How important is flexion angle during collateral stress testing of the knee?

J.V. Clarke, S.J. Spencer, A.H. Deakin, F. Picard, P.E. Riches

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Assessment of coronal knee laxity via manual stress testing is commonly performed during joint examination. While it is generally accepted that the knee should be flexed slightly to assess its collateral restraints, the importance of the exact degree of flexion at time of testing has not been documented. The aim of this study therefore was to assess the effect of differing degrees of knee flexion on the magnitude of coronal deflection observed during collateral stress testing.Using non-invasive infrared technology, the real-time coronal and sagittal mechanical femorotibial (MFT) angles of three asymptomatic volunteers were measured. A single examiner, blinded to the real-time display of coronal but not sagittal alignment, held the knee in maximum extension and performed manual varus and valgus stress manoeuvres to a perceived end-point. This sequence was repeated at 5° increments up to 30° of flexion. This provided unstressed, varus and valgus coronal alignment measurements as well as overall envelope of laxity (valgus angle – varus angle) which were subsequently regressed against knee flexion.Regression analysis indicated that all regression coefficients were significantly different to zero (p <0.001). With increasing knee flexion, valgus MFT angles became more valgus and varus MFT angles became more. The overall laxity of the knee in the coronal plane increased approximately fourfold with 30° of knee flexion.The results demonstrated that small changes in knee flexion could result in significant changes in coronal knee laxity, an observation which has important clinical relevance and applications. For example the assessment of medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries can be based on the perceived amount of joint opening with no reference made to knee flexion at time of assessment. Therefore, close attention should be paid to the flexion angle of the knee during stress testing in order to achieve a reliable and reproducible assessment.
LanguageEnglish
Pages40
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume
Volume94-B
Issue numberSupp XXVIII
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Knee
Joints
Collateral Ligaments
Volunteers
Regression Analysis
Observation
Technology
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • flexion angle
  • collateral stress
  • stress testing

Cite this

Clarke, J.V. ; Spencer, S.J. ; Deakin, A.H. ; Picard, F. ; Riches, P.E. / How important is flexion angle during collateral stress testing of the knee?. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume . 2012 ; Vol. 94-B, No. Supp XXVIII. pp. 40.
@article{4d81f8a7b71d42fe859ffa67ff447ac8,
title = "How important is flexion angle during collateral stress testing of the knee?",
abstract = "Assessment of coronal knee laxity via manual stress testing is commonly performed during joint examination. While it is generally accepted that the knee should be flexed slightly to assess its collateral restraints, the importance of the exact degree of flexion at time of testing has not been documented. The aim of this study therefore was to assess the effect of differing degrees of knee flexion on the magnitude of coronal deflection observed during collateral stress testing.Using non-invasive infrared technology, the real-time coronal and sagittal mechanical femorotibial (MFT) angles of three asymptomatic volunteers were measured. A single examiner, blinded to the real-time display of coronal but not sagittal alignment, held the knee in maximum extension and performed manual varus and valgus stress manoeuvres to a perceived end-point. This sequence was repeated at 5° increments up to 30° of flexion. This provided unstressed, varus and valgus coronal alignment measurements as well as overall envelope of laxity (valgus angle – varus angle) which were subsequently regressed against knee flexion.Regression analysis indicated that all regression coefficients were significantly different to zero (p <0.001). With increasing knee flexion, valgus MFT angles became more valgus and varus MFT angles became more. The overall laxity of the knee in the coronal plane increased approximately fourfold with 30° of knee flexion.The results demonstrated that small changes in knee flexion could result in significant changes in coronal knee laxity, an observation which has important clinical relevance and applications. For example the assessment of medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries can be based on the perceived amount of joint opening with no reference made to knee flexion at time of assessment. Therefore, close attention should be paid to the flexion angle of the knee during stress testing in order to achieve a reliable and reproducible assessment.",
keywords = "flexion angle, collateral stress, stress testing",
author = "J.V. Clarke and S.J. Spencer and A.H. Deakin and F. Picard and P.E. Riches",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "94-B",
pages = "40",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume",
issn = "0301-620X",
number = "Supp XXVIII",

}

Clarke, JV, Spencer, SJ, Deakin, AH, Picard, F & Riches, PE 2012, 'How important is flexion angle during collateral stress testing of the knee?' Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume , vol. 94-B, no. Supp XXVIII, pp. 40.

