How many steps/day are enough? for adults

Catrine Tudor-Locke, Cora L. Craig, Wendy J. Brown, Stacy A. Clemes, Katrien De Cocker, Billie Giles-Corti, Yoshiro Hatano, Shigeru Inoue, Sandra M. Matsudo, Nanette Mutrie, Jean-Michel Oppert, David A. Rowe, Michael D. Schmidt, Grant M. Schofield, John C. Spence, Pedro J. Teixeira, Mark A. Tully, Steven N. Blair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

368 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Physical activity guidelines from around the world are typically expressed in terms of frequency, duration, and intensity parameters. Objective monitoring using pedometers and accelerometers offers a new opportunity to measure and communicate physical activity in terms of steps/day. Various step-based versions or translations of physical activity guidelines are emerging, reflecting public interest in such guidance. However, there appears to be a wide discrepancy in the exact values that are being communicated. It makes sense that step-based recommendations should be harmonious with existing evidence-based public health guidelines that recognize that "some physical activity is better than none" while maintaining a focus on time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Thus, the purpose of this review was to update our existing knowledge of "How many steps/day are enough?", and to inform step-based recommendations consistent with current physical activity guidelines. Normative data indicate that healthy adults typically take between 4,000 and 18,000 steps/day, and that 10,000 steps/day is reasonable for this population, although there are notable "low active populations." Interventions demonstrate incremental increases on the order of 2,000-2,500 steps/day. The results of seven different controlled studies demonstrate that there is a strong relationship between cadence and intensity. Further, despite some inter-individual variation, 100 steps/minute represents a reasonable floor value indicative of moderate intensity walking. Multiplying this cadence by 30 minutes (i.e., typical of a daily recommendation) produces a minimum of 3,000 steps that is best used as a heuristic (i.e., guiding) value, but these steps must be taken over and above habitual activity levels to be a true expression of free-living steps/day that also includes recommendations for minimal amounts of time in MVPA. Computed steps/day translations of time in MVPA that also include estimates of habitual activity levels equate to 7,100 to 11,000 steps/day. A direct estimate of minimal amounts of MVPA accumulated in the course of objectively monitored free-living behaviour is 7,000-8,000 steps/day. A scale that spans a wide range of incremental increases in steps/day and is congruent with public health recognition that "some physical activity is better than none," yet still incorporates step-based translations of recommended amounts of time in MVPA may be useful in research and practice. The full range of users (researchers to practitioners to the general public) of objective monitoring instruments that provide step-based outputs require good reference data and evidence-based recommendations to be able to design effective health messages congruent with public health physical activity guidelines, guide behaviour change, and ultimately measure, track, and interpret steps/day.
LanguageEnglish
Article number79
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Volume8
Issue number79
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Exercise
Guidelines
Public Health
General Practitioners
Population
Walking
Research Personnel
Health
Research

