Identifying solidarity: the ILC project on the protection of persons in disasters and human rights

Therese O'Donnell, Craig Allan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The article considers the ambitious International Law Commission (ILC) project on the draft articles on the protection of persons in disasters and its declaration of solidarity on the part of the international community towards disaster-stricken individuals. The project adopted a rights-based approach and by its focus on a duty of international cooperation initially suggested a radical move to a more explicit intertwining of protective duties of disaster-affected states and various external actors. The ILC project also seemed to signpost a new direction for human rights protection. By moving away from the oft-criticized, but still powerful, model of treaty-making driven by identity politics, the ILC draft Articles focused instead on a broad notion of universal humanity and needs-based assistance. This article considers the need for the ILC project, its rationale and its particular provisions as regards the responsibilities of various actors when a natural disaster strikes. In articulating what he understood by “solidarity,” the project’s Special Rapporteur invoked specific writings by Emer de Vattel. This article evaluates the ILC draft Articles in the light of this particular understanding of solidarity. The article concludes that the draft Articles in their current form do not meaningfully establish a partnership of immediate post-disaster humanitarian assistance between a disaster-affected state and relevant external actors (particularly third states). The full potential of the duty of cooperation has been thwarted by concerns and objections expressed by states during the drafting process. Further, by allowing offers of assistance to remain a matter of discretion, for states in particular, the draft Articles simply privilege the Westphalian preserve. It would seem that for many external actors, the plight of disaster victims will continue to be someone else’s problem and one which they do not wish to identify or identify with.
LanguageEnglish
Pages53-95
Number of pages43
JournalGeorge Washington International Law Review
Volume49
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

international law
solidarity
disaster
human rights
human being
assistance
matter of discretion
international cooperation
strike
treaty
privilege
natural disaster
responsibility
politics
community

Keywords

  • identity
  • natural disasters
  • international law commission

Cite this

@article{ea7f5c01806242038b98ed2bde292e92,
title = "Identifying solidarity: the ILC project on the protection of persons in disasters and human rights",
abstract = "The article considers the ambitious International Law Commission (ILC) project on the draft articles on the protection of persons in disasters and its declaration of solidarity on the part of the international community towards disaster-stricken individuals. The project adopted a rights-based approach and by its focus on a duty of international cooperation initially suggested a radical move to a more explicit intertwining of protective duties of disaster-affected states and various external actors. The ILC project also seemed to signpost a new direction for human rights protection. By moving away from the oft-criticized, but still powerful, model of treaty-making driven by identity politics, the ILC draft Articles focused instead on a broad notion of universal humanity and needs-based assistance. This article considers the need for the ILC project, its rationale and its particular provisions as regards the responsibilities of various actors when a natural disaster strikes. In articulating what he understood by “solidarity,” the project’s Special Rapporteur invoked specific writings by Emer de Vattel. This article evaluates the ILC draft Articles in the light of this particular understanding of solidarity. The article concludes that the draft Articles in their current form do not meaningfully establish a partnership of immediate post-disaster humanitarian assistance between a disaster-affected state and relevant external actors (particularly third states). The full potential of the duty of cooperation has been thwarted by concerns and objections expressed by states during the drafting process. Further, by allowing offers of assistance to remain a matter of discretion, for states in particular, the draft Articles simply privilege the Westphalian preserve. It would seem that for many external actors, the plight of disaster victims will continue to be someone else’s problem and one which they do not wish to identify or identify with.",
keywords = "identity, natural disasters, international law commission",
author = "Therese O'Donnell and Craig Allan",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "31",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "53--95",
journal = "George Washington International Law Review",
issn = "1534-9977",
number = "1",

}

Identifying solidarity : the ILC project on the protection of persons in disasters and human rights. / O'Donnell, Therese; Allan, Craig.

In: George Washington International Law Review, Vol. 49, No. 1, 31.01.2017, p. 53-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying solidarity

T2 - George Washington International Law Review

AU - O'Donnell, Therese

AU - Allan, Craig

PY - 2017/1/31

Y1 - 2017/1/31

N2 - The article considers the ambitious International Law Commission (ILC) project on the draft articles on the protection of persons in disasters and its declaration of solidarity on the part of the international community towards disaster-stricken individuals. The project adopted a rights-based approach and by its focus on a duty of international cooperation initially suggested a radical move to a more explicit intertwining of protective duties of disaster-affected states and various external actors. The ILC project also seemed to signpost a new direction for human rights protection. By moving away from the oft-criticized, but still powerful, model of treaty-making driven by identity politics, the ILC draft Articles focused instead on a broad notion of universal humanity and needs-based assistance. This article considers the need for the ILC project, its rationale and its particular provisions as regards the responsibilities of various actors when a natural disaster strikes. In articulating what he understood by “solidarity,” the project’s Special Rapporteur invoked specific writings by Emer de Vattel. This article evaluates the ILC draft Articles in the light of this particular understanding of solidarity. The article concludes that the draft Articles in their current form do not meaningfully establish a partnership of immediate post-disaster humanitarian assistance between a disaster-affected state and relevant external actors (particularly third states). The full potential of the duty of cooperation has been thwarted by concerns and objections expressed by states during the drafting process. Further, by allowing offers of assistance to remain a matter of discretion, for states in particular, the draft Articles simply privilege the Westphalian preserve. It would seem that for many external actors, the plight of disaster victims will continue to be someone else’s problem and one which they do not wish to identify or identify with.

AB - The article considers the ambitious International Law Commission (ILC) project on the draft articles on the protection of persons in disasters and its declaration of solidarity on the part of the international community towards disaster-stricken individuals. The project adopted a rights-based approach and by its focus on a duty of international cooperation initially suggested a radical move to a more explicit intertwining of protective duties of disaster-affected states and various external actors. The ILC project also seemed to signpost a new direction for human rights protection. By moving away from the oft-criticized, but still powerful, model of treaty-making driven by identity politics, the ILC draft Articles focused instead on a broad notion of universal humanity and needs-based assistance. This article considers the need for the ILC project, its rationale and its particular provisions as regards the responsibilities of various actors when a natural disaster strikes. In articulating what he understood by “solidarity,” the project’s Special Rapporteur invoked specific writings by Emer de Vattel. This article evaluates the ILC draft Articles in the light of this particular understanding of solidarity. The article concludes that the draft Articles in their current form do not meaningfully establish a partnership of immediate post-disaster humanitarian assistance between a disaster-affected state and relevant external actors (particularly third states). The full potential of the duty of cooperation has been thwarted by concerns and objections expressed by states during the drafting process. Further, by allowing offers of assistance to remain a matter of discretion, for states in particular, the draft Articles simply privilege the Westphalian preserve. It would seem that for many external actors, the plight of disaster victims will continue to be someone else’s problem and one which they do not wish to identify or identify with.

KW - identity

KW - natural disasters

KW - international law commission

UR - http://www.gwilr.org/

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 53

EP - 95

JO - George Washington International Law Review

JF - George Washington International Law Review

SN - 1534-9977

IS - 1

ER -