Impact of prior perception on bridge health diagnosis

C. Cappello, D. Zonta, M. Pozzi, B. Glisic, R. Zandonini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We use Bayesian logic in reproducing how a rational agent, called Ernest in the paper, analyses monitoring data and infers structural condition. The case study is Adige Bridge, a 260 m-long statically indeterminate structure with a deck supported by 12 stay cables. Bridge structural redundancy, possible relaxation losses and an as-built condition differing from design suggest that long-term load redistribution between cables can be expected. Therefore, the bridge owner installed a monitoring system, including fiberoptic sensors that allow measurement of deformation with an accuracy of a few microstrains. After 1 year of system operation, which included maintenance of the interrogation unit, the data analysis showed an apparent contraction of the cable lengths. This result is in contrast with the expected behavior. We analyze how a rational agent analyzes the observed response, and, in particular, we discuss to what extent he is prone to accept the sensor response as a result of the real mechanical behavior of the bridge versus a mere malfunction of the interrogation unit. In this analysis, we consider four psychological profiles, which vary based on their personal trust in the reliability of the instrumentation and on their knowledge of the structural behavior of the bridge. Using Bayesian logic as a tool to combine prior belief with sensor data, we explore how the extent of prior knowledge can alter the final engineering perception of the current state of the bridge and we demonstrate how the engineer’s posterior judgment is predictable with a mathematical model. Formal reproduction of the human decision-making process can have strong impact in the field of structural health monitoring, as it may enable: (1) quantification of probabilities that engineers attribute to various events based on their subjective experience (which is currently an important challenge); (2) better understanding and improvement of the decision-making process itself; (3) embedding of decision making into structural health-monitoring methods for the full benefit of the latter.

LanguageEnglish
Pages509-525
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Sep 2015

Fingerprint

Health
Cables
Decision making
Structural health monitoring
Sensors
Engineers
Monitoring
Redundancy
Mathematical models

Keywords

  • Bayesian analysis
  • cable-stayed bridge
  • data interpretation
  • fiberoptic sensors
  • heuristic reasoning
  • structural health monitoring

Cite this

Cappello, C. ; Zonta, D. ; Pozzi, M. ; Glisic, B. ; Zandonini, R. / Impact of prior perception on bridge health diagnosis. In: Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring. 2015 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 509-525.
@article{78070134c5a14f8ba0bf88b0bf336b99,
title = "Impact of prior perception on bridge health diagnosis",
abstract = "We use Bayesian logic in reproducing how a rational agent, called Ernest in the paper, analyses monitoring data and infers structural condition. The case study is Adige Bridge, a 260 m-long statically indeterminate structure with a deck supported by 12 stay cables. Bridge structural redundancy, possible relaxation losses and an as-built condition differing from design suggest that long-term load redistribution between cables can be expected. Therefore, the bridge owner installed a monitoring system, including fiberoptic sensors that allow measurement of deformation with an accuracy of a few microstrains. After 1 year of system operation, which included maintenance of the interrogation unit, the data analysis showed an apparent contraction of the cable lengths. This result is in contrast with the expected behavior. We analyze how a rational agent analyzes the observed response, and, in particular, we discuss to what extent he is prone to accept the sensor response as a result of the real mechanical behavior of the bridge versus a mere malfunction of the interrogation unit. In this analysis, we consider four psychological profiles, which vary based on their personal trust in the reliability of the instrumentation and on their knowledge of the structural behavior of the bridge. Using Bayesian logic as a tool to combine prior belief with sensor data, we explore how the extent of prior knowledge can alter the final engineering perception of the current state of the bridge and we demonstrate how the engineer’s posterior judgment is predictable with a mathematical model. Formal reproduction of the human decision-making process can have strong impact in the field of structural health monitoring, as it may enable: (1) quantification of probabilities that engineers attribute to various events based on their subjective experience (which is currently an important challenge); (2) better understanding and improvement of the decision-making process itself; (3) embedding of decision making into structural health-monitoring methods for the full benefit of the latter.",
keywords = "Bayesian analysis, cable-stayed bridge, data interpretation, fiberoptic sensors, heuristic reasoning, structural health monitoring",
author = "C. Cappello and D. Zonta and M. Pozzi and B. Glisic and R. Zandonini",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1007/s13349-015-0120-0",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "509--525",
journal = "Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring",
issn = "2190-5452",
number = "4",

}

Cappello, C, Zonta, D, Pozzi, M, Glisic, B & Zandonini, R 2015, 'Impact of prior perception on bridge health diagnosis' Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 509-525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-015-0120-0

Impact of prior perception on bridge health diagnosis. / Cappello, C.; Zonta, D.; Pozzi, M.; Glisic, B.; Zandonini, R.

