Human rights: would our rights be better protected in or out of Europe?

Aileen McHarg

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

To understand the implications of Brexit for fundamental rights protection, it is important to distinguish between two legal Europes. The primary human rights regime in Europe is the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) – a treaty drawn up by the Council of Europe, which is an older organisation than the EU with a much wider membership. The UK ratified the ECHR in 1951, and since 1966, UK citizens have been able to take cases alleging breaches of Convention rights to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Strasbourg. In 1998, the ECHR was incorporated into the UK’s legal systems by the Human Rights Act (HRA) and the devolution statutes, thereby enabling Convention rights to be enforced in UK courts as well.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationBritain’s Decision
Subtitle of host publicationFacts and Impartial Analysis for the EU Referendum on 23 June 2016
EditorsCharlie Jeffery, Ray Perman
Place of PublicationEdinburgh
Pages64-68
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

ECHR
human rights
Council of Europe
fundamental right
legal system
treaty
statute
decentralization
EU
act
citizen

Keywords

  • European union
  • Brexit
  • referendum
  • human rights
  • fundamental rights

Cite this

McHarg, A. (2016). Human rights: would our rights be better protected in or out of Europe? In C. Jeffery, & R. Perman (Eds.), Britain’s Decision: Facts and Impartial Analysis for the EU Referendum on 23 June 2016 (pp. 64-68). Edinburgh.
McHarg, Aileen. / Human rights : would our rights be better protected in or out of Europe?. Britain’s Decision: Facts and Impartial Analysis for the EU Referendum on 23 June 2016. editor / Charlie Jeffery ; Ray Perman. Edinburgh, 2016. pp. 64-68
@inbook{5dce2dff480f49c4a2f8d9f4f37a02c8,
title = "Human rights: would our rights be better protected in or out of Europe?",
abstract = "To understand the implications of Brexit for fundamental rights protection, it is important to distinguish between two legal Europes. The primary human rights regime in Europe is the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) – a treaty drawn up by the Council of Europe, which is an older organisation than the EU with a much wider membership. The UK ratified the ECHR in 1951, and since 1966, UK citizens have been able to take cases alleging breaches of Convention rights to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Strasbourg. In 1998, the ECHR was incorporated into the UK’s legal systems by the Human Rights Act (HRA) and the devolution statutes, thereby enabling Convention rights to be enforced in UK courts as well.",
keywords = "European union, Brexit, referendum, human rights, fundamental rights",
author = "Aileen McHarg",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "30",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-9932780-1-3",
pages = "64--68",
editor = "Charlie Jeffery and Ray Perman",
booktitle = "Britain’s Decision",

}

McHarg, A 2016, Human rights: would our rights be better protected in or out of Europe? in C Jeffery & R Perman (eds), Britain’s Decision: Facts and Impartial Analysis for the EU Referendum on 23 June 2016. Edinburgh, pp. 64-68.

Human rights : would our rights be better protected in or out of Europe? / McHarg, Aileen.

Britain’s Decision: Facts and Impartial Analysis for the EU Referendum on 23 June 2016. ed. / Charlie Jeffery; Ray Perman. Edinburgh, 2016. p. 64-68.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Human rights

T2 - would our rights be better protected in or out of Europe?

AU - McHarg, Aileen

PY - 2016/4/30

Y1 - 2016/4/30

N2 - To understand the implications of Brexit for fundamental rights protection, it is important to distinguish between two legal Europes. The primary human rights regime in Europe is the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) – a treaty drawn up by the Council of Europe, which is an older organisation than the EU with a much wider membership. The UK ratified the ECHR in 1951, and since 1966, UK citizens have been able to take cases alleging breaches of Convention rights to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Strasbourg. In 1998, the ECHR was incorporated into the UK’s legal systems by the Human Rights Act (HRA) and the devolution statutes, thereby enabling Convention rights to be enforced in UK courts as well.

AB - To understand the implications of Brexit for fundamental rights protection, it is important to distinguish between two legal Europes. The primary human rights regime in Europe is the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) – a treaty drawn up by the Council of Europe, which is an older organisation than the EU with a much wider membership. The UK ratified the ECHR in 1951, and since 1966, UK citizens have been able to take cases alleging breaches of Convention rights to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Strasbourg. In 1998, the ECHR was incorporated into the UK’s legal systems by the Human Rights Act (HRA) and the devolution statutes, thereby enabling Convention rights to be enforced in UK courts as well.

KW - European union

KW - Brexit

KW - referendum

KW - human rights

KW - fundamental rights

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-0-9932780-1-3

SP - 64

EP - 68

BT - Britain’s Decision

A2 - Jeffery, Charlie

A2 - Perman, Ray

CY - Edinburgh

ER -

McHarg A. Human rights: would our rights be better protected in or out of Europe? In Jeffery C, Perman R, editors, Britain’s Decision: Facts and Impartial Analysis for the EU Referendum on 23 June 2016. Edinburgh. 2016. p. 64-68