Healthcare funding and its relationship to equity and outcomes

a qualitative comparative analysis of commonwealth fund and OECD data

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper examines OECD data to explore the relationship between the level and means of funding of 11 different healthcare systems on the one hand, and Commonwealth Fund data which assess overall system performance, equity and health outcome measures on the other. It utilises Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), and the idea of ‘fitness landscapes’ to analyse combinations of funding combinations and outcomes. It finds that health systems with relatively high levels of voluntary health insurance tend to be in sets of countries with low outcome measures, but that high outcome achievement is often part of fitness landscapes that are dependent upon specific combinations of funding patterns that make generalisations more difficult. The paper finds that medium levels of out-of-pocket expenditures, in combinations with other specific funding factors, and in opposition to existing work, are not incompatible with both high equity and high health outcomes scores. Finally, it explores how ‘contradictory cases’ can be used to explore how systems falling short of the outcomes of others with the same funding patterns might find improvements.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages33
    JournalJournal of European Social Policy
    Publication statusAccepted/In press - 17 Nov 2019

    Fingerprint

    OECD
    equity
    funding
    fitness
    health
    health insurance
    expenditures
    opposition
    performance

    Keywords

    • OECD data
    • healthcare systems
    • qualitative comparative analysis

    Cite this

    @article{92116ba148f7421ea7030d5971c01730,
    title = "Healthcare funding and its relationship to equity and outcomes: a qualitative comparative analysis of commonwealth fund and OECD data",
    abstract = "This paper examines OECD data to explore the relationship between the level and means of funding of 11 different healthcare systems on the one hand, and Commonwealth Fund data which assess overall system performance, equity and health outcome measures on the other. It utilises Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), and the idea of ‘fitness landscapes’ to analyse combinations of funding combinations and outcomes. It finds that health systems with relatively high levels of voluntary health insurance tend to be in sets of countries with low outcome measures, but that high outcome achievement is often part of fitness landscapes that are dependent upon specific combinations of funding patterns that make generalisations more difficult. The paper finds that medium levels of out-of-pocket expenditures, in combinations with other specific funding factors, and in opposition to existing work, are not incompatible with both high equity and high health outcomes scores. Finally, it explores how ‘contradictory cases’ can be used to explore how systems falling short of the outcomes of others with the same funding patterns might find improvements.",
    keywords = "OECD data, healthcare systems, qualitative comparative analysis",
    author = "Ian Greener",
    year = "2019",
    month = "11",
    day = "17",
    language = "English",

    }

    Healthcare funding and its relationship to equity and outcomes : a qualitative comparative analysis of commonwealth fund and OECD data . / Greener, Ian.

    In: Journal of European Social Policy, 17.11.2019.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Healthcare funding and its relationship to equity and outcomes

    T2 - a qualitative comparative analysis of commonwealth fund and OECD data

    AU - Greener, Ian

    PY - 2019/11/17

    Y1 - 2019/11/17

    N2 - This paper examines OECD data to explore the relationship between the level and means of funding of 11 different healthcare systems on the one hand, and Commonwealth Fund data which assess overall system performance, equity and health outcome measures on the other. It utilises Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), and the idea of ‘fitness landscapes’ to analyse combinations of funding combinations and outcomes. It finds that health systems with relatively high levels of voluntary health insurance tend to be in sets of countries with low outcome measures, but that high outcome achievement is often part of fitness landscapes that are dependent upon specific combinations of funding patterns that make generalisations more difficult. The paper finds that medium levels of out-of-pocket expenditures, in combinations with other specific funding factors, and in opposition to existing work, are not incompatible with both high equity and high health outcomes scores. Finally, it explores how ‘contradictory cases’ can be used to explore how systems falling short of the outcomes of others with the same funding patterns might find improvements.

    AB - This paper examines OECD data to explore the relationship between the level and means of funding of 11 different healthcare systems on the one hand, and Commonwealth Fund data which assess overall system performance, equity and health outcome measures on the other. It utilises Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), and the idea of ‘fitness landscapes’ to analyse combinations of funding combinations and outcomes. It finds that health systems with relatively high levels of voluntary health insurance tend to be in sets of countries with low outcome measures, but that high outcome achievement is often part of fitness landscapes that are dependent upon specific combinations of funding patterns that make generalisations more difficult. The paper finds that medium levels of out-of-pocket expenditures, in combinations with other specific funding factors, and in opposition to existing work, are not incompatible with both high equity and high health outcomes scores. Finally, it explores how ‘contradictory cases’ can be used to explore how systems falling short of the outcomes of others with the same funding patterns might find improvements.

    KW - OECD data

    KW - healthcare systems

    KW - qualitative comparative analysis

    UR - https://journals.sagepub.com/home/esp

    M3 - Article

    ER -