How to compare performances of firms operating in different sectors?

U. Bititci, S.U.O. Firat, P. Garengo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper seeks to address the question ‘How to measure different SMEs’ performances comparatively?’ An initial review reveals that the literature does not provide objective and explicit debate on the subject. Consequently, an approach is developed, informed by the literature, which is used to compare the performances of 37 SMEs. The consistency and reliability of the approach is tested, resulting in a ranking of the 37 firms according to their performances. Using cluster and factor analysis the paper demonstrates that leading indicators are somewhat redundant, and that lagging indicators have greater significance for the purpose of comparative measurement of different SMEs performances. Whilst the approach adopted here withstood internal and external validity tests and can be seen as a robust way of comparing SMEs performances, these results may be limited to this study.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-18
Number of pages18
JournalProduction Planning and Control
Volume24
Issue number12
Early online date10 Jan 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Cluster analysis
Factor analysis
Small and medium-sized enterprises

Keywords

  • SMEs
  • performance
  • measurement
  • comparisons
  • benchmarking

Cite this

Bititci, U. ; Firat, S.U.O. ; Garengo, P. / How to compare performances of firms operating in different sectors?. In: Production Planning and Control. 2013 ; Vol. 24, No. 12. pp. 1-18.
@article{42878cef611d48098cfad97267eb94eb,
title = "How to compare performances of firms operating in different sectors?",
abstract = "This paper seeks to address the question ‘How to measure different SMEs’ performances comparatively?’ An initial review reveals that the literature does not provide objective and explicit debate on the subject. Consequently, an approach is developed, informed by the literature, which is used to compare the performances of 37 SMEs. The consistency and reliability of the approach is tested, resulting in a ranking of the 37 firms according to their performances. Using cluster and factor analysis the paper demonstrates that leading indicators are somewhat redundant, and that lagging indicators have greater significance for the purpose of comparative measurement of different SMEs performances. Whilst the approach adopted here withstood internal and external validity tests and can be seen as a robust way of comparing SMEs performances, these results may be limited to this study.",
keywords = "SMEs, performance, measurement, comparisons, benchmarking",
author = "U. Bititci and S.U.O. Firat and P. Garengo",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/09537287.2011.643829",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Production Planning and Control",
issn = "0953-7287",
number = "12",

}

How to compare performances of firms operating in different sectors? / Bititci, U.; Firat, S.U.O.; Garengo, P.

In: Production Planning and Control, Vol. 24, No. 12, 2013, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to compare performances of firms operating in different sectors?

AU - Bititci, U.

AU - Firat, S.U.O.

AU - Garengo, P.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper seeks to address the question ‘How to measure different SMEs’ performances comparatively?’ An initial review reveals that the literature does not provide objective and explicit debate on the subject. Consequently, an approach is developed, informed by the literature, which is used to compare the performances of 37 SMEs. The consistency and reliability of the approach is tested, resulting in a ranking of the 37 firms according to their performances. Using cluster and factor analysis the paper demonstrates that leading indicators are somewhat redundant, and that lagging indicators have greater significance for the purpose of comparative measurement of different SMEs performances. Whilst the approach adopted here withstood internal and external validity tests and can be seen as a robust way of comparing SMEs performances, these results may be limited to this study.

AB - This paper seeks to address the question ‘How to measure different SMEs’ performances comparatively?’ An initial review reveals that the literature does not provide objective and explicit debate on the subject. Consequently, an approach is developed, informed by the literature, which is used to compare the performances of 37 SMEs. The consistency and reliability of the approach is tested, resulting in a ranking of the 37 firms according to their performances. Using cluster and factor analysis the paper demonstrates that leading indicators are somewhat redundant, and that lagging indicators have greater significance for the purpose of comparative measurement of different SMEs performances. Whilst the approach adopted here withstood internal and external validity tests and can be seen as a robust way of comparing SMEs performances, these results may be limited to this study.

KW - SMEs

KW - performance

KW - measurement

KW - comparisons

KW - benchmarking

UR - http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713737146~link=cover

U2 - 10.1080/09537287.2011.643829

DO - 10.1080/09537287.2011.643829

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Production Planning and Control

T2 - Production Planning and Control

JF - Production Planning and Control

SN - 0953-7287

IS - 12

ER -