Keywords

  • walking
  • pedometer-based walking
  • pedometers
  • accelerometers

Cite this

Tudor-Locke, C., Craig, C. L., Brown, W. J., Clemes, S. A., De Cocker, K., Giles-Corti, B., ... Blair, S. N. (2011). How many steps/day are enough? for adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8(79), [79]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-79
Tudor-Locke, Catrine ; Craig, Cora L. ; Brown, Wendy J. ; Clemes, Stacy A. ; De Cocker, Katrien ; Giles-Corti, Billie ; Hatano, Yoshiro ; Inoue, Shigeru ; Matsudo, Sandra M. ; Mutrie, Nanette ; Oppert, Jean-Michel ; Rowe, David A. ; Schmidt, Michael D. ; Schofield, Grant M. ; Spence, John C. ; Teixeira, Pedro J. ; Tully, Mark A. ; Blair, Steven N. / How many steps/day are enough? for adults. In: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2011 ; Vol. 8, No. 79.
@article{de52c67f1fb4461190eaead424225061,
title = "How many steps/day are enough? for adults",
abstract = "Physical activity guidelines from around the world are typically expressed in terms of frequency, duration, and intensity parameters. Objective monitoring using pedometers and accelerometers offers a new opportunity to measure and communicate physical activity in terms of steps/day. Various step-based versions or translations of physical activity guidelines are emerging, reflecting public interest in such guidance. However, there appears to be a wide discrepancy in the exact values that are being communicated. It makes sense that step-based recommendations should be harmonious with existing evidence-based public health guidelines that recognize that {"}some physical activity is better than none{"} while maintaining a focus on time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Thus, the purpose of this review was to update our existing knowledge of {"}How many steps/day are enough?{"}, and to inform step-based recommendations consistent with current physical activity guidelines. Normative data indicate that healthy adults typically take between 4,000 and 18,000 steps/day, and that 10,000 steps/day is reasonable for this population, although there are notable {"}low active populations.{"} Interventions demonstrate incremental increases on the order of 2,000-2,500 steps/day. The results of seven different controlled studies demonstrate that there is a strong relationship between cadence and intensity. Further, despite some inter-individual variation, 100 steps/minute represents a reasonable floor value indicative of moderate intensity walking. Multiplying this cadence by 30 minutes (i.e., typical of a daily recommendation) produces a minimum of 3,000 steps that is best used as a heuristic (i.e., guiding) value, but these steps must be taken over and above habitual activity levels to be a true expression of free-living steps/day that also includes recommendations for minimal amounts of time in MVPA. Computed steps/day translations of time in MVPA that also include estimates of habitual activity levels equate to 7,100 to 11,000 steps/day. A direct estimate of minimal amounts of MVPA accumulated in the course of objectively monitored free-living behaviour is 7,000-8,000 steps/day. A scale that spans a wide range of incremental increases in steps/day and is congruent with public health recognition that {"}some physical activity is better than none,{"} yet still incorporates step-based translations of recommended amounts of time in MVPA may be useful in research and practice. The full range of users (researchers to practitioners to the general public) of objective monitoring instruments that provide step-based outputs require good reference data and evidence-based recommendations to be able to design effective health messages congruent with public health physical activity guidelines, guide behaviour change, and ultimately measure, track, and interpret steps/day.",
keywords = "walking, pedometer-based walking, pedometers, accelerometers",
author = "Catrine Tudor-Locke and Craig, {Cora L.} and Brown, {Wendy J.} and Clemes, {Stacy A.} and {De Cocker}, Katrien and Billie Giles-Corti and Yoshiro Hatano and Shigeru Inoue and Matsudo, {Sandra M.} and Nanette Mutrie and Jean-Michel Oppert and Rowe, {David A.} and Schmidt, {Michael D.} and Schofield, {Grant M.} and Spence, {John C.} and Teixeira, {Pedro J.} and Tully, {Mark A.} and Blair, {Steven N.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1186/1479-5868-8-79",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity",
issn = "1479-5868",
number = "79",

}

Tudor-Locke, C, Craig, CL, Brown, WJ, Clemes, SA, De Cocker, K, Giles-Corti, B, Hatano, Y, Inoue, S, Matsudo, SM, Mutrie, N, Oppert, J-M, Rowe, DA, Schmidt, MD, Schofield, GM, Spence, JC, Teixeira, PJ, Tully, MA & Blair, SN 2011, 'How many steps/day are enough? for adults' International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, vol. 8, no. 79, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-79

How many steps/day are enough? for adults. / Tudor-Locke, Catrine; Craig, Cora L.; Brown, Wendy J.; Clemes, Stacy A.; De Cocker, Katrien; Giles-Corti, Billie; Hatano, Yoshiro; Inoue, Shigeru; Matsudo, Sandra M.; Mutrie, Nanette; Oppert, Jean-Michel; Rowe, David A.; Schmidt, Michael D.; Schofield, Grant M.; Spence, John C.; Teixeira, Pedro J.; Tully, Mark A.; Blair, Steven N.

In: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 8, No. 79, 79, 28.07.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How many steps/day are enough? for adults

AU - Tudor-Locke, Catrine

AU - Craig, Cora L.

AU - Brown, Wendy J.

AU - Clemes, Stacy A.

AU - De Cocker, Katrien

AU - Giles-Corti, Billie

AU - Hatano, Yoshiro

AU - Inoue, Shigeru

AU - Matsudo, Sandra M.

AU - Mutrie, Nanette

AU - Oppert, Jean-Michel

AU - Rowe, David A.

AU - Schmidt, Michael D.

AU - Schofield, Grant M.

AU - Spence, John C.

AU - Teixeira, Pedro J.

AU - Tully, Mark A.

AU - Blair, Steven N.

