How convincing is alternative assessment for use in higher education?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    51 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The current preference for alternative assessment has been partly stimulated by recent evidence on learning which points to the importance of students' active engagement in the learning process. While alternative assessment may well fulfil the aims of formative assessment, its value in the summative assessment required in higher education is more problematic. If alternative assessment devices are to be used for summative purposes, the validity of alternative assessment has to be considered. The paper argues that task specification and marking consistency in alternative assessment can make comparability of performance difficult to effect, thereby leaving alternative assessment a less than convincing form for use in higher education
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages311-321
    Number of pages10
    JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
    Volume29
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2004

    Fingerprint

    education
    learning process
    learning
    performance
    evidence
    Values
    student

    Cite this

    @article{92d5e720d58d4c54ad728a7ddeb405b4,
    title = "How convincing is alternative assessment for use in higher education?",
    abstract = "The current preference for alternative assessment has been partly stimulated by recent evidence on learning which points to the importance of students' active engagement in the learning process. While alternative assessment may well fulfil the aims of formative assessment, its value in the summative assessment required in higher education is more problematic. If alternative assessment devices are to be used for summative purposes, the validity of alternative assessment has to be considered. The paper argues that task specification and marking consistency in alternative assessment can make comparability of performance difficult to effect, thereby leaving alternative assessment a less than convincing form for use in higher education",
    author = "Effie Maclellan",
    year = "2004",
    month = "6",
    day = "1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "29",
    pages = "311--321",
    journal = "Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education",
    issn = "0260-2938",
    number = "3",

    }

    How convincing is alternative assessment for use in higher education? / Maclellan, Effie.

    In: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 29, No. 3, 01.06.2004, p. 311-321.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How convincing is alternative assessment for use in higher education?

    AU - Maclellan, Effie

    PY - 2004/6/1

    Y1 - 2004/6/1

    N2 - The current preference for alternative assessment has been partly stimulated by recent evidence on learning which points to the importance of students' active engagement in the learning process. While alternative assessment may well fulfil the aims of formative assessment, its value in the summative assessment required in higher education is more problematic. If alternative assessment devices are to be used for summative purposes, the validity of alternative assessment has to be considered. The paper argues that task specification and marking consistency in alternative assessment can make comparability of performance difficult to effect, thereby leaving alternative assessment a less than convincing form for use in higher education

    AB - The current preference for alternative assessment has been partly stimulated by recent evidence on learning which points to the importance of students' active engagement in the learning process. While alternative assessment may well fulfil the aims of formative assessment, its value in the summative assessment required in higher education is more problematic. If alternative assessment devices are to be used for summative purposes, the validity of alternative assessment has to be considered. The paper argues that task specification and marking consistency in alternative assessment can make comparability of performance difficult to effect, thereby leaving alternative assessment a less than convincing form for use in higher education

    UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000188267

    M3 - Article

    VL - 29

    SP - 311

    EP - 321

    JO - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

    T2 - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

    JF - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

    SN - 0260-2938

    IS - 3

    ER -