/30

Y1 - 2016/4/30

N2 - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) are expected to provide additional flexibility to managed variable power flows in future power systems. It is believed that the business case for ESS as an alternative to traditional network reinforcements can be improved if the assets are able to access additional revenue streams by participating in energy and ancillary services markets. To enable this, the storage may need to be operated by private merchants to circumvent the unbundling principle applied in electricity markets today. However, it is not clear if the right incentives are in place for these entities to operate the ESS in a way that provides the required flexibility and supports the wider system benefits sought by the System Operator (SO). This work seeks to evaluate the impact of strategic behavior of an independent trader operating ESS in a nodal electricity market. The results indicated that a strategic bidder operating ESS tends to underuse the assets leading to suboptimal solution in terms of market welfare, as well as congestion and curtailment reduction, removing some of the potential benefits the ESS can provide to the power system.

AB - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) are expected to provide additional flexibility to managed variable power flows in future power systems. It is believed that the business case for ESS as an alternative to traditional network reinforcements can be improved if the assets are able to access additional revenue streams by participating in energy and ancillary services markets. To enable this, the storage may need to be operated by private merchants to circumvent the unbundling principle applied in electricity markets today. However, it is not clear if the right incentives are in place for these entities to operate the ESS in a way that provides the required flexibility and supports the wider system benefits sought by the System Operator (SO). This work seeks to evaluate the impact of strategic behavior of an independent trader operating ESS in a nodal electricity market. The results indicated that a strategic bidder operating ESS tends to underuse the assets leading to suboptimal solution in terms of market welfare, as well as congestion and curtailment reduction, removing some of the potential benefits the ESS can provide to the power system.

KW - bi-level programming

KW - energy storage

KW - ownership

KW - offering strategy

KW - price-based market clearing

UR - http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=5165391

U2 - 10.1109/TSTE.2015.2497967

DO - 10.1109/TSTE.2015.2497967

M3 - Special issue

VL - 7

SP - 744

EP - 754

JO - IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy

T2 - IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy

JF - IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy

SN - 1949-3029

IS - 2

ER -