Abstract
This paper outlines the ideas of Ralph Hawtrey and Lauchlin Currie on the need for monetised fiscal deficit spending in 1930s USA to combat the deep depression into which the economy had been allowed to sink. In such exceptional circumstances of "credit deadlock" in which banks were afraid to lend and households and business afraid to borrow, the deadlock could best be broken through the spending of new money into circulation via large fiscal deficits. This complementarity of fiscal and monetary policy was shown to be essential, and as such indicates the potential power of monetary policy – in contrast to the Keynesian "liquidity trap" view that it is powerless This lesson was not learned by the Japanese authorities in their response to the asset price collapse of 1991-92, resulting in a lost decade as ballooning fiscal deficits were neutralised throughout the 1990s by unhelpfully tight monetary policy with the Bank of Japan refusing to monetise the deficits.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | David Laidler's Contributions to Economics |
| Editors | Robert Leeson |
| Place of Publication | Houndmills |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. |
| Pages | 329-365 |
| Number of pages | 37 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780230018983 |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Feb 2010 |
Keywords
- credit deadlock
- great depression
- 1930s
- economics
- Japan
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Hawtreyan 'credit deadlock' or Keynesian 'liquidity trap'? Lessons for Japan from the Great Depression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 15 Citations
- 1 Working paper
-
Hawtreyan 'credit deadlock' or Keynesian 'liquidity trap'? Lessons for Japan from the great depression
Sandilands, R., 23 Jan 2009, Glasgow.: University of Strathclyde, 48 p. (Strathclyde Discussion Papers in Economics; vol. 09-04).Research output: Working paper/Preprint/Pre-registration › Working paper
Open AccessFile
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver