How radical is student engagement? (And what is it for?)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper argues that the term ‘student engagement’ as used in UK higher
    education covers activities with two distinct sets of benefits: those that are
    pedagogical, and those that are political. Without an overarching account of the
    value of student engagement that can unify these two sets of benefits, the concept of student engagement in the UK is therefore fundamentally fractured. The paper proposes that critical pedagogy can provide that underpinning account, but at the expense of the current mainstream nature of student engagement. The paper therefore argues that those working in student engagement in UK higher education face a dilemma: either sacrifice the idea of student engagement as a popular solution to mainstream challenges, or give up the idea that student engagement has a unified set of benefits and coherent purpose.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages1-23
    Number of pages23
    JournalStudent Engagement and Experience Journal
    Volume3
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    student
    education

    Keywords

    • student engagement
    • student participation
    • student involvement

    Cite this

    @article{20b6fa1586834d279e0936ef76b1748c,
    title = "How radical is student engagement? (And what is it for?)",
    abstract = "This paper argues that the term ‘student engagement’ as used in UK highereducation covers activities with two distinct sets of benefits: those that arepedagogical, and those that are political. Without an overarching account of thevalue of student engagement that can unify these two sets of benefits, the concept of student engagement in the UK is therefore fundamentally fractured. The paper proposes that critical pedagogy can provide that underpinning account, but at the expense of the current mainstream nature of student engagement. The paper therefore argues that those working in student engagement in UK higher education face a dilemma: either sacrifice the idea of student engagement as a popular solution to mainstream challenges, or give up the idea that student engagement has a unified set of benefits and coherent purpose.",
    keywords = "student engagement, student participation, student involvement",
    author = "Alex Buckley",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.7190/seej.v3i2.95",
    language = "English",
    volume = "3",
    pages = "1--23",
    journal = "Student Engagement and Experience Journal",
    number = "2",

    }

    How radical is student engagement? (And what is it for?). / Buckley, Alex.

    In: Student Engagement and Experience Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2014, p. 1-23.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How radical is student engagement? (And what is it for?)

    AU - Buckley, Alex

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - This paper argues that the term ‘student engagement’ as used in UK highereducation covers activities with two distinct sets of benefits: those that arepedagogical, and those that are political. Without an overarching account of thevalue of student engagement that can unify these two sets of benefits, the concept of student engagement in the UK is therefore fundamentally fractured. The paper proposes that critical pedagogy can provide that underpinning account, but at the expense of the current mainstream nature of student engagement. The paper therefore argues that those working in student engagement in UK higher education face a dilemma: either sacrifice the idea of student engagement as a popular solution to mainstream challenges, or give up the idea that student engagement has a unified set of benefits and coherent purpose.

    AB - This paper argues that the term ‘student engagement’ as used in UK highereducation covers activities with two distinct sets of benefits: those that arepedagogical, and those that are political. Without an overarching account of thevalue of student engagement that can unify these two sets of benefits, the concept of student engagement in the UK is therefore fundamentally fractured. The paper proposes that critical pedagogy can provide that underpinning account, but at the expense of the current mainstream nature of student engagement. The paper therefore argues that those working in student engagement in UK higher education face a dilemma: either sacrifice the idea of student engagement as a popular solution to mainstream challenges, or give up the idea that student engagement has a unified set of benefits and coherent purpose.

    KW - student engagement

    KW - student participation

    KW - student involvement

    UR - http://research.shu.ac.uk/SEEJ

    U2 - 10.7190/seej.v3i2.95

    DO - 10.7190/seej.v3i2.95

    M3 - Article

    VL - 3

    SP - 1

    EP - 23

    JO - Student Engagement and Experience Journal

    T2 - Student Engagement and Experience Journal

    JF - Student Engagement and Experience Journal

    IS - 2

    ER -