How reflective is the academic essay?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    36 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The purpose of this study was to examine the extent of reflection in academic essays. Forty essays, all previously deemed to be of merit quality, were analysed in terms of three elements of reflection - how the educational issue is conceptualized; what the issue means for practice; how practice might be changed to resolve the problematic. Each element was then assigned one of four levels of reflection - technical, descriptive, dialogical and critical. The main finding was that most of the elements were either at a descriptive level of reflection (which the literature argues is not difficult to achieve) or at a dialogical level (which recognizes that knowledge is not certain but does not tease out the relative merits of differing views). These different levels of reflection are seen as adevelopmental stages (from naïve to sophisticated) in gaining control over the process of co-ordinating extant understanding and new evidence
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages75-89
    Number of pages14
    JournalStudies in Higher Education
    Volume29
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2004

    Fingerprint

    evidence
    literature

    Keywords

    • higher education
    • essay writing
    • essays
    • reflection
    • learning

    Cite this

    @article{6105c9ffe1264039a84e1c0d603734d6,
    title = "How reflective is the academic essay?",
    abstract = "The purpose of this study was to examine the extent of reflection in academic essays. Forty essays, all previously deemed to be of merit quality, were analysed in terms of three elements of reflection - how the educational issue is conceptualized; what the issue means for practice; how practice might be changed to resolve the problematic. Each element was then assigned one of four levels of reflection - technical, descriptive, dialogical and critical. The main finding was that most of the elements were either at a descriptive level of reflection (which the literature argues is not difficult to achieve) or at a dialogical level (which recognizes that knowledge is not certain but does not tease out the relative merits of differing views). These different levels of reflection are seen as adevelopmental stages (from na{\"i}ve to sophisticated) in gaining control over the process of co-ordinating extant understanding and new evidence",
    keywords = "higher education, essay writing, essays, reflection, learning",
    author = "Effie Maclellan",
    year = "2004",
    month = "2",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1080/1234567032000164886",
    language = "English",
    volume = "29",
    pages = "75--89",
    journal = "Studies in Higher Education",
    issn = "0307-5079",
    number = "1",

    }

    How reflective is the academic essay? / Maclellan, Effie.

    In: Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.02.2004, p. 75-89.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How reflective is the academic essay?

    AU - Maclellan, Effie

    PY - 2004/2/1

    Y1 - 2004/2/1

    N2 - The purpose of this study was to examine the extent of reflection in academic essays. Forty essays, all previously deemed to be of merit quality, were analysed in terms of three elements of reflection - how the educational issue is conceptualized; what the issue means for practice; how practice might be changed to resolve the problematic. Each element was then assigned one of four levels of reflection - technical, descriptive, dialogical and critical. The main finding was that most of the elements were either at a descriptive level of reflection (which the literature argues is not difficult to achieve) or at a dialogical level (which recognizes that knowledge is not certain but does not tease out the relative merits of differing views). These different levels of reflection are seen as adevelopmental stages (from naïve to sophisticated) in gaining control over the process of co-ordinating extant understanding and new evidence

    AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the extent of reflection in academic essays. Forty essays, all previously deemed to be of merit quality, were analysed in terms of three elements of reflection - how the educational issue is conceptualized; what the issue means for practice; how practice might be changed to resolve the problematic. Each element was then assigned one of four levels of reflection - technical, descriptive, dialogical and critical. The main finding was that most of the elements were either at a descriptive level of reflection (which the literature argues is not difficult to achieve) or at a dialogical level (which recognizes that knowledge is not certain but does not tease out the relative merits of differing views). These different levels of reflection are seen as adevelopmental stages (from naïve to sophisticated) in gaining control over the process of co-ordinating extant understanding and new evidence

    KW - higher education

    KW - essay writing

    KW - essays

    KW - reflection

    KW - learning

    U2 - 10.1080/1234567032000164886

    DO - 10.1080/1234567032000164886

    M3 - Article

    VL - 29

    SP - 75

    EP - 89

    JO - Studies in Higher Education

    T2 - Studies in Higher Education

    JF - Studies in Higher Education

    SN - 0307-5079

    IS - 1

    ER -