How to conceptualise energy law and policy for an interdisciplinary audience: the case of post-Brexit UK

Paul Cairney, Aileen McHarg, Nicola McEwen, Karen Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Interdisciplinary energy research is essential. It advances our understanding of potential transitions from high to low carbon energy systems. However, it is easier to propose than deliver. It requires translation into a simpler language, to aid communication, but not at the expense of the conceptual language that drives our understanding of complex energy systems. We combine legal, political science, and policy studies to show how to balance the need to communicate accessibly and recognise legal and policymaking complexity. We begin with a statement so accepted in legal studies that it has become a truism: the law in the books is not the same as the law in action. The allocation of legal competences is only one influence on policymaking in a complex system. We describe three key ways to conceptualise this relationship between law, policy, and energy systems, focusing on the: (1) ‘on paper’ legal separation of powers between different governments, (2) interaction between law and policy in practice, including blurry boundaries between formal responsibility and informal influence, and (3) role of law as one of many contributors to policymaking. We use these approaches to explain the implications of Brexit for UK energy policy.
LanguageEnglish
Pages459-466
Number of pages8
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume129
Early online date22 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Energy policy
Large scale systems
energy
Carbon
Law
Communication
energy policy
separation of powers
policy studies
science studies
language
political science
communication
policy
carbon
responsibility
interaction

Keywords

  • energy law and policy
  • multi-level policymaking
  • energy systems
  • complex systems
  • UK
  • Scotland
  • Brexit

Cite this

@article{2ff0f857745f4064a16a82183d5b4e14,
title = "How to conceptualise energy law and policy for an interdisciplinary audience: the case of post-Brexit UK",
abstract = "Interdisciplinary energy research is essential. It advances our understanding of potential transitions from high to low carbon energy systems. However, it is easier to propose than deliver. It requires translation into a simpler language, to aid communication, but not at the expense of the conceptual language that drives our understanding of complex energy systems. We combine legal, political science, and policy studies to show how to balance the need to communicate accessibly and recognise legal and policymaking complexity. We begin with a statement so accepted in legal studies that it has become a truism: the law in the books is not the same as the law in action. The allocation of legal competences is only one influence on policymaking in a complex system. We describe three key ways to conceptualise this relationship between law, policy, and energy systems, focusing on the: (1) ‘on paper’ legal separation of powers between different governments, (2) interaction between law and policy in practice, including blurry boundaries between formal responsibility and informal influence, and (3) role of law as one of many contributors to policymaking. We use these approaches to explain the implications of Brexit for UK energy policy.",
keywords = "energy law and policy, multi-level policymaking, energy systems, complex systems, UK, Scotland, Brexit",
author = "Paul Cairney and Aileen McHarg and Nicola McEwen and Karen Turner",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.022",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "459--466",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",

}

How to conceptualise energy law and policy for an interdisciplinary audience : the case of post-Brexit UK. / Cairney, Paul; McHarg, Aileen; McEwen, Nicola ; Turner, Karen.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 129, 30.06.2019, p. 459-466.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to conceptualise energy law and policy for an interdisciplinary audience

T2 - Energy Policy

AU - Cairney, Paul

AU - McHarg, Aileen

AU - McEwen, Nicola

AU - Turner, Karen

PY - 2019/6/30

Y1 - 2019/6/30

N2 - Interdisciplinary energy research is essential. It advances our understanding of potential transitions from high to low carbon energy systems. However, it is easier to propose than deliver. It requires translation into a simpler language, to aid communication, but not at the expense of the conceptual language that drives our understanding of complex energy systems. We combine legal, political science, and policy studies to show how to balance the need to communicate accessibly and recognise legal and policymaking complexity. We begin with a statement so accepted in legal studies that it has become a truism: the law in the books is not the same as the law in action. The allocation of legal competences is only one influence on policymaking in a complex system. We describe three key ways to conceptualise this relationship between law, policy, and energy systems, focusing on the: (1) ‘on paper’ legal separation of powers between different governments, (2) interaction between law and policy in practice, including blurry boundaries between formal responsibility and informal influence, and (3) role of law as one of many contributors to policymaking. We use these approaches to explain the implications of Brexit for UK energy policy.

AB - Interdisciplinary energy research is essential. It advances our understanding of potential transitions from high to low carbon energy systems. However, it is easier to propose than deliver. It requires translation into a simpler language, to aid communication, but not at the expense of the conceptual language that drives our understanding of complex energy systems. We combine legal, political science, and policy studies to show how to balance the need to communicate accessibly and recognise legal and policymaking complexity. We begin with a statement so accepted in legal studies that it has become a truism: the law in the books is not the same as the law in action. The allocation of legal competences is only one influence on policymaking in a complex system. We describe three key ways to conceptualise this relationship between law, policy, and energy systems, focusing on the: (1) ‘on paper’ legal separation of powers between different governments, (2) interaction between law and policy in practice, including blurry boundaries between formal responsibility and informal influence, and (3) role of law as one of many contributors to policymaking. We use these approaches to explain the implications of Brexit for UK energy policy.

KW - energy law and policy

KW - multi-level policymaking

KW - energy systems

KW - complex systems

KW - UK

KW - Scotland

KW - Brexit

UR - https://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy-policy

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.022

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.022

M3 - Article

VL - 129

SP - 459

EP - 466

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

ER -