How technological change affects power relations in global markets: remote developers in the console and mobile games industry

Rachel Parker, Stephen Cox, Paul Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper focuses on Australian development firms in the console and mobile games industry in order to understand how small firms in a geographically remote and marginal position in the global industry are able to relate to global firms and capture revenue share. This paper shows that, while technological change in the games industry has resulted in the emergence of new industry segments based on transactional rather than relational forms of economic coordination, in which we might therefore expect less asymmetrical power relations, lead firms retain a position of power in the global games entertainment industry relative to remote developers. This has been possible because lead firms in the emerging mobile devices market have developed and sustained bottlenecks in their segment of the industry through platform competition and the development of an intensely competitive ecosystem of developers. Our research shows the critical role of platform competition and bottlenecks in influencing power asymmetries within global markets.
LanguageEnglish
Pages168–185
Number of pages18
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

power relations
technological change
firm
market
industry
entertainment industry
asymmetry
revenue
ecosystem
economics

Keywords

  • global value chains
  • small and medium-sized enterprises
  • standards competition
  • platform competition
  • market power

Cite this

@article{0c5fd123b1cd4ca9a11267ba0727e6ce,
title = "How technological change affects power relations in global markets: remote developers in the console and mobile games industry",
abstract = "This paper focuses on Australian development firms in the console and mobile games industry in order to understand how small firms in a geographically remote and marginal position in the global industry are able to relate to global firms and capture revenue share. This paper shows that, while technological change in the games industry has resulted in the emergence of new industry segments based on transactional rather than relational forms of economic coordination, in which we might therefore expect less asymmetrical power relations, lead firms retain a position of power in the global games entertainment industry relative to remote developers. This has been possible because lead firms in the emerging mobile devices market have developed and sustained bottlenecks in their segment of the industry through platform competition and the development of an intensely competitive ecosystem of developers. Our research shows the critical role of platform competition and bottlenecks in influencing power asymmetries within global markets.",
keywords = "global value chains, small and medium-sized enterprises, standards competition, platform competition, market power",
author = "Rachel Parker and Stephen Cox and Paul Thompson",
note = "Rachel Parker, Stephen Cox, Paul Thompson, 2014. The definitive, peer-reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Environment and Planning A, 46(1), 168–185, DOI: 10.1068/a45663",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1068/a45663",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "168–185",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
number = "1",

}

How technological change affects power relations in global markets : remote developers in the console and mobile games industry. / Parker, Rachel; Cox, Stephen ; Thompson, Paul.

In: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 46, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 168–185 .

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How technological change affects power relations in global markets

T2 - Environment and Planning A

AU - Parker, Rachel

AU - Cox, Stephen

AU - Thompson, Paul

N1 - Rachel Parker, Stephen Cox, Paul Thompson, 2014. The definitive, peer-reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Environment and Planning A, 46(1), 168–185, DOI: 10.1068/a45663

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - This paper focuses on Australian development firms in the console and mobile games industry in order to understand how small firms in a geographically remote and marginal position in the global industry are able to relate to global firms and capture revenue share. This paper shows that, while technological change in the games industry has resulted in the emergence of new industry segments based on transactional rather than relational forms of economic coordination, in which we might therefore expect less asymmetrical power relations, lead firms retain a position of power in the global games entertainment industry relative to remote developers. This has been possible because lead firms in the emerging mobile devices market have developed and sustained bottlenecks in their segment of the industry through platform competition and the development of an intensely competitive ecosystem of developers. Our research shows the critical role of platform competition and bottlenecks in influencing power asymmetries within global markets.

AB - This paper focuses on Australian development firms in the console and mobile games industry in order to understand how small firms in a geographically remote and marginal position in the global industry are able to relate to global firms and capture revenue share. This paper shows that, while technological change in the games industry has resulted in the emergence of new industry segments based on transactional rather than relational forms of economic coordination, in which we might therefore expect less asymmetrical power relations, lead firms retain a position of power in the global games entertainment industry relative to remote developers. This has been possible because lead firms in the emerging mobile devices market have developed and sustained bottlenecks in their segment of the industry through platform competition and the development of an intensely competitive ecosystem of developers. Our research shows the critical role of platform competition and bottlenecks in influencing power asymmetries within global markets.

KW - global value chains

KW - small and medium-sized enterprises

KW - standards competition

KW - platform competition

KW - market power

UR - http://www.envplan.com/A.html

U2 - 10.1068/a45663

DO - 10.1068/a45663

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 168

EP - 185

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 1

ER -