PY - 2011/7/28

Y1 - 2011/7/28

N2 - Physical activity guidelines from around the world are typically expressed in terms of frequency, duration, and intensity parameters. Objective monitoring using pedometers and accelerometers offers a new opportunity to measure and communicate physical activity in terms of steps/day. Various step-based versions or translations of physical activity guidelines are emerging, reflecting public interest in such guidance. However, there appears to be a wide discrepancy in the exact values that are being communicated. It makes sense that step-based recommendations should be harmonious with existing evidence-based public health guidelines that recognize that "some physical activity is better than none" while maintaining a focus on time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Thus, the purpose of this review was to update our existing knowledge of "How many steps/day are enough?", and to inform step-based recommendations consistent with current physical activity guidelines. Normative data indicate that healthy adults typically take between 4,000 and 18,000 steps/day, and that 10,000 steps/day is reasonable for this population, although there are notable "low active populations." Interventions demonstrate incremental increases on the order of 2,000-2,500 steps/day. The results of seven different controlled studies demonstrate that there is a strong relationship between cadence and intensity. Further, despite some inter-individual variation, 100 steps/minute represents a reasonable floor value indicative of moderate intensity walking. Multiplying this cadence by 30 minutes (i.e., typical of a daily recommendation) produces a minimum of 3,000 steps that is best used as a heuristic (i.e., guiding) value, but these steps must be taken over and above habitual activity levels to be a true expression of free-living steps/day that also includes recommendations for minimal amounts of time in MVPA. Computed steps/day translations of time in MVPA that also include estimates of habitual activity levels equate to 7,100 to 11,000 steps/day. A direct estimate of minimal amounts of MVPA accumulated in the course of objectively monitored free-living behaviour is 7,000-8,000 steps/day. A scale that spans a wide range of incremental increases in steps/day and is congruent with public health recognition that "some physical activity is better than none," yet still incorporates step-based translations of recommended amounts of time in MVPA may be useful in research and practice. The full range of users (researchers to practitioners to the general public) of objective monitoring instruments that provide step-based outputs require good reference data and evidence-based recommendations to be able to design effective health messages congruent with public health physical activity guidelines, guide behaviour change, and ultimately measure, track, and interpret steps/day.

AB - Physical activity guidelines from around the world are typically expressed in terms of frequency, duration, and intensity parameters. Objective monitoring using pedometers and accelerometers offers a new opportunity to measure and communicate physical activity in terms of steps/day. Various step-based versions or translations of physical activity guidelines are emerging, reflecting public interest in such guidance. However, there appears to be a wide discrepancy in the exact values that are being communicated. It makes sense that step-based recommendations should be harmonious with existing evidence-based public health guidelines that recognize that "some physical activity is better than none" while maintaining a focus on time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Thus, the purpose of this review was to update our existing knowledge of "How many steps/day are enough?", and to inform step-based recommendations consistent with current physical activity guidelines. Normative data indicate that healthy adults typically take between 4,000 and 18,000 steps/day, and that 10,000 steps/day is reasonable for this population, although there are notable "low active populations." Interventions demonstrate incremental increases on the order of 2,000-2,500 steps/day. The results of seven different controlled studies demonstrate that there is a strong relationship between cadence and intensity. Further, despite some inter-individual variation, 100 steps/minute represents a reasonable floor value indicative of moderate intensity walking. Multiplying this cadence by 30 minutes (i.e., typical of a daily recommendation) produces a minimum of 3,000 steps that is best used as a heuristic (i.e., guiding) value, but these steps must be taken over and above habitual activity levels to be a true expression of free-living steps/day that also includes recommendations for minimal amounts of time in MVPA. Computed steps/day translations of time in MVPA that also include estimates of habitual activity levels equate to 7,100 to 11,000 steps/day. A direct estimate of minimal amounts of MVPA accumulated in the course of objectively monitored free-living behaviour is 7,000-8,000 steps/day. A scale that spans a wide range of incremental increases in steps/day and is congruent with public health recognition that "some physical activity is better than none," yet still incorporates step-based translations of recommended amounts of time in MVPA may be useful in research and practice. The full range of users (researchers to practitioners to the general public) of objective monitoring instruments that provide step-based outputs require good reference data and evidence-based recommendations to be able to design effective health messages congruent with public health physical activity guidelines, guide behaviour change, and ultimately measure, track, and interpret steps/day.

KW - walking

KW - pedometer-based walking

KW - pedometers

KW - accelerometers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960655671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1479-5868-8-79

DO - 10.1186/1479-5868-8-79

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

T2 - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

JF - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

SN - 1479-5868

IS - 79

M1 - 79

ER -

Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Brown WJ, Clemes SA, De Cocker K, Giles-Corti B et al. How many steps/day are enough? for adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2011 Jul 28;8(79). 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-79