How important is flexion angle during collateral stress testing of the knee? / Clarke, J.V.; Spencer, S.J.; Deakin, A.H.; Picard, F.; Riches, P.E.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume , Vol. 94-B, No. Supp XXVIII, 01.06.2012, p. 40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How important is flexion angle during collateral stress testing of the knee?

AU - Clarke, J.V.

AU - Spencer, S.J.

AU - Deakin, A.H.

AU - Picard, F.

AU - Riches, P.E.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Assessment of coronal knee laxity via manual stress testing is commonly performed during joint examination. While it is generally accepted that the knee should be flexed slightly to assess its collateral restraints, the importance of the exact degree of flexion at time of testing has not been documented. The aim of this study therefore was to assess the effect of differing degrees of knee flexion on the magnitude of coronal deflection observed during collateral stress testing.Using non-invasive infrared technology, the real-time coronal and sagittal mechanical femorotibial (MFT) angles of three asymptomatic volunteers were measured. A single examiner, blinded to the real-time display of coronal but not sagittal alignment, held the knee in maximum extension and performed manual varus and valgus stress manoeuvres to a perceived end-point. This sequence was repeated at 5° increments up to 30° of flexion. This provided unstressed, varus and valgus coronal alignment measurements as well as overall envelope of laxity (valgus angle – varus angle) which were subsequently regressed against knee flexion.Regression analysis indicated that all regression coefficients were significantly different to zero (p <0.001). With increasing knee flexion, valgus MFT angles became more valgus and varus MFT angles became more. The overall laxity of the knee in the coronal plane increased approximately fourfold with 30° of knee flexion.The results demonstrated that small changes in knee flexion could result in significant changes in coronal knee laxity, an observation which has important clinical relevance and applications. For example the assessment of medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries can be based on the perceived amount of joint opening with no reference made to knee flexion at time of assessment. Therefore, close attention should be paid to the flexion angle of the knee during stress testing in order to achieve a reliable and reproducible assessment.

AB - Assessment of coronal knee laxity via manual stress testing is commonly performed during joint examination. While it is generally accepted that the knee should be flexed slightly to assess its collateral restraints, the importance of the exact degree of flexion at time of testing has not been documented. The aim of this study therefore was to assess the effect of differing degrees of knee flexion on the magnitude of coronal deflection observed during collateral stress testing.Using non-invasive infrared technology, the real-time coronal and sagittal mechanical femorotibial (MFT) angles of three asymptomatic volunteers were measured. A single examiner, blinded to the real-time display of coronal but not sagittal alignment, held the knee in maximum extension and performed manual varus and valgus stress manoeuvres to a perceived end-point. This sequence was repeated at 5° increments up to 30° of flexion. This provided unstressed, varus and valgus coronal alignment measurements as well as overall envelope of laxity (valgus angle – varus angle) which were subsequently regressed against knee flexion.Regression analysis indicated that all regression coefficients were significantly different to zero (p <0.001). With increasing knee flexion, valgus MFT angles became more valgus and varus MFT angles became more. The overall laxity of the knee in the coronal plane increased approximately fourfold with 30° of knee flexion.The results demonstrated that small changes in knee flexion could result in significant changes in coronal knee laxity, an observation which has important clinical relevance and applications. For example the assessment of medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries can be based on the perceived amount of joint opening with no reference made to knee flexion at time of assessment. Therefore, close attention should be paid to the flexion angle of the knee during stress testing in order to achieve a reliable and reproducible assessment.

KW - flexion angle

KW - collateral stress

KW - stress testing

UR - http://www.bjjprocs.boneandjoint.org.uk/content/94-B/SUPP_XXVIII/40.abstract

M3 - Article

VL - 94-B

SP - 40

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume

T2 - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume

SN - 0301-620X

IS - Supp XXVIII

ER -