In: Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 5, No. 4, 23.09.2015, p. 509-525.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of prior perception on bridge health diagnosis

AU - Cappello, C.

AU - Zonta, D.

AU - Pozzi, M.

AU - Glisic, B.

AU - Zandonini, R.

PY - 2015/9/23

Y1 - 2015/9/23

N2 - We use Bayesian logic in reproducing how a rational agent, called Ernest in the paper, analyses monitoring data and infers structural condition. The case study is Adige Bridge, a 260 m-long statically indeterminate structure with a deck supported by 12 stay cables. Bridge structural redundancy, possible relaxation losses and an as-built condition differing from design suggest that long-term load redistribution between cables can be expected. Therefore, the bridge owner installed a monitoring system, including fiberoptic sensors that allow measurement of deformation with an accuracy of a few microstrains. After 1 year of system operation, which included maintenance of the interrogation unit, the data analysis showed an apparent contraction of the cable lengths. This result is in contrast with the expected behavior. We analyze how a rational agent analyzes the observed response, and, in particular, we discuss to what extent he is prone to accept the sensor response as a result of the real mechanical behavior of the bridge versus a mere malfunction of the interrogation unit. In this analysis, we consider four psychological profiles, which vary based on their personal trust in the reliability of the instrumentation and on their knowledge of the structural behavior of the bridge. Using Bayesian logic as a tool to combine prior belief with sensor data, we explore how the extent of prior knowledge can alter the final engineering perception of the current state of the bridge and we demonstrate how the engineer’s posterior judgment is predictable with a mathematical model. Formal reproduction of the human decision-making process can have strong impact in the field of structural health monitoring, as it may enable: (1) quantification of probabilities that engineers attribute to various events based on their subjective experience (which is currently an important challenge); (2) better understanding and improvement of the decision-making process itself; (3) embedding of decision making into structural health-monitoring methods for the full benefit of the latter.

AB - We use Bayesian logic in reproducing how a rational agent, called Ernest in the paper, analyses monitoring data and infers structural condition. The case study is Adige Bridge, a 260 m-long statically indeterminate structure with a deck supported by 12 stay cables. Bridge structural redundancy, possible relaxation losses and an as-built condition differing from design suggest that long-term load redistribution between cables can be expected. Therefore, the bridge owner installed a monitoring system, including fiberoptic sensors that allow measurement of deformation with an accuracy of a few microstrains. After 1 year of system operation, which included maintenance of the interrogation unit, the data analysis showed an apparent contraction of the cable lengths. This result is in contrast with the expected behavior. We analyze how a rational agent analyzes the observed response, and, in particular, we discuss to what extent he is prone to accept the sensor response as a result of the real mechanical behavior of the bridge versus a mere malfunction of the interrogation unit. In this analysis, we consider four psychological profiles, which vary based on their personal trust in the reliability of the instrumentation and on their knowledge of the structural behavior of the bridge. Using Bayesian logic as a tool to combine prior belief with sensor data, we explore how the extent of prior knowledge can alter the final engineering perception of the current state of the bridge and we demonstrate how the engineer’s posterior judgment is predictable with a mathematical model. Formal reproduction of the human decision-making process can have strong impact in the field of structural health monitoring, as it may enable: (1) quantification of probabilities that engineers attribute to various events based on their subjective experience (which is currently an important challenge); (2) better understanding and improvement of the decision-making process itself; (3) embedding of decision making into structural health-monitoring methods for the full benefit of the latter.

KW - Bayesian analysis

KW - cable-stayed bridge

KW - data interpretation

KW - fiberoptic sensors

KW - heuristic reasoning

KW - structural health monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941947853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13349-015-0120-0

DO - 10.1007/s13349-015-0120-0

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 509

EP - 525

JO - Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

T2 - Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

JF - Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

SN - 2190-5452

IS - 4

ER -