Abstract
Under what conditions can cabinet ministers affect the government’s policy agenda? Existing literature provides conflicting answers to this question. In this article, I show that some politicians are more likely than others to influence policy. Specifically, I consider three types of ministers: loyalists, who are loyal to their party leader and prioritize office over policy; partisans, who are party heavyweights and aspiring leaders; and ideologues, who have fixed policy ideas and are unwilling to compromise over office perks. I argue that ideologues and partisans will affect policy more than loyalists do. Using a novel data set on ministerial backgrounds, and examining the area of social welfare policy in 18 countries, I find support for my theoretical expectations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1051-1086 |
Number of pages | 36 |
Journal | Comparative Political Studies |
Volume | 48 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2015 |
Keywords
- cabinets
- social welfare programs
- political economy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ideologues, partisans and loyalists: cabinet ministers and social welfare reform in parliamentary democracies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
Datasets
-
Replication data for Ideologues, Partisans and Loyalists: cabinet ministers and social welfare reform in parliamentary democracies
Alexiadou, D. (Creator), University of Strathclyde, 13 Sept 2018
DOI: 10.15129/8924f6fa-c7d4-479b-8fd6-aa8f998439a5
Dataset