Higher education and non-pecuniary returns in Germany: tracing the mechanisms behind field of study effects at the start of the career

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article addresses the question of why fields of study differ in early labour market returns. It is argued that the higher the potential training costs of a field of study the more problematic the labour market integration of graduates. This is due to the fact that employers use the occupational specificity and selectivity of a study programme as a signal for the expected training costs. In addition, the article suggests that structural relations between fields and occupations act as mediators for the effect of field of study on non-pecuniary returns. Using the German HIS Graduate Panel 1997, the results indicate that a lack of occupational specificity is partly responsible for differences between fields of study. Selectivity measures do not contribute to an explanation. As expected, working in the public sector and the required expertise for a job strongly mediate field of study differences.
LanguageEnglish
Pages253-270
Number of pages18
JournalIrish Educational Studies
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jun 2011

Fingerprint

field of study
career
education
labor market integration
graduate
study program
costs
public sector
employer
occupation
expertise
labor market
lack

Keywords

  • field of study
  • labour market outcomes
  • occupations
  • mechanisms
  • Germany

Cite this

@article{68e4fd46873146bfa811dd8261e25fbd,
title = "Higher education and non-pecuniary returns in Germany: tracing the mechanisms behind field of study effects at the start of the career",
abstract = "This article addresses the question of why fields of study differ in early labour market returns. It is argued that the higher the potential training costs of a field of study the more problematic the labour market integration of graduates. This is due to the fact that employers use the occupational specificity and selectivity of a study programme as a signal for the expected training costs. In addition, the article suggests that structural relations between fields and occupations act as mediators for the effect of field of study on non-pecuniary returns. Using the German HIS Graduate Panel 1997, the results indicate that a lack of occupational specificity is partly responsible for differences between fields of study. Selectivity measures do not contribute to an explanation. As expected, working in the public sector and the required expertise for a job strongly mediate field of study differences.",
keywords = "field of study, labour market outcomes, occupations, mechanisms, Germany",
author = "Markus Klein",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Irish Educational Studies on 24 June 2011, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03323315.2011.569144. {\circledC} Educational Studies Association of Ireland, 2011.",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1080/03323315.2011.569144",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "253--270",
journal = "Irish Educational Studies",
issn = "0332-3315",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Higher education and non-pecuniary returns in Germany

T2 - Irish Educational Studies

AU - Klein, Markus

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Irish Educational Studies on 24 June 2011, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03323315.2011.569144. © Educational Studies Association of Ireland, 2011.

PY - 2011/6/24

Y1 - 2011/6/24

N2 - This article addresses the question of why fields of study differ in early labour market returns. It is argued that the higher the potential training costs of a field of study the more problematic the labour market integration of graduates. This is due to the fact that employers use the occupational specificity and selectivity of a study programme as a signal for the expected training costs. In addition, the article suggests that structural relations between fields and occupations act as mediators for the effect of field of study on non-pecuniary returns. Using the German HIS Graduate Panel 1997, the results indicate that a lack of occupational specificity is partly responsible for differences between fields of study. Selectivity measures do not contribute to an explanation. As expected, working in the public sector and the required expertise for a job strongly mediate field of study differences.

AB - This article addresses the question of why fields of study differ in early labour market returns. It is argued that the higher the potential training costs of a field of study the more problematic the labour market integration of graduates. This is due to the fact that employers use the occupational specificity and selectivity of a study programme as a signal for the expected training costs. In addition, the article suggests that structural relations between fields and occupations act as mediators for the effect of field of study on non-pecuniary returns. Using the German HIS Graduate Panel 1997, the results indicate that a lack of occupational specificity is partly responsible for differences between fields of study. Selectivity measures do not contribute to an explanation. As expected, working in the public sector and the required expertise for a job strongly mediate field of study differences.

KW - field of study

KW - labour market outcomes

KW - occupations

KW - mechanisms

KW - Germany

U2 - 10.1080/03323315.2011.569144

DO - 10.1080/03323315.2011.569144

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 253

EP - 270

JO - Irish Educational Studies

JF - Irish Educational Studies

SN - 0332-3315

IS - 2

ER -