TY - CHAP
T1 - How algorithmic policing challenges fundamental rights protection in the EU
T2 - lessons from the United Kingdom
AU - Harkens, Adam
PY - 2024/3/15
Y1 - 2024/3/15
N2 - Police forces in the United Kingdom are quickly emerging as global pioneers in the design, deployment, and use of algorithmic tools for pre-trial decision-making purposes: i.e., the prevention, detection, and investigation of criminal offending. Technologies enabling live facial recognition, geographic 'hotspot' mapping – and the predictive risk assessment of an individual's likelihood of future offending – can, and are, being used to make police decisions about whether to initiate surveillance and intelligence-gathering activities, whether to stop, question and/or search specific persons or their property, and/or whether to arrest and detain individuals suspected of criminal offending or of having significant risk of future offending.
AB - Police forces in the United Kingdom are quickly emerging as global pioneers in the design, deployment, and use of algorithmic tools for pre-trial decision-making purposes: i.e., the prevention, detection, and investigation of criminal offending. Technologies enabling live facial recognition, geographic 'hotspot' mapping – and the predictive risk assessment of an individual's likelihood of future offending – can, and are, being used to make police decisions about whether to initiate surveillance and intelligence-gathering activities, whether to stop, question and/or search specific persons or their property, and/or whether to arrest and detain individuals suspected of criminal offending or of having significant risk of future offending.
KW - algorithmic policing
KW - administrative law
KW - EU Law
KW - AI regulation
KW - human rights
KW - fundamental rights
KW - predictive policing
KW - AI Act
UR - https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4760862
M3 - Chapter
T3 - Data Science, Machine Intelligence, and Law
BT - The Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Law in Europe
PB - Springer
ER -